Ahmetova L. S.
Senior
Lecturer, MA in History
Kostanay
state university named after A. Baytursynov
Kazakhstan,
Kostanay
Islam and democracy: issues about compatibility of
values and principles.
Resolutions in Arab countries which caused last years
again raised the questions about compatibility of democracy principles and
Islam values. Many different questions exist about this issue among Western
scholars and Muslims also think about it.
First of all,
there is a need to begin with the notion of democracy and its political
interpretations and than raise the question about their compatibility, relying
on some of the fundamental provisions of the Koran.
Democracy in classic Western sense is a regime where
rule is determined by people. People choose the ruler and can remove him power.
Democracy gives people the right to choose the direction of the development of
society in any field: economical, public, cultural and political. This regime
gives all people equality to the law. There are not repressions or political
persecutions in the countries with democratic regime.
Democratic
regime uses such measures as elections, referendums, majority rule, variety of
political parties, right of minority opposition, freedom of media and
independence of judges. To cut a long story short, democracy means that the
source of power is human-being and human-being has a right to decide what is
allowed and what is not.
The most
famous Muslim thinkers (Abdo, Taymiyya and Ibn-Khaldun), modern political
scientists of Arab countries(Rauf Izzat, Muktadir Khan and Shadi Hamid) and
scientists-imams (Yusuf Qaradawi) rely on Koran and Hadith of the Prophet and
prove that there is not contradiction between democracy as political regime in
which instructs such regime.
For example, Islam forbids to lead the prayer people
whom Muslims are dissatisfied. The first four caliphs were elected and decided
upon by the Ummah. Therefore, We can claim that democracy emerged from Islam.
Also there are a lot of examples that Muslims used to use the right to express
their opinion in current issues of political governance and in scientific
circles of lawyers. A lot of democratic methods were used by Muslims and now it
supports examples from the early history of Islam.
If we consider
the concept of democracy as majority rule and participation of people in
political decision-making process, we should call this process “Shura” or
collective meeting. Shura guided by Islam. Shura’s council is compulsory for
ruler. If the ruler is elected to such conditions, he has the right to cancel
this contract and rely on another opinion, because observance of accepted
conditions is mandatory for the Muslim.
Islamic Shura
is known to be close to democracy and essence of democracy corresponds to the
Islamic Shuira. Shura was made the foundations of Islamic life. Islam orders to
ruler to ask for advice.
Modern Western
society think that democracy is the regime where people elect rulers they want.
People ask them for their actions in order to reject dictates if they are
contrary to the Constitution. The same concept is inherent in Islam: “If the
rulers are ordered to commit a sin, you will not have to do it”. The best view
of Juhad is a speech which was made to criminal ruler. And it means that
resistanse to dictators and viciousness would be better before Allah than war
with an external enemy, because resistance can be the reason of war.
We can see
that Koran connects dictatorship and collapse of society which leads to
spiritual and moral degradation of the people. The word “Guluvv” is used in
Koran in respect of dictators. The Guluvv means exaltation and humiliating
submission of people. Koran condemns dictators who liken themselves to God and
censure people who resignedly follow the will of the dictator and blindly
follow the instructions. People are responsible or partly responsible for the
emergence of dictators, because they are politically passive. Islamic ruler is
not sinless authority. Ruler is just a man who can make a mistake or make the
right decision. The ruler can be justice or injustice. And the Muslims have a
right to correct him if he is wrong and direct him if he deviated from the
right path. From the Islamic perspective elections and voting is evidence that
the candidate is worthy to lead the society. A person who is eligible to vote
has to comply with. He should be honest, fair and should have a sense of duty
and responsibility. Perjury is a great sin. Those people who do not participate
in the elections violate Allah’s imperative to testify. Many islamists consider
that democracy contradict to Islam. And evidence that democracy is based on the
majority opinion. All issues are solved by vote and decision is executed.
Islam, by the way, has no such means and opinion is
not accepted only because majority of people consider it to be correct. The
situation is opposite, Islam considers the heart of the matter and tries to
find out is the decision match to the truth or not? If the decision matched to
the truth, it would accept even if only one man supports it. But if the decision
doesn’t match to the truth, it would be rejected even if it was supported by
99% of people.
To tell the truth, the Koran states that the
majority is always in a lie, followers of truth are always scarce. But logic
mind, Shariah and reality say: “The
decision has to accepted relying on something. If there are some controversies,
the opinion of majority has to be more relevant. And opinion of two people who
are closer to the truth has to be more important than the decision of one man.
Even if it is the voice of Prophet, only if it is not the opinion of Allah.”
We can be convinced than democracy is the
basic essence of Islam and its content has principles of freedom. But freedom
from the point of view of Islam doesn’t mean that the man is free from every
restrictions and regulations to the detriment of others, such “freedom” is
anarchy. Because of it Islam sets rules and regulations which ensure freedom of
everybody.
And it doesn’t mean that every democratic
country is Islamic. It means that every Islamic country has to be democratic
Literature:
1. H. Altay “Koran. Translations of the meanings” Almaty: “Ata-mura”,
1993,-198p.
2. H. Altay “Koran. Translations of the meanings” Almaty: “Ata-mura”,
1993,-207p.
3. The
collection of hadiths of the Prophet on various topics. Almaty: “Ata-mura”, 2003,-154p.
4. Yusuf
Qaradawi. Islamic consciousness: the
hope of the Arab homeland. “Vostok”,2002,-257p.