Ëîìîâà Åëåíà Àëåêñàíäðîâíà
Ó÷åíàÿ ñòåïåíü,
çâàíèå: Êàíäèäàò ôèëîëîãè÷åñêèõ íàóê
Ìåñòî ðàáîòû,
äîëæíîñòü: Äîöåíò êàôåäðû ðóññêîé è ìèðîâîé ëèòåðàòóðû
Êàçàõñêîãî
ãîñóäàðñòâåííîãî íàöèîíàëüíîãî ïåäàãîãè÷åñêîãî óíèâåðñèòåòà èìåíè Àáàÿ (ÊàçÍÏÓ
èì.Àáàÿ), Êàçàõñòàí, ã.Àëìàòû
ARTISTIC ECCENTRICITY IN ENGLISH LITERATURE FAIRY TALE.
Àííîòàöèÿ
 äàííîé ñòàòüå ðàññìàòðèâàåòñÿ ñâîåîáðàçèå
êîìïîçèöèè, àâòîðñêîé èäåè, ñþæåòà è ñòèëèñòè÷åñêèõ îñîáåííîñòåé â
ïðîèçâåäåíèÿõ Êèïëèíãà.
Êëþ÷åâûå
ñëîâà: ñêàçêà,
êîëîíèàëüíûå èäåè, îñíîâíàÿ ïîëèòè÷åñêàÿ ëèíèÿ, ÷åëîâå÷åñêàÿ ýíåðãèÿ è âîëÿ,
àíãëèéñêèé ôîëüêëîð.
Annotation
This
article observes the problem of a composition, a plot, author’s adea and
slylish features in English fairy tale, basically in the works of P.Kipling.
Keywords: fairy tale, colonial
ideas, basic political line, human energy and will, English folklore.
Discrete (discontinuous consisting of separate
parts) chronology of events is characteristic for of Kipling’s fairy
tales that is a
component of their ideological - art structure. So, for example, in R.
Kipling’s fairy tales the beginnings of life on Earth. In that, probably the
author saw cognitive and entertaining means of fairy tales. Kipling was born
and workied in the English colony (India) he well knew local and English
folklore.
But nevertheless his fairy tales are individual
and original would-be for conclusive true. So, for example, in a fairy tale
“Whence at the Whale such throat” here, as well as in other fairy tales of
Kipling used embodiment being endow characters with human speech and thinking.
All researchers of Kipling's creativity unanimously think that his best fairy
tales deficient his favorite imperialistic, colonial ideas: “exactly such
Kipling’s stories which is taking place as a matter of fact away from the basic
political line his creativity are representing the most indisputable art value”
[1].
The fairy tales of Kipling have called as
“animalism” because of there is images of animals - ancestor of: “present
‘‘animalism” stories including collection of “Simply fairy tales for children
(1902) - the best of all” [2].
But G.V. Anikin has not been liable to idealize
a fairy tale of Kipling and has rather resolutely expressed an opinion further:
these books have feel a reactionary' ideas of Kipling being insist on absolute
character of “Jungle rule” where strongest is alive. However these ideas step
back on the second plan before elements of cheerfulness and poeticize of human
energy and will” [3].
In a fair tale of “Whence at the Whale a throat’ the meeting of Whale which has eaten all in sea, with the person was fatal: the clever and brave seaman not only has to override the Whale, but also has put into his throat a lattice that
Whales did not swallow people. The person here is originator along with God, so have been
creating a new anatomy of the Whale such way as one needs to do that for, to
the person.
That to be identical of the person above the
nature – one of the basic ideas of Kipling’s fairy tale, as well as in a fairy
tale of “Why at the Camel a hump”. The camel because of insubordination to the
person and refusal to do one's duty along with the Horse, Dog and Bull has been
punished by Genie and action of this story have started on beginnings of life
on Earth: “In the earliest, long time ago – all ground were like a brand - new”
[4].
