Ïñèõîëîãèÿ
è ñîöèîëîãèÿ/12. Ñîöèàëüíàÿ ïñèõîëîãèÿ
PhD in Psychology Lamash I. V.
Kharkiv national university of
internal affairs, Ukraine
Key Concepts
in Victimology: Foreign Research
Victimology is science of study of the relationship
between victims and violators of law or offenders.
As a concept, victimology is difficult to universally define, due to the
fact that different people define victimology in varying ways. At best, one can
only forward a broad definition of victimology and acknowledge that other
definitions do exist. As a “recently developed sub-discipline of criminology”
victimology focuses equally on victims as it does on crime[2].
The psychology of victims and the dynamics of victimhood have been
largely ignored by scholars and clinicians. While in past years the tendency
has been to blame victims, more recently the tide has turned. It is now
politically incorrect to explore the role of victims in violent systems, as
exploring the psychology of victims has become synonymous with blaming the
victim[4].
Within victimology, the victim’s experience, events leading to
victimisations, victimisations themselves and the response of society and
organisations to victimisations are all studied. To clarify, victimology
studies events where persons, institutions or communities are significantly
injured or damaged. In an academic sense, the term ‘victimology’ is translated
as ‘a system of knowledge’ of victims[3].
In modern victimology we can define the next key
concepts:
1.
“Victim” has it roots in the early religious notions of suffering, sacrifice
and death. This concept of “victim” was well known in the ancient
civilizations, especially in Babylonia, Palestine, Greece, and Rome. In each of
these civilizations the law mandated that the victim should be recognized as a person
who deserved to be made whole again by the offender.
2.
“Crime victim” is a person who has been physically, financially or emotionally
injured and/or had their property taken or damaged by someone committing a
crime.
3.
“Victimogenesis” refers to the origin or cause of a victimization; the
constellation of variables which caused a victimization to occur.
4.“Victim
Precipitation” a victimization where the victim causes, in part or totally,
their own victimization.
5.
“Vulnerability” is a physical, psychological, social, material or financial
condition whereby a person or an object has a weakness which could render them
a victim if another person or persons would recognize these weaknesses and take
advantage of them.
6.
“General Victim” is a person who has been physically, financially or
emotionally injured and/or had their property taken or damaged by someone, an
event, an organization or a natural phenomenon.
7.“Victimization”
refers to an event where persons, communities and institutions are damaged or injured
in a significant way. Those persons who are impacted by persons or events
suffer a violation of rights or significant disruption of their well being.
8.
“Victimology” is an academic scientific discipline which studies data that
describes phenomena and causal relationships related to victimizations. This
includes events leading to the victimization, the victim’s experience, its
aftermath and the actions taken by society in response to these victimizations.
Therefore, victimology includes the study of the precursors, vulnerabilities,
events, impacts, recoveries, and responses by people, organizations and
cultures related to victimizations.
9.“Abuse
of Power” is the violation of a national or international standard in the use
of organized powerful forces such that persons are injured physically,
mentally, emotionally, economically, or in their rights, as a direct and
intentional result of the misapplication of these forces.
10.“Victim
Assistance, Support or Services” are those activities which are applied in
response to victimizations with the intention of relieving suffering and
facilitating recovery. This includes offering information, assessments,
individual interventions, case advocacy, system advocacy, public policy and
programme development.
11.
“Victim Recovery” is the resumption of the same or better level of
functionality as was enjoyed prior to victimization. Persons who have been
victimized vary in their level of mental health and well-being prior to their
victimization. Consequently, victimization affects each person in a different
way
and
causes differing degrees of injury or trauma. In their recovery it is necessary
for victims to first try to regain their previous level of functioning plus
learn from their misfortune and hopefully exceed their previous level of
functionality. To be recovered suggests that a person has at least regained
their prior level of well-being and at best, has exceeded it. This state may be
measured by identifying their previous mental condition and determining if they
have at least regained that prior
status
using the criteria of: trust in others, autonomy of self, individual
initiative, competency in daily activities, self-identity, interpersonal
intimacy, control over personal situations, successful relationships, safety in
daily activities, acknowledgment of memory, trauma symptoms have become manageable,
self esteem is restored, resourcefulness is achieved, and there is an improved
ability to
ward
off potential threats.
