Economic Sciences/5.
Human Resource Management
Ì.N. Dyussekeshev, G.A. Saymagambetova
Caspian State University of Technologies and Engineering named after
Sh.Yessenov, the Republic of Kazakhstan
Factors that characterize the labor
potential
Working potential
of employee (WPE) is the total capacity of the physical and spiritual qualities
of the individual worker to achieve the specified conditions of certain results
of its production activities on the one hand, and the ability to improve in the
labor process, to solve new problems arising from changes in production - with
other.
Working potential
of employee includes:
• psychological
and physiological potential - the ability and inclination of man, his health,
performance, endurance, type of nervous system, etc.;
• qualifying
potential - volume, depth and diversity of knowledge and expertise, skills and
abilities, resulting in the ability of the worker to work a certain content and
complexity;
• personal
potential - the level of civic awareness and social maturity, degree of
assimilation of employee attitudes toward work norms, values, interests, needs and demands at work, based on the hierarchy of human
needs.
Consider
psychological and physiological potential. According to the World Health
Organization (WHO), "health - a state of complete physical and social well
being. Well-being - this is a dynamic state of mind characterized by a harmony
between the mental abilities, needs and expectations of the employee and the
demands and opportunities that presents and provides the environment ".
[1]
Qualification
component of labor potential, on the one hand, characterizes the trained
workers to perform increasingly complex job functions, change of work, and on
the other - is a factor in shaping the attitude toward labor, labor discipline,
labor intensity. It can be classified according to the following attribute,
reflecting the individual characteristics of each employee.
Qualification component of the labor potential:
1.
The level of training
1.1.
Stage of basic education
1.2.
Wide profile
1.3.
Monotechnics
2.
Creativity
2.1.
Initiator
2.2.
Experimentalist
2.3.
Theorist
2.4.
Mixed type
3.
Ambition for increase personal
potential
3.1.
Knowledge
3.2.
Skills
3.3.
Proficiency
3.4.
Age
3.5.
Type of nervous system
3.6.
Gender
3.7.
Work experience (general and
specialty)
4.
Labor activity
4.1.
Creative worker
4.2.
Performer
5.
Labor mobility
5.1.
Macro mobility
5.2.
Micro mobility
6.
Productivity of work
6.1.
The quality of work
6.2.
The amount of work
6.3.
The efficiency of labor
6.4.
Rational use of the work time
Allocation of
social and personal part in the labor potential should accept the attention of
potential or future, or simply as "unused", social opportunities of
the employee. This component describes the ability of a person to
self-education and self-development [2].
The structure of
personal potential includes the following main elements:
• ability to
cooperate, collective organization and interaction (communicative potential);
• creativity;
•
value-motivational properties (ideological, philosophical and moral
potential.);
• assessment of
the labor potential employee should establish the quantity, quality,
consistency and measures of this potential for the organization.
In general terms
the nature of human resource management through assessment of its capacity is
reduced to the solution of three interrelated tasks. Firstly, the formation of
productive abilities that best correspond to the requirements of the quality of
labor which head. Second, the creation of socio-economic and industrial and
technical conditions for the production, in which there is a maximum use of the
ability of workers to this work. Third, these processes must not cause damage
to the body and the interests of the individual worker.
Due to the
diversity of natural, environmental, and social characteristics of the
individual territories formed various conditions affecting the size and
structure of the population's material goods and services. This predetermined
significant differentiation cost of living, inequality of consumption of
various parts of certain goods and services. Therefore, according to S.M.
Buhanovoy and A. Doroshenko, when assessing the value of the labor potential is
also required consideration of the following groups of factors:
· natural-climatic;
· demographic;
· features of life in urban and rural areas;
· features of settlement;
· level of economic development;
· in overall culture of the population.
Assessment of the
labor potential employees - rather complicated in terms of methodological and
organizational challenge. It should be noted that a single universal method
suitable for solving complex problems is currently lacking in statistical
practice. Development of a method will depend on the purpose of research,
evaluation, characterized category of employees, organizational culture and
philosophy of the company and other factors.
The methods used
in the evaluation of total employment potential of the company, include a
number of indicators to characterize the potential of workers from the
qualitative and quantitative aspects.
To characterize
the total labor potential quantitatively using indicators such as: number of
industrial personnel and not industrial units, the number of working hours,
potential for working with a normal level of labor intensity (envelope worker
participation in labor). Number of industrial personnel is one of the most
important indicators of the production capacity of the enterprise. The higher
the number, the other conditions being equal, the more the volume of output.
Such a way of increasing the volume of production is classified as extensive.
As a complex and
multi-structured socio-economic formation, the working potential of the
organization includes the following components: personnel, professional
qualification and organizational. This release is conditional, not absolute,
and is designed to better define the extent of targeting a particular group of
factors shape each of the components of the working potential of the
organization. It is more than necessary in the present conditions, when the
structure of the labor potential of the organization is not determined by the
rigidity and stability and mobility and flexibility, the ability to rapid
restructuring.
