Èëüáàëèåâà
À.Ø.
Àñòðàõàíñêèé
ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé òåõíè÷åñêèé óíèâåðñèòåò, Ðîññèÿ
Identification of the best
evaluation method of cost of the oil and gas entity
In
modern conditions in case of management of the oil and gas entity the value
assessment of the company is very demanded. Cost is a key indicator of
activities of the entity in the long-term period. This indicator characterizes
enhancement and development of the company. The value addition of the entity
leads to growth of investment appeal, and, therefore, and to growth of the
capital invested by shareholders.
The
company is investment goods, that is goods in which investments perform in hope
for return in the future. The amount of the expected return – the income – has
probabilistic nature therefore the buyer should consider risk of possible
failure. If future income taking into account time of their obtaining appears
less costs for acquisition of the company, it loses the attractiveness.
Strengthening
of influence of market factors on a condition and prospects of development of
the entities of an oil and gas complex and repeated complication of their
activities (including growth of cost value of the extracted hydrocarbons, in
connection with development of sea, superdeep and other capital-intensive
fields) has demanded search of the management system based on the criteria
capable most authentically to determine efficiency of these or those management
decisions.
Efficiency
of activities of the entity which provides competitiveness of oil and gas
companies in many respects depends on its adaptation to conditions of
constantly changing external environment and a capability to fixed enhancement
and development. Therefore value maximization of the company for the benefit of
the owner shall become a main objective of enhancement and development. It is
possible to provide achievement of this purpose through creation of the
effective controling mechanism by the company sensitive to fixed changes in an
industry and in the market in general. The most efficient of such mechanisms is
the management concept efficiency of the company on the basis of a cost index.
Management
of the cost of the company allows to redistribute cash flows most effectively.
The methodology allowing to compare various investment alternatives and to make
the most rational decisions which will allow to increase cost is necessary for
the solution of questions of management of cost.
The
reliable assessment requires the correct application of the existing
approaches. In economic literature allocate three main approaches to an
assessment of the company which in a different measure correspond to this or
that cost determination of the company: comparative, costly and profitable.
Comparative
approach. Comparison of object of an assessment with similar objects concerning
which there is price information of transactions with them. Benefits:
Objectivity. Correctly estimated company reflects the most probable cost of
business since similar business has been already estimated by the market and is
sold in the recent past at determined price. Shortcomings: Cost determination
is based on data on recently made transactions of purchase and sale by similar
objects therefore in Russia in the conditions of the opaque market this method
to apply extremely difficult. Lack of financial and market information,
unreliability of the received data, need of introduction of adjustments,
backwardness of the stock market.
Cost
approach. Cost determination which are required for recovery or replacement of
object of an assessment, taking into account its depreciation. Research of
business using methods of a cost approach is performed proceeding from the size
of those assets and liabilities which were purchased by the company for the
period of the functioning on the basis of the principle of replacement.
Benefits: Precisely determines a project cost, without application of
assumptions and forecasting.
Calculations
rely on financial and accounting records. Considers influence of production and
economic factors on a change in value of assets. Shortcomings: Has a narrow
focus. It is applied in the conditions of absence or backwardness of the
market, and also determination of salvage value. Is not suitable for an assessment
of profitable companies as the methodology of approach does not reflect the
cash flows generated by the company. Any profitable company estimated by this
approach will be significantly underestimated in cost. Impossibility of
accounting of future benefits, problems of an assessment of intangible assets,
depreciation.
Income
approach. Determination of time and the sizes of the income which will be
gained by the owner and to what risk it is integrated. Creation of the forecast
of the income and expenses and their reduction to current value. Benefits:
Profitability of the entity is considered that reflects a main objective of its
functioning – income acquisition by the owner. Considers prospects of
development of the entity. It is possible to constitute the authentic forecast
of the income and expenses, to reasonably estimate expectations of the investor
on a required return rate, proceeding from risk level of capital investments at
object. Shortcomings: We will apply to an assessment of the companies bringing
rather big positive size of the income. Because of an unstable economic
situation in Russia inaccuracy of the forecast of a long-term flow of the
income increases.
We
will consider the main methods of traditional approaches to a value assessment
of the company and we will reveal the most applicable for a value assessment of
oil and gas company.
It
is known that comparative approach is based on the principle of replacement:
the buyer will not purchase a real estate object if its cost exceeds purchase
costs in the market of the similar object possessing the same usefulness.
Within comparative approach allocate three evaluation methods of the company:
1.
