Enhancing
Second Language Acquisition
Bulatova D.B.
Student of Eurasian National University after L. N. Gumilyov, Faculty of
Philology, department of the theory and practice of foreign languages,
Astana, Kazakhstan
Yekibayeva N.A.
Associate Professor, Eurasian National University after L. N. Gumilyov,
Faculty of Philology, department of the theory and practice of foreign
languages
Astana, Kazakhstan
Key words: a language acquisition, second language
skills
A language acquisition is the process by which humans
acquire the capacity to perceive and comprehend language, as well as to produce
and use words and sentences to communicate. Language acquisition is one of the
quintessential human traits, because non-humans do not communicate by using
language.
Second language skills - is the ability to use
language (receptive) and express (expressive) information. is the set of skills
that enables a person to convey information so that it is received and understood.
Áұë
ìàқàëà àäàìíûң өç³í³ң àíà ò³ë³íåí áөëåê åê³íø³ ò³ë îқó ïðîöåññ³í çåðòòåéä³. Ñîíûң
áàðûñûíäà ðåöåïò³ê қàá³ëåòò³ң êөìåã³í àéқûíäàéäû.
Ñòàòüÿ
ïîñâÿùåíà èçó÷åíèþ ñïåöèôèêè îáó÷åíèÿ âòîðîãî èíîñòðàííîãî ÿçûêà â äîïîëíåíèå
ðîäíîãî.  ñòàòüå ðàññìîòðåíû ðåöåïòèâíûå íàâûêè â îáó÷åíèè âòîðîãî
èíîñòðàííîãî ÿçûêà.
The
article is devoted to the process of second language acquisition and mainly
focuses on study through receptive skills.
Second language
acquisition is the process by which people learn languages in addition to their
native language. The term second language is used to describe any language
whose acquisition starts after early childhood. The term “language acquisition”
became commonly used after Stephen Krashen contrasted it with formal and non-constructive
“learning” [1, 41]. Today, most scholars use “language learning” and “language
acquisition” interchangeably, unless they are directly addressing Krashen’s
work.
A language
acquisition takes place when the learners realize how meaning is expressed
accurately. Acquisition is possible even without production practice. There is
a high correlation between listening and general language development. One of
the rarely found non-north American listening-based studies was carried out by
Damhuis in Netherlands. The results strengthened the view that a
comprehension-based activity along with communicative oriented ones facilitates
second language acquisition.
A language can be
defined in many ways. Perhaps the best definition of language comes from Bloom.
She defines language as a code whereby ideas are represented through a
conventional system of arbitrary signals for communication. According to this
definition, to communicate through language, a person must first have an idea,
and then arrange some symbol system such a way that another person can process
those symbols and draw from them intended meaning.
As linguists we
should understand that language skills cannot be taught separately, but we must
focus on certain skills to obtain more knowledge and to know the language.
Developing of receptive skills, namely reading and listening skills is
essential, because these two skills are very demanding to master in their
language acquisition.
For a second
language learner the importance of listening comprehension can never be over
emphasized. Receptive language is the comprehension of language – listening and
understanding what is communicated. In fact, listening comprehension precedes
production in all cases of language learning, and it stands to reason that there
can be no production unless linguistic input is provided and becomes
comprehensible intake for the learner. It involves being attentive to what is
said, the ability to comprehend the message, the speed of processing the
message, and concentrating on the message. Receptive language includes
understanding figurative language, as well as literal language.
When being at
practice in the 5th school in Astana, we have come up to the
conclusion that listening is one of the fundamental skills of language, and as
such it merits four skill areas for language students. As Hasan A. pointed out,
“listening comprehension provides the right conditions for language acquisition
and development of other language skills” [2, 138].
Since listening
comprehension can enhance the process of language learning and facilitate
language acquisition, students also mustn’t be afraid to speak, because there
are several types of advantages can result from giving preeminence to the
listening activity, through which students can develop their speaking skills:
cognitive, efficiency, utility, and affective. The cognitive advantage of an
initial emphasis on listening is its respect for a more natural way to learn a
language, for processing and decoding aural input requires recognition knowledge,
whereas encoding and generating speech output requires retrieval knowledge
[3,331].
The majority of
people, especially students believe that teachers shouldn’t be the slaves of
their course books and to be more creative in organizing the lesson and the
lesson material. Of course, we have come to the conclusion that teachers should
choose their material wisely, according to purposes of students and their
needs. We do not deny, that certain texts may be omitted, because of the lack
of time or because of their irrelevance, but we also know that in many cases
teachers focus on the speaking skills of learners. Therefore, in our opinion
teachers must to plan the lesson material in way where all four skills could be
developed equally, or every lesson should focus learners’ attention on one
skill scrupulously.
For efficient
results of developing reading skills teacher must define the reading purposes,
which will develop subskills in reading skill. McDonough and Show believe that
it is important to match reading skill to reading purpose [4, 95]. The
activities depend on the type of the text we are dealing with, whether it is a
short story, dialogue, a letter or the article, whether it is an individual
reading or a group reading. When being at practice in the school #1 in Almaty
region I mixed students in groups with different abilities where they take
turns reading out loud to each other. There were the tasks with 4-5 paragraphs
and each student was responsible for one of the paragraphs. Every student was
supposed to read out loud the text to his group and they analyzed new words,
discussed. Slower learners feel less intimidated and participate better.
In addition, the
increasingly popular communicative approach to language has given a new
dimension to the importance of receptive skills in communication. Hence Krashen
and Terrell stated that “acquisition can take place only when people understand
messages in the target language” [5,180]. After all, communication is not a
monologue. It seems logical that one needs to hear sounds before producing
them; that in order to speak a language one must have "a 'feel' for the
sounds and be able to understand a message".
Several
conditions must be met to communicate using language. First, it is crucial to
remember that language is not only expressed, but for communication to occur,
the language must also be received. When people send a message, they are using
expressive language: when they receive a message, they are using receptive
language. We are communicating with any person through language; we are using
expressive language, putting our ideas into symbols. Person are using receptive
language, processing those symbols so that you can understand our ideas. If
person, understand our ideas we communicated. The process involved in
expressive language is encoding, putting ideas into code, and the process
involved in receptive language is decoding, taking ideas out of code.
Learning skills
frequently overlap and influence each other throughout the learning process.
Learners have individual learning style, and teachers should try to help them
the knowledge in this way. In teaching the language skills a greater focus
should be put on the needs of the learners and their purposes for learning the
languages.
References:
1.Second Language Acquisition and
Second Language Learning . Stephen D. Krashen, University of Southern
California 2002. Page 41.
2. Hasan,
A. (2000). Learners' perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Journal
of Language, Culture and Curriculum, 137-152.
3. Gilman,
R. A. & Moody, L. M. (1984). What practitioners say about listening:
Research implications for the classroom. Foreign Language Annals, page 331.
4. McDonough J. and C. Shaw (2003).
Materials and Methods in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T.
S. (2001). The natural approach. In Approaches and Methods in Language
Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, page 180.