The
camel could not make for these missed three days and has as a punishment a hump and cannot learn to
behave that was happened because of person – a crown of the nature, the author
represented a person above all alive and also through of refusal to serve him
faithfully should be punished by the most severe way.
Kipling in these fairly tales had to take upon
oneself a role of the most ancient chronicler – the witness of Universe
evolution in harmony along their orders. At that the writer was not worried so mach about
scientific authenticity as about an idea of domination of the person above
animals. Fantastic versions of Kipling are popular among children in view of
interest and entertaining.
There is also for children have edification as
to fulfill the requirements of genre demanded. Moreover these fairy tales of
Kipling come to final with poem being logic continuation of the prosaic text.
In a fairy tale of “Whence at the Rhinoceros a skin” for bad behavior was
punished the Rhinoceros by Pars through that was eaten a pie without asking
leave. In revenge the Pars pour in skin of the Rhinoceros grog while the
Rhinoceros has gone to bathe.
The humanize of Rhinoceros it was showed first
of all in outward appearance: “Then, skin of Rhinoceros still was button up on
a stomach and was look like rubber raincoat” [5]. Since at Rhinoceroses nasty
character and folds on a skin which heretofore is off. The Kipling have to
ignore by evolution and have been misses events chronology in the fairy tales:
having shown the reason of mould the character and faces personages, he being
jumps through centuries, expressly have missed the period between beginnings of
animals and present such as kind and characters but for all that have not allow
any opportunity of their change from birth up to now.
Thus, the course of a history in fairy tales of Kipling
has rather interrupted and uneven, character. Therefore, the heroes of
Kipling's fairy tales, as well as folklore are deficient of psychologies. They
exist as the constant reality is given as a punishment or as award for their
behavior at beginnings of life on Earth. The researchers are marked the
original English humor of the writer, for example, in fairy tale of “Elephant
calf”.
The author in fairy tales in oneself is keenness
on game along with explanations of come into the world of a present kind of
animals. Have been using fantastic methods, he has shown in amusing form like
occurrence of trunk at elephants so useful them. The “Elephant calf” has taken
a revenge of his relatives constantly treat badly with him. His curiosity
nearly has destroyed him, but after that has awarded of trunk.
The kids who have got in trouble, in fairy tales
of Kipling always there are find advisers and defenders, and assistants so as
for “Elephant calf” was a Python, Rocky and Snake which not given to a
Crocodile to eat curious “Elephant calf’ which tried to find out about that
Crocodiles have for dinner. Thus for “Elephant calf’ being threatened of life
has turned back of functional purchase. Moreover, all his relatives have gone
to beg Crocodile for presented them same useful nose - trunk.
In a fairy tale of “Whence have undertaken
battleship” the author have to learn a small readers to resource fullness on
example of such heroes as “Spitfire -prickly" hedgehog and the Turtle Slow
are outwitted a Jaguar and his mother, they have exchange the roles in form of
protective means.
Thereof have appeared a Battleships: “Certainly,
in other places there are still both Hedgehogs and Turtles (there are in my
garden), but the best and cleverest of them - ancient Hedgehogs and the Turtles
covered sheets as fir come like in long time ago was lived on muddy coast of
Amazon, - those are always called Battleships because they are such reasonable”
[6]. The author does makes readers in a role of witnesses how has come into the
world a new animals so thus to stand at beginnings of life on Earth.
In a fairy tale “As first letter was written” on
a vivid example has been shown a necessity of understanding between people:
tegumayskj tribe and Stranger (from tevarzev) and girl Taffi. The author
emphasizes, that action passed over Stone Age, but the knowledge of other
languages is shown as a modern problem on example of Taffi it is emphasized,
that little girls are still not so like to study to read and write, but with
pleasure draw a pictures and love “to play quietly somewhere nearby to daddy
just as Taffi here is also the discrete chronology is available too: to readers are shown only Taffi and customs of modern girls.
Thus, the author gives an opportunity to imagine
that, shat were happened hot in mentioned period between the Stone Age and the modernity. Probably, anything remarkable did not happen, therefore little girls still behave, as
Taffi. This mentioning involuntarily have been intrigues their own mystery and uncertainty.