Method of the companies analogs. It is applied when the amount of the estimated
participation in the authorized capital is not control. Is based on use of the
prices which are created by the public stock market.
2.
Method of transactions. As it is based on use of the price of acquisition of
the company analog in general or its controlling stock, those transactions with
share blocks of the company analog which are characterized as transactions of
merge and absorption are considered.
3.
Method of industry coefficients. It is based on use of recommended ratios
between the price of the company and certain financial parameters. Industry
coefficients are calculated on the basis of long statistical supervision by
special research institutes behind a selling price of various operating
companies and their major production and financial characteristics.
The
technique of an assessment of market value of the company in case of a cost
approach is based on the assumption that the owner of property in case of
implementation of object of property in the free market shall compensate
completely own costs connected with creation or acquisition of the company and
its input in action taking into account a factor of time and change of economic
conditions. In case of cost determination of the company a cost approach apply
the following evaluation methods:
1.
Method of accumulating of assets or method of calculation of book value of
assets. Determines the cost of the company as the cost of its property by the
amount of net assets of the financial reporting.
2.
Method of calculation of all-in replacement cost and replacement cost. Determines
costs for reproduction of the exact copy of object.
3.
Method of calculation of salvage value. Is based on summing of current values
of cash flows from implementation of the estimated assets.
4.
Method of calculation of net assets. Assets and liabilities which participate
in calculation are determined. Net assets are calculated as a difference
between assets and liabilities.
The
income approach assumes establishment of cost of the company or its part by
calculation of current value of expected profit. I.e. the income and profit of
the company is considered as a fundamental factor which will determine the size
of cost of the company. The profitable method is reasonable in case of a
possibility of forecasting of future income.
The
income approach is based on statement that the reasonable buyer will not pay
for object more amount which the estimated object will bring in the future in
the form of the net income corrected on investment risk. The methods of an
income approach which are the most extended for the Russian companies are:
1.
Income capitalization method. Is based on statement that ownership ratio cost
is equal in the company to current value of future income which will be brought
in by this property. In case of this method the estimated cost of the operating
company is considered equal to the relation of a net profit to the chosen
capitalization rate. Often use for a rough and preliminary express assessment
oil and gas (the long-term companies).
2.
A method of the discounted cash flows. Is based that the cost of the company
depends on future benefits. This method performs an assessment of prospects of
the company and assumes an assessment, first of all, not of property of the
estimated object, but the income which this property can bring. Thus, the
expectations connected with future value creation – play a special role in
forming of cost of the company.
We
will consider applicability of above-mentioned methods for a value assessment
of oil and gas companies and degree of their accuracy for use for the purpose
of management.
Within
a cost approach any of four methods does not reflect all-in cost. Application
of a liquidation value approach for an assessment of oil and gas companies is
not actual for the large oil and gas enterprises since they are not on the
verge of bankruptcy or liquidation. A big shortcoming is that all features of
oil and gas companies are not reflected in balance, such as amounts of explored
reserves, costs for development and search of new fields, therefore, in case of
application of a method of accumulating of assets, as well as a method of net
assets not all-in cost of oil and gas companies will be received. The method of
replacement cost is applied generally to cost determination of real estate, its
application for calculation of cost of oil and gas companies is very
complicated by information search for the similar company.
The
cost of the company determined by means of one of methods of comparative
approach also will not be exact. So, when using a method of the companies
analogs or a method of transactions difficulty consists in search and selection
of the comparable companies. In case of all similarity of technologically
interconnected productions, nevertheless it is impossible to call the oil
companies similar. Their difference can be shown both in production amounts,
and in sale scales. All this affects indicators of activities of the companies.
For example, the Russian oil companies seeming at first sight similar have
various indicators of amounts of production and sale and as a result various
stock quotation and capitalization. In the Russian practice of an assessment of
oil and gas companies the method of industry coefficients is not applicable due
to the lack of necessary information which collection and generalization
requires the long period of time and a certain economic stability.
The
capitalization method of the income of an income approach gives not exact value
of cost, however it it is possible to be used in case of an express assessment
of the company. When calculating of the discounted cash flows the positive
moment is an opportunity to reflect the expenses connected with exploration and
with development of fields in costs. At the same time amounts of explored
reserves of oil and gas, amounts of oil and gas extraction, production
capacities, a sales network of gas station are considered as receipt according
to the income. But in the conditions of an uncertain economic situation and uncertainty
the calculated cost of oil and gas company will appear absolutely not the
corresponding reality.
