Jaroslav Balvín

 

Social and pedagogical psychology in relation to the Roma

 

Institute of Roma Cultural Studies

Constantine the Philosopher University

Department of Social Sciences and Health

 

Abstract

As for Europe the highest concentration of Roma (per inhabitant) is in the Slovak republic. The total number of Romanies is estimated to be around 500 000. The communication between the Romany minority and the Slovak majority brings along many stressful situations, the solving of which demands on the part of the society also a psychological preparation of specialists working with the Romanies. We want to show on the example of the Institute of Roma Cultural Studies at the Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra how our specialists carry out this preparation also on the field of social and pedagogical psychology.

 

 

Keywords

Social psychology, pedagogical psychology, psychology of Romany thinking, philosophy of Romany thinking, intercultural psychology.

 

 

 

Meaning of social a pedagogical psychology for social workers engaged in Romany communities.

 

The Division of Romany Culture was founded at the Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra (Slovak republic) in 1991. This division was transformed in 2006 into the Institute of Roma Cultural Studies. During their existence the division’s and today the institute’s focus lies on preparation of pedagogical workers, who are supposed teach Romany children; the education and research at the Department of Social Sciences and Health has been focusing on social work in Roma communities since 2000.

Apart from social subjects the students and future social workers are acquainted also with general and special pedagogy. And for their education neighbouring disciplines as social and pedagogical psychology are being applied as well. The psychology is adapted to the situation of Roma in a subject called Psychology of Romany Thinking held by the specialist on psychology Miroslava Čerešníková. She focuses in her published works (cf. e.g. Čerešníková, 2006, p. 118-129) as well as in her pedagogical occupation on psychological aspects of situations in which the Roma find themselves as a result of their historical handicap. These situations occur in Romany families, in schools, in relations between the majority and the minority and are often conflicting and have to by solved also with help of the social worker and teacher. In such situations knowledge of psychology is essential; that’s why the subject Psychology of Romany Thinking is so important for our students.

Equally important is also the teaching of the subject Philosophy of Romany Thinking. An expert on Romany issues Lýdia Lehoczká has been focused on matters concerning the identity of the Roma in the long term. Compared the Psychology of Romany Thinking the basis is the long-termed embedding of psychology in philosophy. Psychology has been from Antiquity and the Middle Ages on traditionally understood as the “science of the spirit” and was a natural part of philosophy. The separation of psychology and its schematic constitution were founded in the 19-th century when psychology began to be connected with the means of natural sciences, when empiric methods and the experiment began to be applied. This separation from philosophy is called in psychology the “empiric turn” (cf. Kern et al., 1999: 269). The spirit is of great significance in the psychological and philosophical depth of Romany thinking. It is no accident that young Czech Romany journalists labelled one of the newest magazines with high journalistic quality “Romano voďi” – the Romany spirit (cf. www.romea.cz). This magazine is aimed particularly at presentation of Romany personalities, younger or more experienced ones. The point of this can be explained by the Latin proverb EXEMPLA TRAHUNT – examples draw people. The introduction of positive examples of Romany personalities is also a way to influence the psychology of other Roma who’s sense of  identity is not that much developed. Is sense is described in scientific literature as “a permanent inner state of balance with oneself, the continuity of self-experience and self-         -feeling of the individual which is often established in an important way by acceptance of certain social roles and affiliations to social groups as well as by social recognition of these roles in these groups” (Ondrejkovič, 1998, p. 357).

As Lehoczká writes, “the interpretation of identity in a social psychological sense by the above mentioned quotation allows us and motivates us at the same time to compare the reality of the present-day life of the Roma ethnic group. The situation is hard to compare to a permanent inner state of balance with oneself respectively with a continuity of self-feeling and fulfilling of social roles … We suppose that the less significant are based on these reasons as well” (Lehoczká, 2006, p. 55).

 

Importance of social and pedagogical psychology for teachers of Roma pupils

 

Education and teaching of Romany pupils is integrated into a whole system of natural and social factors, which influence and determine this process (cf. Balvín, 2004).

