S.A.
Syurin, MD, DrMedSci.,
Kola Research Laboratory for
Occupational Health (Kirovsk, Russia)
ON THE PREVALENCE OF CHRONIC
RESPIRATORY DISEASES IN THE POPULATION OF MURMANSK REGION
Introduction. Chronic
bronchopulmonary diseases (CBPD)
are rated among global priority health
and social problems due to their
increasing prevalence and magnitude
of economic losses [1]. According to
many epidemiological studies chronic
bronchitis (CB) and
chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD) are detected in 1-10%,
and asthma - in 1-18% of the total
adult population [1, 3, 4, 6]. Despite their high prevalence, it is a universally recognized fact
that CBPD are not timely and completely diagnosed, particularly COPD. Thus, according to the Ministry of Health of Russia in 2003, there were approximately 1 million patients with COPD, whereas according to the epidemiological studies
their number was expected to be over 11
million [2]. Improvement of the quality
of diagnostic work in Russia led to an
increase in the number of patients with CB, COPD and
emphysema to 2.4 million,
and asthma - to 1.4 million people in 2007 [4, 6]
The aim of the study was a
comparative investigation of the CBPD prevalence rates obtained according to the attendance rates at
the health care facilities of the
Murmansk region, and in the
surveys of industrial workers
during periodic medical examinations.
Materials and methods. In
2008-2010, 8125 industrial workers underwent
annual medical examinations targeted at the determination of respiratory diseases prevalence
in the adult working population. The surveyed persons were employees of the largest industrial companies in the mining and metallurgical
complex of the Kola North located
in five administrative districts of
Murmansk region. Working conditions at all enterprises created
an increased risk of CBPD due to air pollution and adverse parameters of workplace microclimate.
Of the total number of 2313 surveyed employees of the Kola
Mining and Metallurgical Company (Kola
MMC) 841 persons were
engaged in underground mining of copper-nickel
ore at the "Severny"
mine in the town of Zapolyarny, Pechenga district. The larger part of Kola MMC workforce were
employed in electrolytic
production of nickel (1028 persons), carbonyl
production of nickel (188 persons), pyrometallurgical
and electrolytic production of copper (595
persons) and in the auxiliary shops of the
company (502 persons) at the "Severonikel"
plant in the town of Monchegorsk. Of the 4492 surveyed employees of JSC "Apatite" 3021 workers carried out
mining of apatite ore in 2 surface and 2
underground mines. Another 801 and 790 persons were
engaged in transportation and enrichment of apatite ore, respectively. All
production facilities of JSC "Apatite" are located in the
towns of Kirovsk and Apatity. Among the examined workers
there were also 479 employees of the Kandalakshsky aluminum plant (the town of Kandalaksha) who were engaged in
electrolytic production of aluminum (309 persons) and in service
shops (170 persons).
Data on the CBPD prevalence in Murmansk
region in 2009 were obtained from the
Statistical Book "Morbidity of Murmansk region population. 2005-2009".
The results. Analysis
of the total CBPD prevalence rates showed substantial variation of indicators
in the territorial-administrative units of
the Murmansk region and the lack
of correlation between the prevalence rates of
CB, COPD and asthma. Thus, at the same
time Pechenga district experienced the highest CB prevalence rate and
the lowest COPD prevalence rate although these two diseases have similar
etiology and pathogenesis. The minimum asthma prevalence was found in Kandalaksha, and the maximum - in Monchegorsk. The
maximum and minimum territorial prevalence rates
of CB differed 4.15 times, COPD - 2.70
times, asthma - 2.90
times. The prevalence of respiratory
diseases was not associated with
the current territorial industry. With the same type of mining
and chemical manufacturing in the
Kirovsk-Apatity area, CB prevalence in Kirovsk was 1.79 times higher, and asthma
- 1.29 times lower
than in Apatity.
For the integrated assessment of CBPD
prevalence we have ranked the five studied areas.
The highest prevalence for each nosological form was
estimated as five points, and the lowest - as one point. In accordance with aggregate
number of points, the most favorable epidemiological situation on CBPD was detected in Kandalaksha
(6 points). The ranking of other
administrative districts was as follows: Pechenga (8 points), Apatity (9 points),
Monchegorsk (10 points) and Kirovsk
(12 points). In general,
regional indicators in Murmansk
region, in comparison with the
federal level, significantly differed
only in CB prevalence, which was two times lower than in the country (Table 1).
Table 1
Totall CBPD prevalence in administrative
districts of Murmansk
region, in Murmansk region in
general and in Russian Federation
in 2009 (%)
|
Administrative unit |
CB |
COPD |
Asthma |
|
Town of Apatity |
0,39 |
0,80 |
1,19 |
|
Town of Kandalaksha |
0,64 |
0,43 |
0,60 |
|
Town of Kirovsk |
0,70 |
0,89 |
0,92 |
|
Town of Monchegorsk |
0,60 |
0,68 |
1,74 |
|
Pechenga district |
1,62 |
0,33 |
0,71 |
|
Murmansk region |
0,72 |
0,50 |
0,98 |
|
Russian Federation |
1,47 |
0,61 |
0,82 |
The CB and COPD prevalence rates did not differ
significantly in various groups of surveyed industrial workers. At the same time the
prevalence of asthma ranged substantially from 2.71% (Kandalakshsky aluminum plant) to 0.61% (“Severny” mine of Kola MMC). A similar cumulative scoring
of morbidity rates showed the most favorable epidemiological
situation among employees of JSC "Apatite"
(4 points). Next position, in
keeping with the degree of
deterioration, was taken by “Severny” mine
of Kola MMC (6 points).
