A.Orazbaeva c.p.s

A.Baitursinov Kostanay state university

MAIN PROBLEMS OF JURIS LINGUISTIC

Social function of the language is very wide. Language is very important in cultural, religious, national, social self-knowledge and political system. It is generally known that language has close ties with psychology, history, sociology, logics, philosophy and etc. on the basis of connection of the language with different spheres following branches made: psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, ethno linguistics, cognitive linguistics etc. However, in the linguistic literature legitimate aspect of the language that is to say connection of language and jurisprudence is not considered as a form of research.

Legitimate aspect of the language – is the subject who connects linguistics and jurisprudence. Legitimate aspect of the language has three directions:

1.Country’s jurisprudents theory and practice questions turn into national scientific research process. In that case juris linguistics experiments of foreign countries and countries of independent states (Russia) should be taken into consideration. In the west European and Russian literature linguistic aspects of low and right was widely discussed. Especially germenevtica (the art of interpretation) and logic questions actively acknowledged for consideration (interpretation, argumentation, linguistic estimation and etc.). In that situation considering judicial aspect of the language in national language is significant: “Main point and objective of national language in Kazakhstan’s language policy – Kazakh language should take part in the society life, examined, connected to its bearing measures, publicity, create lows, according to the lows combine the language, stability, approve central regulations of language life and etc. That is why exact and genuine form of policy of national language gave opportunity completely outlining linguistic assessment” [1].

2. Social, political and language-communication to turn into theoretical and practical significant matters. Juris linguistics by getting in scientific stream causes political claim in the science of low, mass media and political domains. Should give emphasis to that along with global importance of judicial aspects of the language it has historical importance. Language requiring “jurisdiction” appeared to be one of the social interactive devices. It is planned to solve some matters of argument with “jurisdiction” which were upraised by social communication.

3. Jurisprudential aspects of the language. Juris linguistics that is to say it stresses the significance of consideration legitimate language aspects theoretic and practical matters.

Linguistic and jurisprudence bound up together in juris linguistics, now jurisprudence experts are working on juris linguistic matters. Of course being professionals of jurisprudence their research will be based on their knowledge in the low sphere, and linguistics principles will be left aside or will be limited by mentioning connection of jurisprudence to the linguistics. [2,348] this opinion is approved by our Russian colleagues: “enormous amount of works are dedicated to study of language and low texts where mentioned judicial speech, language rights and problems of its improvement and etc.”

Language matters in jurisprudence known as self-regulating research method in the division of linguistic science need including it into scientific research process. Bearing in mind “Juridical” part of language and juris linguistic questions, many works have a lot of divergence in giving devotion to the linguistic peculiarities. Specifics of language divisions can be definite and accomplished through linguistic methods. Only outcomes of linguistic researches take language as a foundation of low, juris linguistics is mutual division of linguistics and jurisprudence, the theory and practice requirement of its objectives can be method of research, it shows not only our article but many other works: “Analyze theoretical and practical questions on the edge of language and low, linguistics and jurisprudence brings to imitations of exceptional directions of scientific researches – of juris linguistics,- which occupies the problems of interaction of normal language and juridical one, essential low of language being and lows particularized by low for regulation social conflicts related with language practice in unlike ranges of social life”.

Mutual forms of juris linguistics and lingua juristic are connection of language and low. Language connection to the low well-thought-out by juris linguistics and low connected to the language considered by lingua juristic.

In legitimate features of the language primarily you can see juridical signs, normal language image assembled from jurisprudence elements. Definition of language image is a few words and language from rating. A few words form goes to elemental language form where policy of language grammar is kept. As for language rating form, it belongs to unique codified language form which responds to the requirements of grammatical language low.

To get closer to the normal language vision to the low divisions in the first place should be language and its user’s social situation: “Language is fundamental social treasure, which controls all methods of vital function of society, including human right methods. Human rights normatively represent that conditions and vital functions of the people which required for the normal functioning of individual, society, state. Provision and stability of human rights depend on order and stability of the right objectivities of which probable through language. In implementing the most important communicative function language helps low to realize its main regulative function. And this controlling preemptory function of positive low determinate not only human rights but language functions, as long as language “appeared to be the only material, origin from which created all the low categories”.

Second, in juris linguistic sphere composed on the basis of low documents and used in the practice of jurisprudence normal language regulation questions belong.

List of literature

1.“Future and problems of national language in legislation of Republic of Kazakhstan” materials of Republic scientific-research. Astana, 2010.

2.N.N.Ivakina. Professional speech of lower: study material.1997.348p.