A.Orazbaeva
c.p.s
A.Baitursinov
Kostanay state university
LEGAL LINGUISTIC METHODS OF DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNICATIVE MUTUAL
RELATIONS OF CONFLICTING TEXTS IN A REALISTIC CATEGORY
Juris
linguistics language jurisdiction and people interaction language image works.
Jurisdiction possibilities of the language are made through language form which
appeared from social interaction of users and defined from language forms
peculiarities, through lows and norms. Juris linguistic aspects of
metalinguistic and its ontological basics are as a considered low language. We
don’t have to forget that together with social life communication examination
it assists aesthetically. That is why should be experienced keeping language
clean, because it is resource of showing aesthetical level in social life
communication. The results of
negligence of language norms can be moral or criminal. In any division of
social surrounding can be noticed that language norm is being spoiled. In such
cases conscience of people should be protected in front of the low. Linguistic
expertise can help to solve criminal cases like honor, conscience, and respect
and business position, accuse, foul language and etc. objection matters in a
court process. In the process of learning juris linguistic matters language and
its meaning, users of that language (as subject and object of jurisprudence),
together with the system of legislation and understanding it (functions of
legislation system department of interpretation and legislation of normal
language), also being the subject of diagnostic (linguistic diagnostic
functions demanding special linguistic competence about questions of language’s
theory and practice) usage of language provided under the low. By this we can
see essential two problems and they lay in all primary researches of juris
linguistics. First of all it is the
matter of connection of low language to the jurisprudence. Secondly, matters of
comparison of the low language peculiarities to the matters of normal and low
languages. In juris linguistic these matters comes as continuation of
linguistic evolution of normal language. Opinion that language lows
jurisdiction and norms of low language have various communicative divisions of
social life, in jurisprudence it is seen as organic development: “Language
function coming out from constructional linguistic, shows
communicational-pragmatic function, in the language examination brings to the
new way of antropocentristical researches. This fact brings to life outcome of
new researches, different scientific opinions” [1], - our colleagues confirmed.
Juris linguistics from all mixed language lows give privilege to the consisted
from determination and language with its own low, elemental with natural
history language.
Nowadays new goal of linguistic is
connected with juris linguistic it is mutual matters of jurisprudence and
linguistics. Legal materials are very important in the practice. Jurisprudence
plays an important role in managing low technic and understanding it, also in
formalization different documents linguistic aspects. Juris linguistic protects
norms of art language and language of mass media from rough lexicon. Now it is
said that linguistic in the role of communicative-pragmatic has new
goal-responsibilities.
Lingua juristic observes the low that
organized throughout examining language-rights phenomenon. Main goal of lingua juristic- check under the low
language and on the basis of language happening during social occasions
interactions. And juris linguistic- explains normal language (its low and
policy) under jurisprudence alternation meaning.
Besides of above mentioned aspects of
juris linguistic have to speak about useful and additional functions. It is
important to mention social juris linguistic meaning. Here exudes connection of
linguists and lowers.
Language matters in jurisprudence known as self-regulating
research method in the division of linguistic science need including it into
scientific research process. Bearing in mind “Juridical” part of language and juris
linguistic questions, many works have a lot of divergence in giving devotion to
the linguistic peculiarities. Specifics
of language divisions can be definite and accomplished through linguistic
methods. Only outcomes of linguistic researches take language as a foundation
of low, juris linguistics is mutual division of linguistics and jurisprudence,
the theory and practice requirement of its objectives can be method of
research, it shows not only our article but many other works: “Analyze
theoretical and practical questions on the edge of language and low,
linguistics and jurisprudence brings to imitations of exceptional directions of
scientific researches – of juris linguistics,- which occupies the problems of
interaction of normal language and juridical one, essential low of language
being and lows particularized by low for regulation social conflicts related
with language practice in unlike ranges of social life”.
As mentioned above lingua juristic deals
with legislative aspects of linguistic, that is why it can be in the juris
linguistic sphere. If juris linguistic can determine the level (meaning) of the
vision of normal language in legislative documents or court process, lingua
juristic in its turn deals with implementing
them to the legislative court practice. For example juris linguistic on
the basis of linguistics’ information makes scale (quantity) of language
lexicon, in that vision of language scale by protecting people’s honor,
dignity, conscience by the meaning of low brings to life unique low
qualification. Juris linguistic through normal language explains low passages
and its concerned lingua jurists as well, if to say exact their method of explanation kept under the low.
In
republic’s juris linguistic theory and practice matters national language
should take an exceptional place in the research and implementing them to the
scientific movement. In that objective main direction is to form able to
compete in national language juris
linguistic.
List of literature
1.“Future and problems of national language in
legislation of Republic of Kazakhstan” materials of Republic
scientific-research. Astana, 2010.
2.N.N.Ivakina. Professional speech of lower: study
material.1997.348p.