Most
of foreign and domestic authors pay the main attention to theoretical reasons
and use of traditional methods and models of an assessment for the purpose of
increase of company performance. However, as we see from the stated above
analysis, each method has the shortcomings for an assessment of the oil and gas
entity. Therefore it should be taken into account modern methods which in view
of the universality and an intermediate position have a number of advantages
before traditional over three approaches to an assessment.
Black–Scholes
Option Pricing Model determines the cost of the company as the cost of the call
option, the company consisting of assets and liabilities. In case of this
method for calculation of cost use a formula (1):
Ñ=A×N(d1)-O×N(d2)×e(rfr) (1)
This
method has the following shortcomings: complexity of practical application for
the companies which are not open joint stock companies (for the majority of
subsidiaries of oil and gas holdings); the high extent of influence of a market
component complicating a measure definition of efficiency of the current
activities.
Edwards-Bell-Ohlson
valuation model uses statement about existence of the "abnormal"
income determined by a difference between the return which is really received
by the investor on the invested capital and the expected return. The cost is in
that case determined by a formula (2).
Ñ=Ñ(bal)+Ä(à)×à1+v×à2 (2)
However
this model has the following shortcomings: an important condition of
applicability of this model is need of availability of stability in the stock
market within, at least, 10 years; a tsutstviye for the Russian companies of
the sufficient statistical information necessary for calculation of the offered
coefficients a1 and a2.
The
method based on an indicator of joint-stock value added (SVA). The cost of the
company by means of this method is determined as the amount of market value of
the invested capital at the beginning of the period, the cumulative size of the
added shareholder value of a forecast period and market value of securities and
other investments. Complexity of application of this method for oil and gas
companies is need for its calculation of determination of the period of
competitive advantages.
The
method based on an indicator of economic value added (EVA) which cornerstone
the concept not of accounting, but economic profit is. In this case the
indicator of economic value added is determined as a difference between net
operating profit after the taxation and the size of the used equity corrected
on its weighted average cost. The main strategic objective of management is the
business value addition. Therefore the task of effective management of EVA is
reduced providing stable non-negative values of this indicator. Its positive
dynamics means that business of the company develops more effectively, than the
market in general. Therefore, with a growth of EVA investment appeal of this
company increases. To the contrary, if steady dynamics to decrease in an
indicator of EVA is observed, then it is possible to speak about reduction of
cost of firm and fall of interest of external investors in it. Oil and gas
companies often require an efficiency evaluation of activities not only in
general, but also separate divisions to determine at what production phase (or
in what department) inefficient investment decisions are made that allows to carry
out this method. The size EVA has close interrelation with share value of the
company that is important for the entities of an oil and gas complex.
Thus,
in case of implementation of cost approach to company management by the most
acceptable the income approach since it fully considers features of oil and gas
companies is and as a result gives more exact assessment to their cost. However
traditional methods of this approach not in complete degree considers features
of oil and gas companies. As a result of the conducted researches it has been
revealed that the evaluation method based on an indicator of economic value
added in view of the benefits is the most suitable for management of the cost
of the companies of an oil and gas complex. This method allows to determine
quickly deviations of cost of the company in response to change not only
external (market), but also internal indicators.
References:
1.
Èâàí÷åíêî Ä.Í. Ôàêòîðû
ñòîèìîñòè êîìïàíèè // Ïðîáëåìû ýêîíîìèêè è óïðàâëåíèÿ íåôòåãàçîâûì êîìïëåêñîì:
Íàó÷íî-ýêîíîìè÷åñêèéæóðíàë ÎÀÎ «ÂÍÈÈÎÝÍû - èþíü 2010 - Ñ. 44-47.
2.
Ñîêîëîâ Â.Í. Ìåòîäû
îöåíêè ïðåäïðèÿòèÿ / Ñ.-Ïåòåðáóðã.ãîñ.èíæ. ýêîí. àêàä. – ÑÏá., 2011. – 144ñ.
3. Hamaghi D., Zahedi
J., Mortazavi R. The evaluation of information content of performance measures
in Iran’s capital market // Interdisciplinary journal of contemporary research
in business. – 2012. - ¹4.
4. Parvaei A., Farhadi
S. The ability of explaining and predicting of Economic Value Added versus Net
Income, Residual Income & Free Cash Flow in Tehran Stock Exchange //
International journal of economics and finance. – 2013. - ¹2.
5. Pinto T.,
Machado-Santos C. An analysis of correlation between EVA and MVA: the case of a
NYSE Euronext Lisbon listed company // Global journal of international business
research. – 2011. - ¹4.