Psychology is important for teachers of Romany pupils mainly because it focuses on studying of psychological events and experiencing of certain situations in educational surrounding. They are influenced by the ethnic, cultural and social background of the Romany pupil and the Roma family which affects in a substantial way the behaviour and solving of stressful situations (for instance the entry of the Romany pupil into the first grade). It is therefore important for practical teaching, for practical solving of pedagogic situations which psychological situations are a part of. As Rastislav Rosinský who concentrates mainly on the question of the motivation of Romany pupils says the biggest problem affecting the soul of Romany child like “acid rain” is, that “the Romany children oscillate between two diametrically different worlds and their view of the real life. This is now the point on which the schizophrenia of the Roma matter emerges… Even seeds of efforts planted into their soul run dry with each returning home into an environment having an impact on them like acid rain” (Rosinský, 2006, p. 98).

 

The pedagogical psychology is a scientific discipline acting as intermediary between psychology and pedagogy. The teacher of Romany pupils can find within its framework many advises on how to communicate and on how the interaction between the teacher and Romany pupil and other persons participating on this interaction (Romany family – pupil – teacher, Roma community – teacher – school, majority – teacher – Roma minority and so on) is supposed to look like. Denisa Selická is concerned with questions of pedagogical psychology too. She points out that the social pedagogue plays an advisory role as for children in seemingly stressful situations: e.g. helping children to integrate into a collective, helping them with emotional, moral and social disorders and so on (Selická, 2006, p. 87).

Also an individual view on pedagogical problems is a requirement for pedagogy and education so that the pedagogical psychology could have a more intense impact on pedagogical sciences, on the practice of education, teaching and schooling everywhere where these are implemented (Ďurič, Bratská and others, 1997: 221). And education of Romany pupils and its specific situation mostly within Romany communities in which the school works is one of these important points.

For teachers of Romany pupils it is without a doubt necessary to acquaint with pedagogical psychology as a whole. But within their disciplines is necessary to point out particularities related to the Romany culture, the social environment and nonetheless with psychological problems related to the situation of the Romany ethnic minority as a whole and as for each of it’s manifestations in which psychological situations created in the process of education of Romany pupils are very important.

 

Mastering the sense of life: a view of the Roma from within

 

“Ko tuke šaj phenel, soske te dživel? Ňiko, mro čho! U korkore pestar te phučel na kampel. Dživ u buter na kampel. Oda sa. Phir, dikh pašal peste u pharipen tut ňigda na skikidela…”

“Who is going to help you, what are you living for? Nobody will tell you, brother. It’s useless to ask yourself. Just live and that’s it. Babble this and that, look around and sadness never gets you…”

 

Maxim Gorkij: Makar Čudra, Tatran Bratislava 1973, 1. edition, excerpt (taken from: Horváthová, 2006, p. 28 and 31 – Slovak and Romany text)

 

In the probably best-known and most catchy writing about Roma from Maxim Gorkij on which the movie and many theatrical adaptations under the title Gypsies go to heaven are based reflects a Roma about the sense of his life and the sense of the lives of people surrounding him. This reflection starts with the refusal of the sense of existence of people bounded to the soil that has to by permanently and strenuously cultivated and looked after for a whole lifetime, of people not knowing anything else than one place they are working on until they fall from exhaustion and in which they stay for their whole lives. He says: my sense of life has different foundations:

·        I know for sure and I accept it that nobody is going to tell me what the sense of life is.

·        To ask myself about the sense of life is really useless.

·        As a consequence of these facts there is no other possibility than to LIVE.

·        Living means to me wandering here and there.

·        Living means to me attentively looking around, discovering new and foreign lands.

·        And that is the best way not to fall into depression.

Upon a nearer examination of this attitude towards fulfilling of the sense of life we could find parallels with existentialism, relativism of life hedonism and the like. This point of view is however rather romantic and does not consider the harshness of the nomadic way of life and the necessity to make a living also by means defeated and persecuted by the majority population. This is not the place to cover this ideology in details, although the comparison of the Roma philosophy of thinking and the anthropocentric way of thinking would be very interesting. Concerning education and schooling I will rather focus on the question if it is possible to draw upon such a view of the sense of life as one of the most important ethic categories, as it was presented in Makar Čudra. I suppose that the priority TO LIVE was deduced from the following facts:

·        necessity not to think about broader associations,

·        isolation of the Roma community last for a long time in the past,

·        indeed, the priority was to live but often this was rather surviving,

·        the European historic social events, way of thinking and culture did not affect the spiritual life of the Roma itself,

·        the surrounding world saw on the Roma mainly their outer traits: like they looked like, like they maintained, but people were usually not concerned with them and their spiritual life,

·        as a result of isolation from the mainly hostile surrounding moral norms helping to defend against the majority society as well as the binormative Romany ethics strengthened,

·        as a result of a specific living even a atmosphere of animosity, hate, revenge against the majority society evolved.