12. “Child Abuse” is the intentional application of sexual, physical,
emotional or psychological injury to a child to include neglect at the hands of
her or his parents or care-provider within the confines of their family or
place of care.
13.
“Victim Offender Mediation” is a formal process for face-to-face meetings in
the presence of a trained mediator between a victim of a crime and his/her
offender who committed that crime. This is also called victim-offender
dialogue, victim-offender conferencing, victim-offender reconciliation, or
restorative justice. Often the victim and the offender are joined by their
respective families and community members or other persons related to the crime
event. In these meetings, the ffender
and the
victim talk to each other about the victimization, the effects it had on their
lives, and their feelings about it. The aim is to create a mutually agreeable
plan to repair any damage or injury that occurred as a result of the crime in
the hopes of permanently eliminating the conflict that caused the crime in the
first place.
14.
“Restorative Justice” is a systematic formal legal response to crime
victimization that emphasizes healing the injuries that resulted from the crime
and affected the victims, offenders and communities. This process is a
departure from the traditional retributive form of dealing with criminals and
victims which traditionally have generally perpetuated the conflict which
resulted in the original crime.
15.“Victim
Trauma” includes emotional and physical experiences that produce pain and
injuries. Emotional injury is a normal response to an extremely abnormal event.
It results from the pairing of a painful or frightening emotional experience
with a specific memory which emerge and have a long-lasting effect on the life
of a person. The more direct the exposure to the traumatic event, the higher the
risk for emotional harm and prolonged effects.
16.
“Crisis Intervention” is the provision of emergency psychological care to
traumatized victims so as to help them return to an adaptive level of
functioning and to prevent or mitigate the negative impact of psychological and
emotional trauma.
17.
“Compensation” is a formal administrative procedure provided by law which
provides only money to victims for “out of pocket” real expenses directly resulting
from the victimization to be paid by the state after the victim is found to
qualify according to specific criteria determined by the respective state or
federal law.
18.
“Restitution” is a formal judicial procedure used by a judge after guilt is determined
as part of a sentence which can provide money and/or services to the victim for
damages or suffering which resulted from the victimization to be paid or
performed by the offender.
19.“Victim
Survey” is a periodic data collection and analysis process conducted usually by
a government entity within the general population to study information about
crime victims regardless whether they reported their victimization to the
police or not. It typically uses a face-to-face or telephone interview (or sent
questionnaire) and covers demographics, attitudes about crime and details about
the victimizations experienced over the previous six months.
20.“Victim
Rights” are privileges and procedures required by written law which guarantee
victims specific considerations and treatment by the criminal justice system,
the government and the community at large[1].
In conclusion, these key concepts can be used in the development of
victimology as a field of study. Despite this, the continual development of the
study could potentially lead to improvement, and could therefore result in a
more successful development of victimology overall.
1. Dussich J.P.J. Victimology: Past, Present and
Future/ J.P.J. Dussich // Resource Material
Series. –
2006. - ¹70. - P 116-129.
2. Karmen A. Crime
Victims: An Introduction to Victimology/ A. Karmen. - Cengage Learning, 2012. - 560p.
3. Sebba L. Victimology and
the sociology of new disciplines A research agenda/L.Sebba, T. Berenblum//International
review of victimology. – 2014. – Ò. 20. – ¹. 1. – P. 7-30.
4. Zur O. Rethinking "Don't
Blame the Victim": Psychology of Victimhood/ O.Zur //Journal of
Couple Therapy. - 1994. - ¹4 (3/4). – Ð. 15-36.