In contrast to
the labor force, uniting all workers with a "generic" ability to
work, to the staff is only the part which has the professional ability to
work, has special training. Thus, the value of the enterprise workforce
more "frame" on the part that are unskilled and low-skilled workers.
The
organizational component of the employment potential of the organization also
determines the intensity of individual employment potential for regulated
working hours.
Quality of
potential is relative term. It opens with a set of attributes:
demographic, biomedical, professional qualifications, social,
psycho-physiological, ideological, political and moral.
In practice, the
quantitative assessment of the labor potential is usually only part of the
components such as gender, age, health status, and level of education.
Proposed, in particular, to carry out an assessment of the labor potential
employee on a 10-point scale in the context of indicators of age, health,
training of employees, potential for professional growth of the profession,
etc. The system parameters can be easily calculated at each company, but
unlikely to be characterized by the utilization of labor potential.
Economists
believe that as the main indicator of the volume of labor potential of playing
man-hour. The value of the total potential working time fund the production
team to the volume value of the run-time manufacturing jobs to the group of
workers. This fund reflects the whole amount of potential employees for any
period of time.
Quality
characteristics of the labor potential aims to estimate the physical and
psychological potential of employees, the amount of general and specialized
knowledge, skills and abilities, resulting in the ability to work a certain
quality, the quality of team members, as economic agents.
There is also a
method of assessing the value of labor potential. For example, Avdeenko V.N.
and Kolosova R.P. offer in the price of labor potential, besides value terms of
labor costs, also include the costs associated with staff training, retraining
and skills [3].
Reduced
cost-based approach estimates the labor potential in line with international
standard classification of labor costs. However, for the practice of management
is more important metrics by which to quantify the side or the other potential
to find out where it is above or below, as changed thanks to the measures
taken, as far as actually used its value differs from the possible, etc.
Thus, in
assessing the needs of the labor potential characteristic of its quantitative
and qualitative aspects.
To characterize
the labor potential quantitatively using such indicators as:
·
number of industrial personnel and
non-industrial units;
·
the number of working hours,
potential for mining the normal level of labor intensity (envelope worker participation
in labor).
Quality characteristics of the labor potential designed to assess:
·
physical and psychological potential
employees (the employee's ability and inclination to work - health, physical
development, endurance, etc.);
·
of general and specialized
knowledge, skills and abilities, resulting in the ability to work a certain
quality (education and qualification levels, fundamental training, etc.);
·
as a member of the team as business
entities (responsibility, conscious maturity, interest, ownership to the
economic activity of the enterprise, etc.).
Characteristic
quality of the employment potential can also be done with the use of
quantitative indicators. For example, to assess the health status indicators
used frequency and severity of illness per 100 employees ( health is assessed
indirectly through morbidity), to assess the skill level - the average level of
the workers, the level of education - the average number of secondary schools,
for evaluation of training - the proportion of persons who have completed
vocational school, the number of months of training, etc.
Gathering this
type of information, particularly in obtaining qualitative characteristics, is
difficult and requires special study. Therefore, a simplified approach, where
the qualitative characteristics of the labor potential is limited to data that
reflect the educational and skill levels, special training and its duration,
the age and sex composition.
If would be a
single synthetic measure that would characterize the value of the entire set of
heterogeneous factors of labor potential, then we would have to compare the
value of labor potential at a given point in time for various teams, to
identify the effect of individual factors on its total value, which would
facilitate the selection of personnel policy and contribute to a more efficient
use of labor potential. However, the problem remains unsolved. Used in the
practice of general indicators reflect no more than two or three elements of
the labor potential, and even then mostly quantitatively. For example, the rate
of the total fund of working time, which is possible for mining, is calculated
as a weighted average, where the weights is the number of employees who have or
that the established norm of working time (weekly or annual, fixed or actual
duration of the working day, etc.). In particular, this figure is used to
characterize the potential amount of labor in relation to the population of the
territory (community) [4] or to assess the potential of the labor at the
enterprise level. [5]
Thus, the
employment potential should be studied not as frozen category, but as a process
with its inherent variability and change and, as a result, the working
potential to be developed and used consistently, which must be kept rigid logic
and sequence prerequisite for the use must always be its formation and
development, and not vice versa.
Literature
1. World Health
Organization. Basic documents (Psychological and social factors at work and
health) / by editorship P. Kalim, M.A. El- Batavia, K.L. Cooper. Geneva:
WHO, 1989. C.19.
2. O.V. Stakhanov
On the structure of the labor potential / / Sociological Research. 1981. Number
2. p.75-79, Ivan N., Odegov Y.G., Andreev K.L. Labor potential of the
industrial enterprise. Saratov: publishing house SSU in 1988. p.99-122.
3. Kolosov R.P. Analysis
of the costs of living labor / / Problems of Economics. - 2002. - ¹ 3.
4. The main
provisions of the construction methods and the calculation of aggregate balance
of time the population economic area (community) / IEiOPP of the USSR. -
Novosibirsk, 1971.
5. Details of the
method of calculation and analysis of the potential cumulative fund of working
time at the enterprise level can be found in the book.: Analysis of employment
indicators / by editorship P.F.Petrochenko. - Moscow: Economics, 1989.