 

Katarína Vanková writes: “it was not until the last decades when Roma began to identify their destiny with the destiny of the rest of the population and to understanding identity in a part of the Romany population. First time in history it came and comes to equalization, granting of rights, free development and acknowledgment of nationality. For the first time a situation was created when the relations between the Roma and the majority society don’t have to be a priori those of distrust and inequality” (Vanková, 2006, p. 44). Even though the social change in the past decades was without a doubt of great importance and represented a radical turn I am a supporter rather of the evolution of changes in relations between the Romanies and the not-Romanies. The problem of ethic rules depends on historic circumstances, it has its evolution which imitates in its own way the economical and political development. Ethic norms also have their evolutionary and contradictory dialectics, their particular historical embedding similar to the development of the society. Thus the differences in the level of sedentarization of the Romany communities surely influenced the idea of the sense of life. The Romanies have been living in certain Slovak territories for longer than 500 years now and in a certain symbiosis with the Gajos in villages. The Romanies were settled in the Czech republic and Moravia too, but became victims of genocide and holocaust and were almost totally exterminated. Another situation is in the western European countries where Romanies still have a nomadic way of life.

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

 

  • Balvín, Jaroslav. 2004. Výchova a vzdělávání romských žáků jako pedagogický systém. Praha: Radix, Hnutí R
  • Čerešníková, Miroslava. 2006. Spolupráca rómské rodiny a školy. In: Rosinský, Rastislav (editor): Prierez socio-kultúrnymi vrstvami identity Rómov (vysokoškolský učebný text). Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre Fakulta sociálnych vied a zdravotníctva, s. 118-129. ISBN 80-8050-981-6.
  • Kolominskij, J. L. 1982. Tajemství psychologie. Praha: Mladá fronta.
  • Lehoczká, Lýdie. 2006. Národná identita Rómov v kontexte ekonomicko-sociálnych a etno/kulturologických aspektov. In: Rosinský, Rastislav (editor): Prierez socio-kultúrnymi vrstvami identity Rómov (vysokoškolský učebný text). Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre Fakulta sociálnych vied a zdravotníctva, s. 52-74. ISBN 80-8050-981-6.
  • Ondrejkovič, Peter. 1998. Úvod do sociologie výchovy. Bratislava:Veda.
  • Rosinský, Rastislav. 2006. Pohľad na edukáciu rómskych detí. In: Rosinský, Rastislav (editor): Prierez socio-kultúrnymi vrstvami identity Rómov (vysokoškolský učebný text). Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre Fakulta sociálnych vied a zdravotníctva, s. 91-117. ISBN 80-8050-981-6.
  • Selická, Denisa. 2006. Práca socuálneho pedagóga a terénního sociálního pracovníka v rómskych osadách. In: Rosinský, Rastislav (editor): Prierez socio-kultúrnymi vrstvami identity Rómov (vysokoškolský učebný text). Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre Fakulta sociálnych vied a zdravotníctva, s.75-90. ISBN 80-8050-981-6.
  • Vanková, Katarína. 2006. Identifikačné špecifika Rómov. In: Rosinský, Rastislav (editor): Prierez socio-kultúrnymi vrstvami identity Rómov (vysokoškolský učebný text). Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa v Nitre Fakulta sociálnych vied a zdravotníctva, s.18-51. ISBN 80-8050-981-6.
  • Kern, Hans., Mehl, Christine., Nolz, Hellfried., Peter, Martin., Wintersperger, Regina. 1999. Přehled psychologie. Praha: Portál. Původní německé vydání: Projekt Psychologie. ISBN 80-7178-240-8.

 

 

 

Contact

Doc. PhDr. Mgr. Jaroslav Balvín, CSc.

Director

Institute of Roma Cultural Studies

Constantine the Philosopher University

Department of Social Sciences and Health

Kraskova 1

Nitra