Ôèëîëîãè÷åñêèå
íàóêè/1.Ìåòîäèêà
ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ ÿçûêà è ëèòåðàòóðû
Natalia
Solomchak
Ivano-Frankivsk
National Technical University, Ukraine
Problem of Authenticity through Project Work
Methodology
The problem of making ESP course
more learner-centered and learning-centered, and, thereby, more communicative
is always discussed from the point of view of authenticity. The authenticity
idea develops naturally from a communicative orientation to language teaching.
In ESP course it goes without saying that students should be exposed to the
authentic language materials, authentic tasks, authentic situations. It would
be a mistake to assume that all the above-mentioned authenticity factors can be
achieved without learner authenticity which means students’ appropriate
responses and positive psychological reaction to all the materials and
classroom activities.
For years it has been taken for granted
that students majoring in technical specialties have only a reading need in
English. Hence, the teaching methodology and all the classroom activities were
reading-based. All the teaching
materials were texts taken from the students’ major fields. In this way the
linguistic authenticity of the ESP course was strengthened. Such a narrow focus
on reading was boring and non- motivating for students because it forced them
to move from frustration to frustration. The mere presence of subject-related
or authentic content in materials does not necessarily guarantee the increase
of students’ motivation. Sometimes even excellent science texts may generate
very limited opportunities for language work, and very often they prevent the
language teacher from fully participating in the classroom communication
because they demand a high level of specialist knowledge. The authenticity of
such an ESP course as a language learning and teaching course may be seriously
weakened.
The results of the three years
experimental research and practical classroom activities in the groups of the
first-year students majoring in petroleum engineering have proved that to
remedy the situation and to create the authenticity of all the types
(authenticity of language, task, situation and authenticity of students’
experience), students should be involved in developing and carrying out their
own project tasks integrated into the professionally-oriented content-based
teaching/learning process.
By integrating project work into
content-based classroom activities, ESP teachers create the vibrant learning
environment that require active student involvement, stimulate higher level
thinking skills, and give students responsibility for their own learning, thus
providing an excellent solution to the problem of both authenticity and
autonomy of students. They can use work involving all other skills areas
(listening, speaking, and writing) and a great deal else besides to teach
effective communication, and to meet the requirements of the
professionally-oriented or authentic situations.
Project work methodology has proved to be
particularly effective in ESP classes.
The authentic feel
of project work and the fact that the students are personally involved in the
learning process provide the motivation that comes from within.
The ESP teachers can develop more
flexible attitude towards the students’ work. They can now act as consultants,
and what is more important, they can always rely on the practical help and
advice of their colleagues from the specialist departments.
The present study
focuses on the problem specific for ESP teachers at technical universities. The
problem is how to build the bridge that would help to eliminate the
psychological gap between teaching oral communicative skills for everyday life
that greatly inspires our students’ interest and teaching skills in technical
reading, and professionally-oriented communication in the field that is usually
considered by our students majoring in petroleum engineering to be a dull and
uninspired job.
To solve this problem and to teach
professional speaking, writing, reading and listening within an integrated
skills approach we have introduced project work into our syllabus. The project
work methodology can be defined as an integrated pedagogical and language
activity that successfully combines simulations, role-plays and various forms
of discussion. We consider the project
work methodology to be one of the best among many innovative teaching
technologies and approaches.
Project work is appropriate to all
levels of knowledge and provides the complete solution of the problem of
authenticity of task for students. Project work solves the problem of learner
autonomy by giving students the opportunity to choose the methods and
approaches, to decide the project schedule, etc. It is students-centered
activity. Project work provides high level of motivation because the students
are offered the opportunity of using the language skill already acquired in a
real professionally-oriented communicative situation. The most important is
that project work provides the simultaneous development of four integrated
skills: speaking, writing, listening and reading. Project work is a cooperative
rather than a competitive activity. It culminates in an end product that can be
shared with others, giving the project a real purpose. Unlike traditional
approaches to foreign language teaching which focus on accuracy by teaching
separated grammatical points and vocabulary items, this activity allows both
teacher and student to concentrate on the communicative use of language and
content rather than form.
Project work is not the easiest method
to implement. It requires a lot of preparatory work on the teacher’s part and
multiple stages of development to succeed. But its pay-offs are beneficial for
students and teachers alike.
The advantages of using project work
methodology in teaching and learning English have been experimentally proved. As we entered a new
millennium, the ability and the need to understand and communicate with each
other have become increasingly important. An international exchange of ideas
has become essential.
To meet these
communication needs, more and more individuals have highly specific academic
and professional reasons for seeking to improve their language skills.
The
diversity of language learners in diverse contexts needs tasks that should be
fashioned for a particular group, studying in a particular place with its own
particular opportunities and challenges. There is no one method which will be
suitable for everyone. The teacher should be inspired to change and to experiment.
But he may be limited by a number of institutional factors. Among these may be
regulations which demand a certain curriculum content, budgetary constraints
which will dictate class size and number of hours, an old-fashioned text book,
or an obligation to teach in a certain way (grammar-translation “method” for
example). An inexperienced teacher has to overcome this.