The plant "Severonikel" of Kola
MMC and Kandalakshsky aluminum plant (10 points)
showed the worst results (Table 2).
Comparison of CBPD morbidity rates (calculated from the number
of persons who sought medical assistance in the local health care facilities)
of the adult population in the five studied territorial administrative units and CBPD
prevalence rates in employees of mining and metallurgical enterprises (active
detection health disorders during medical examinations) revealed sharp differences
on the two nosological forms: CB and COPD. The CB and COPD
prevalence rates in workers of
industrial enterprises were 14.7
and 3.98 times higher
(respectively) than the official figures. Prevalence of asthma in
the two compared groups of
population was not significantly different.
Table 2
Totall CBPD prevalence in
industrial workers in 2008-2009 (%)
|
Enterprise |
CB |
COPD |
Asthma |
|
JSC "Apatite" |
9,85 |
1,95 |
0,81 |
|
"Severonikel" plant Kola MMC |
11,35 |
2,56 |
1,42 |
|
"Severny" mine Kola MMC |
10,18
|
2,21 |
0,61 |
|
Kandalakshsky aluminum
plant |
14,61 |
2,09 |
2,71 |
|
The average for the four enterprises |
10,59 |
1,99 |
1,06 |
Discussion. An
analysis of official statistics showed
chaotic distribution of the CBPD
prevalence rates in the adult population
in five administrative-territorial formations of
Murmansk region. It also showed
no signs of local influence of non-ferrous metallurgy enterprises
on respiratory health of the population within their locations. This is contrary to the results of previous studies that have proven that working conditions and environmental
changes due to production of nickel and aluminum substantially increase
the risk of COPD, CB [2] and asthma [5].
It is important that medical examinations of employees of mining and
metallurgical companies reveal a significantly higher CB and COPD prevalence
rates compared with the adult population
of the region as a whole. This fact, which at first glance seems obvious, requires explanation. The most obvious argument is that
characteristic for the mining and
metallurgical industry hazards of
work and labor process substantially
increase the risk of respiratory
pathology. For
example, the prevalence of COPD in smoking metallurgical workers with long experience can reach 35.1% [2]. However,
it is known that the
CBPD prevalence in employees of enterprises with hazardous working conditions is also
influenced by factors with
opposite effect. There are at least two such factors. First, a pre-employment medical examination, which places a barrier for access to
professions with hazardous working conditions for those with chronic respiratory
diseases. This
creates the effect of a «healthier
worker», than the population of the area
as a whole. The second factor is the well-known phenomenon of concealment of disease symptoms during medical
examinations («underreporting») due to socio-economic
reasons. It arises because of the fear
to lose or to have only limited access
to higher paying jobs with
harmful working conditions.
Taking into account the
above, it appears that a more likely
reason for the differences found in
the CBPD prevalence rates is a way
of getting information. Official statistics use the data from health care institutions,
mainly derived from the information
about requests for medical attention. Of course, these statistics can not be complete. Official data are often an order of magnitude lower than in epidemiological studies because it does not
include information about the initial stages of diseases which do not require treatment-seeking and issuing of temporary disability
certificates. In
contrast, a complex clinical and functional
examination during periodical medical
examinations helps detect early
stages of respiratory disorders. Also, this occurs in those cases
when for some reasons (including the above mentioned
social reasons), the employee hides
truthful information about his (her)
health status. Medical and social importance
of early stages of CBPD consists in poor predictability of their potential transfer
(without proper prevention measures)
into diseases with severe clinical
manifestations and poor prognosis of medical interventions [3, 6].
There should be an explanation for the lack of
significant differences in the asthma prevalence according to official statistics
and medical examinations of industrial workers. Probably
in health care settings cases of asthma are recorded better than that of CB and
COPD. On the other hand, three factors may reduce asthma prevalence in employees exposed to hazardous working conditions. First, it is detection of asthma cases at the
stage of pre-employment medical
examination, which is a contraindication to
beginning professional carrier in a wide range of occupations linked to
workplace hazards. Secondly, it is deliberate
hiding of mild asthma cases by
employees («underreporting»). These
cases can not be identified with
the help of diagnostic facilities available in the standard and targeted
medical examination. Third, it is the
known phenomenon of resignations of workers with symptoms of workplace asthma
(both diagnosed and undiagnosed asthma patients) which remain unregistered
according to official health statistics. The impact of
these three factors may result in a falsely
reduced asthma prevalence rate in industrial workers.
Conclusion. From practical and scientific points of view, there is a need to clarify CBPD prevalence in the population of Murmansk region. Such information can be obtained through a
targeted clinical and functional
examination of a representative group of adult population,
including industrial employees with hazardous workplace
conditions.
References
1. Buist
A.S., McBurnie M.N., Vollmer W.M., et
al. International variation in the prevalence of COPD (The BOLD study): a population-based
study. Lancet. 2007; 370: 741-750.
2. Chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease: a practical guide for physicians / ed. A.G. Chuchalin. -
M., 2004 [in Russian]..
3. Guidelines
for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of
asthma / ed. A.G. Chuchalin. –
M., 2005 [in Russian]..
4. Leshchenko I.V. Key
questions of early treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Consilium Medicum. 2008; 10: 46-50 [in Russian]..
5. Vasilieva
O.S. Occupational asthma: clinical variants and diagnosis. Pulmonologiay. 2005; 5: 61-68 [in Russian].
6. Yemelianov A.V., Sergeeva G.R. Asthma: How to
improve long-term outcomes? Consilium Medicum. 2010; 12: 80-84 [in Russian].