Ìåäèöèíà / 7.Êëèíè÷åñêàÿ ìåäèöèíà.
Yurtsenyuk O.S.
Higher education institution in Ukraine «Bukovinian State Medical University»
PROBLEMS OF ADAPTATION OF FOREIGN STUDENTS
Culture is an intricate concept with many different classification.
Simply put , «Culture» refers to group or community with which we share common experiences
that shape the way be understand the world. If we can define the very
nomenclature of culture, the very first thought that occurs to our mind is
that, «Culture is a composite
entity which exceeds all parameters of civilization and hence it is the total
entity of human growth which is never confined to time, place, nationality and
even history too». Culture
is a state of consciousness individually and collectively which can make men free
from animality, physicality and vitality which are
the primary stages of human evolution.
India as we all know is a multicultural
democratic nation believing in “Unity is Diversity”. But not everyone is
comfortable when it comes to getting acquainted in a different culture than
theirs’. It is human mentality which many a times is not open to multicultural
environment and that leads to a reserved society of knowledge which is
distributed culturally.
Communication that too effective one is a
major challenge and a huge hurdle that one comes across when working with
people of different cultures in an educational establishment. The effective or
lack of communication as a result of cultural diversity leads to misunderstood
concepts, confusion among information giver-gainer and vice versa, low morale
and thus leading o substandard knowledge.
Each of us is shaped by many factors and
culture is one of the powerful forces that influences our lives. It is upon us
how we break the barrier of communication in multicultural learning
environment.
As
part of the
Medical Outcomes Study (MOS), a multi-year, multi-site study to
explain variations in patient outcomes,
RAND developed the 36-Item Short Form Health
Survey (SF-36). SF-36 is a set of generic,
coherent, and easily administered
quality-of-life measures. These
measures rely upon patient self-reporting and are
now widely utilized by managed
care organizations and by Medicare
for routine monitoring and assessment of care
outcomes in adult patients.
The
RAND 36-Item Health Survey
(Version 1.0) taps eight health concepts:
physical functioning, bodily pain, role
limitations due to physical health
problems, role limitations due to personal or
emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health
perceptions. It also includes a single item that
provides an indication of perceived
change in health. These 36 items, presented here, are identical
to the MOS SF-36 described in Ware
and Sherbourne (1992). They were adapted
from longer instruments completed by patients participating
in the Medical
Outcomes Study (MOS), an observational study of variations
in physician practice styles and patient outcomes
in different systems of health
care delivery (Hays & Shapiro, 1992; Stewart, Sherbourne, Hays, et al.,
1992). A revised version of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (Version 1.1) that differs sightly from Version 1.0 in terms of
item wording is currently in
development.
Procedure
for the MOS SF-36 has been distributed
by the International
Resource Center for Health Care
Assessment (located in Boston, MA). The scoring method
described here persons using this scoring
method should refer to the
instrument as RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.
Scoring
the RAND 36-Item Health Survey is a two-step process. First,
precoded numeric values are recoded
per the scoring
key given in Table 1. Note
that all items are scored
so that a high score defines
a more favorable health state. In
addition, each item is scored
on a 0 to 100 range so that
the lowest and highest possible
scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible
score achieved. In step 2, items
in the same
scale are averaged together to create the
8 scale scores. Table 2 lists the
items averaged together to create
each scale. Items that are
left blank (missing data) are
not taken into account when
calculating the scale scores. Hence,
scale scores represent the average
for all items
in the scale
that the respondent answered.
It is established that the quality of
students’ life mainly depend
on the course of learning, ,
among the 1-2 courses students the average level
of life quality
was 26,56+6.34 points, while on the 4-5 courses was
51,94+4.10 points.
Analyzing the indicators
of the life quality in the sexual distribution can be stated
about the lower results in the women for all indicators
than the men, which is probably
due to the personal characteristics women's perceptions of the social problems, a tendency towards the dramatization and unstable hormonal background. So the absolute performance
physical functioning in the women compared with the men was 34,72+4.90 points –
41,91+5.50 points respectively.
The established results
point to the problem of
adaptation among the foreign students that must be
considered when creating the training and the psycho-correction programs for this cohort
of students.