The children are involved in creative process
and compelled with the help of imagination to carry out connection of times,
and also to be make sure of prospective correctness of the author - creator. In
the well- known fairy tale of “a Cat walked in itself' the narration is
conducted as usually, from far away when “the Domestic Animal was Animals
Wild”. The gradual process of domestication Dogs and Horse and Cows are shown
but only the Cat was escaping the common lot and continued “to wander at one's
will and walked in it”.
The writer has put forward the version both of
family nascent and home and also relations between people and animals and again
about contracts were concludes since long time ago when the world was just new
which are kept till now. It is spoken nothing about how these contracts between
people, the Dog and the Cat whether they varied or unvaried, without nuances
and whether it is valid just a same or as were initially.
This constant of an invariance of the world from
the beginning till these days is an original dash as discrete chronology. The description
between the beginning and the modernity are interrupts and it serves as original
confirmation of author's correctness, that it was a real, therefore nothing is
change and that way could not change.
In
a fairy of “the Moth which has stamped a leg” the historic figure – Tsar Solomon and
son David is shown. But exactly this fairy tale have abounds with plenty of
fantastic essences such as (Afrits and Genie's) and with magics. The first one
main tsarina Balkida with the help of the Moth has helped to Solomon to appease
once and for all once all his numerous shrew's wives.
That is again when the author has designated the
beginning and the end of a history and having written, that since the Solomon
and Balkida were lived happily up to death. That was between these basic events
had kept, as always, outside of the text, only in imagination of readers. The
writer snatch away the most significant and fatal events from a life of heroes
and the rest for author does not represent interest and he doesn't want to take
the trouble with the description of insignificant incidents because of his viewpoint.
It is as usual privilege of national fairy tales in which, as a rule, the
characters of heroes doesn’t have varied and there are no metamorphosis’s whit
them.
In “Ricky-Tiki-Tavi” fairy tale the mongoose is
not skilled, but his the brute movable though before he never was hunting
independently and his fighter manners are own since a birth. He always know how
to behave with enemies: “More one minute the mongooses in general haven’t
afraid though Ricky-Tiki-Tavi never saw before such a lot of analive
cobrabecause of mother to breast-feed being deed end tie wellunderstood,
that mongooses are exist to battle with snakes, to be victorious over snake [8].
His victory is a pledge of that in further not any cobra will be squeeze
through a fence of this house die mongoose have saved a whole family: Teddi and
his parents.
The connection between people and an animal is
shown. The brave of main hero Riki-Tiki-Tavi are admires people because it like
close friend and the savior and the writer have emphasized an invariance of
these relations by his own typical way such as - discrete chronology.
The most well-known fairy tale is “Books of
Jungle" about Maugly are belonging to a number of “animalism” of Kipling's
stories. The Kipling have allocated animals with features of human mentality .
The life of animals provided to be an allegoric image of a life of human
society” [9].
The writer have to undertakes again to tell
about Universe evolution, but the discrete chronology is shown more unusually:
first of elephants Tha has taked out a Jungle from deep waters, so had created
Jungle. It was the first one to promulgate a law under which all subsequent
generations of animals began to live. His descendant named Hathi was the main
keeper and myrmidon of the law in Jungle just he was annihilated a village with
his sons from where the inhabitants have expelled Maugly, except him nobody
could not find common language with animals.
The main hero Maugly being evolved among animals
selflessly loved him, close to nature much better feels himself in Jungle
because human self-interest are alien to him by reason of their avidity,
falsity, meanness, garrulity that why he was indignate with people which kill
just “because of idleness and for fan”. The Maugly has returned precious ancas with
rubies and other rare stones because of him six person have killed each other
wishing to own it. For Maugly the main things are: friendship, fidelity,
nobleness, mind except mother (Messua) unfortunately, have nobody that he met
these qualities.
