Candidate of pedagogical sciences, U.R.Kanseitova, G.J.Hairlaeva

Kazakh State Women’s Teacher Training University, Kazakhstan.

 

TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS OF SELF-WORKING.

 

 

   It is very important to form self working in children from early times. Teacher should motivate children and involve them into the lesson. Children must love the lesson and come to the lessons with good expectations. Young children, if they are normal, want to learn. “At no other time in life does the human being display such enthusiasm for learning, for living, for finding out.” (Pluckrose 1979:27). Lifelong attitudes appear to be formed early. If teachers can manage to capture children’s enthusiasm and keep it by presenting well-planned lessons, right for their needs and development level, the children they teach should make progress and find that they are good at English. It is at this first stage of learning English that foundations for what may be a life-long interest in English that foundations for what may be a life-long interest in English language and culture can be laid.

     The word “self-working” is used to refer to situations in which a learner, with others, or alone, is working without the direct control of a teacher. This might be for short periods within a lesson, for whole lessons, or in the extreme case of learner autonomy, where he undertakes the whole of his learning without the help of teacher.

 Self-working is concerned with responsibility in learning. Individuals who are involved in  self-working have undertaken some additional responsibility for their own learning which in other circumstances would be held on their behalf by a teacher. Clearly, learners can be involved in self-working to various degrees. For some it may be total, so that no teacher is involved at all; for others – the more likely situation – self-working will be part of a package involving both conventional teaching and self-working.

    The main key to understanding this terminology concerns the concept of responsibility for learning and wherein the responsibility lies. The act of learning something must always be a personal, individual act. Traditionally, the teacher is responsible for setting up this organization and managing it in the classroom. Alwright (1978) has noted that the teacher is responsible for a daunting list of management tasks, and suggests that the responsibility for at least some of them might be shared with learners. The tasks he notes include such things as determining goal, making decisions about materials, deciding how the materials will be used, keeping records, evaluating progress, allocating time to tasks, deciding on what tasks will be done, and who should do them, what groupings the learners will work in and so on.

 One view of self-working is that in which the teacher seeks to include the learners increasingly in this decision-making process  about their learning and the management of it; the teacher seeks to transfer to the learners an increasing degree of responsibility for their own learning. In this view, an autonomous learner is one who is totally responsible for making and implementing all of the decisions concerned with his own learning.

   An opposing view is one which the materials and resources for learning are written and organized in such a way that the decision making and much of management of the learning are built into the materials. In this view, the learners’ responsibility may be limited to matters concerning when the work takes place, and perhaps which parts of the programme to work on at particular times.

-Self working. Thus is a neutral term referring generally to situations which learners are working without the direct control of the teacher.

-Self-direction. This term describes a particular attitude to the learning task, where the learner accepts responsibility for all the decisions concerned with his learning but does not necessarily undertake the implementation of those decisions.

-Autonomy. This term describes the situation in which the learner is totally responsible for all of the decisions concerned with his learning and the implementation of those decisions. In full autonomy there is no involvement of a “teacher” or an institution. And the learner is also independent of specially prepared materials.

-Semi autonomy. This conveniently labels the stage at which learners are preparing for autonomy.

-Self-access materials. These are materials appropriate to and available for self working.

-Self-access learning. This is self working using these materials. The term is neutral as to how self-directed or other-directed the learners are.

-Individualized instruction.   Once again this term is neutral as it as: “a learning process which is adapted to a particular individual, taking this individual’s characteristics into consideration.”

   The term self-direction is different from the others in the list in that it refers to attitudes rather than techniques or even modes of working. Self-access learning, or individualized instruction, for example, refer to modes of learning in that they are concerned with the activities of the learner, the teacher and their interaction. Self-directed learning, in contrast describes an attitude to learning in which the learner accepts responsibility for his learning, but he does not necessarily carry out courses of action independently in connection with it. Consequently, a learner may be self-directed and yet following a conventional teacher-led class; similarly a self-directed learner may follow any one of the possible self-instructional modes. Indeed in this latter case, the chances of the success are greatly enhanced if the learner is self-directed; and if the self working mode is learner-centred, then self-direction is a requirement for success.

Self-direction, then, is a second key to understanding self working. But what does it mean to be self-directed? What does it mean to take responsibility for one’s own learning? Self-direction refers to a particular attitude towards learning, one in which the learner is prepared to take responsibility for his own learning. This idea frequently strikes teachers as impossibly idealistic and unrealistic, so it is worth examining it in detail. In fact, outside of the context of education, we take responsibility for a whole range of things, many of which we know little about. The first point to be made about this, then, is to distinguish between being responsible for something, and carrying out courses of action arising from that responsibility. To be responsible for something does not entail having to carry out the courses of action arising from it.

  The situation is similar with respect to self-directed learning. The self-directed learner retains responsibility for all aspects of the management of his learning but will probably seek expert help and advice for many of these. Even those learning in conventional classes with highly directive teachers can retain responsibility for their own learning in this sense, although their scope for assisting with the management of their learning will be greatly curtailed.

  A self-directed learner, then, is one who retains responsibility for the management of his own learning. If the learner, in addition, undertakes all these management tasks himself, then he is also autonomous, that is, he no longer requires help from a teacher to organize his learning. However, it is worth noting here that many autonomous learners work with others in their learning- autonomy does not imply isolation.

     In conclusion, We want to say that self working is very important part of teaching English. It is one kind of methods in methodology. Nowadays this method is more used in schools.

REFERENCE

1.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Dickinson,L. 1987 “Self-instruction in Language Learning” Cambridge  Cambridge University  Press. 

2.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Holec, H 1988 Autonomy and Self-directed Learning Present Fields of Application Np Council of Europe.

3.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Jones, F R 1993 “Beyond the fringe a framework for assessing  teach yourself materials for ab initio English-speaking learners” System 21 453-69.

4.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Jones, F R 1994 “The lone language learner a diary study” System 22 441-54

5.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Kenny, E 1993 “For more autonomy” System 21 431-42