At the end the Maugly should return to people
because of loneliness: he feeling like the master of Jungle but anyway to felt
a need for people though of their defects. However, some researchers considered that the Maugly was deprived of social value: “have
been developing the theory of “the
natural person”, the Kipling was denying the image of Maugly social value.
The decoding of separate images sometimes finds
out their invisible
reactionism. For example, how the leader Akea have to rule over the wolfs
troop, the statement of discipline and primitive civil code have felt. The
imperialistic point into the description of war with Dholy which appear as the
lowest race. The Kipling as it was marked by contemporaries have been
condemning a mob of “Bandarlogs” - monkeys as allegoric satire on the French
bourgeois democracy and also on parliamentarism hated by him” [10].
The Maugly without social prejudices is a person
of the future of Indian society which till now shares on castes. The period
when the Maugly was helping to the person, who had failed in a hole from a
caste untouchable, the rural foremen hadthreatened him with in change into untouchable.
The Maugly with his morals was too good in front of an imperfect human society
his victory over main Enemies (Sher-khan and red dogs) is also asconfidential
friendship with the most powerful representatives of Jungle such as (Kaa and
Bagiraand Baly ) do not made him arrogant.
The Maugly always keep quiet and kind. The Kaa
and Bagira and Baly and Mother – wolf constantly had admitted with love to
Maugly which always can be proved with affairs. The Maugly had grown in
atmosphere of sincere love and nobleness, fearlessness unsuccessfully tried to
find all this at people and he wasn’t be capable to ratify these laws in a society
of people which first of all are possessed by greedy of gain.
The only one thing that could make a Maugly is
to wipe a village off the face of the earth which has expelled him with the
help of the wild brothers, so the Maugly was rus between the world of people
and animals. In comparison with the last the people in many respects had
yielded to them. The Maugly may to be compare with. Certainly he is tragically
person suffering because of lost soul.
The author eventually had determined his
destiny: “In criticism the opinion have expressed, that the stories of Kipling
about animals - are the best completely are laying outside of sphere of his
imperialistic sights. However the Kipling's ideology along side have been
enters into figurative system of his narration about the person - fighter. It
is shown not only in an epilogue of history of Maugly and in story of “In a
wood” where proud Maugly “is civilized” and going to work to the English forest
warden which giving him at disposal of white “Sagib” all of his richest
knowledge of local nature”: the wholeconception of
stories about Jungle – as well as a cycle of poems art accompanying to them and also to reflects in
oneself the characteristic featuresof
the writer outlook [11].
The Maugly closer stood to the world of the nature and
being a partyto mostancient history
of Jungle which told by his friend Hathi was descendant of the founder of
Jungle – That
must be return to people which wasn’t respected as animals.
The Kipling always areinterested of question either
about worldevolution
or how it was or cherished secrets and sources and
the whole of all. That
way in the fairy tales he realized the own interest, have been
creating theoriginal
theory of evolution of species in general of all alive.
The Kipling was less interesting about what will
happen after, than the evolution may be because of presence the other ways of
life development and was it happen, the writer have viewed as a constant
magnitude which is not bringing anything new. Exact this absence of evolution
is also created a discrete chronology In fairy tales beginning with evolution
of the Universe.
THE LITERATURE
1.
A history of the English literature. - M, 1958. p. 272.
2.
The foreign literature of 20 centuries. - M.. 1973. p.169.
3.
Anikin G.B. A history of the English literature. - M. 1975, p. 359.
4.
Kipling R. "Fairy tales" – M., 1979, p. 11.
5.
Kipling R. "Fairy tales". – M., 1979. p. 20.
6.
Kipling R. "Fairy tales". – M., 1979, p.50
7.
Kipling R. “Fairy tales”. – M., 1979, p.73
8.
Kipling R. "Fairy tales". – M., 1979. p. 119.
9.
Anikin G.B. A history of the English literature. – M., 1975, with. 359.
10.
The foreign literature of XX century. – M., 1973. p. 168.
11. A history of the English literature. – M., 1958. p. 270.