L.T. Kurmangaziyeva -PhD.
Atyrau Institute of Oil and Gas
APPROACH TO
FORMALIZATION OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROBLEM ON THE BASIS OF KNOWLEDGE
Abstract:
Decision-making problems to select optimal modes of
operation of refining technological facilities on the example of the Catalytic
Reforming Unit ËÃ are formalized in this paper, new
formulation of such problems have been obtained.
Novelty of received multicriteria decision-making problems is
that they are formulated and solved in a fuzzy environment, without converting
them to deterministic problems, i.e. keeping and using available information of
a qualitative nature. Proposed approach is based on knowledge and experience of
specialists and experts can get adequate solutions of complex industrial
problems.
Quality and results of work of industrial facilities are
estimated by some indicators - local criteria of economic, environmental,
technological and other character. For optimal management of such facilities it
is required to pay these criteria in extreme (high or low). Such problems are formalized
in a form of multicriteria decision-making problems, which are decided on the
basis of mathematical models of the facility managed.
Because of the
large number and variety of parameters that govern the processes of catalytic
reforming due to internal relations between parameters of the technological
complex, mathematically non-formalized actions of a human operator, these
objects and their optimization are complex. In addition, when decision-making
problems on management of such facilities there are some range of problems
associated with many contradictory and unclear described criteria that
determine the quality of the object. In these cases during decision-making
problems by main sources of information will be the human being (experts,
process engineer, unit operator) that is their knowledge, experience, intuition
and judgment, which are expressed by qualitative information, i.e. verbally.
Let’s consider the approach to formalization
and formulation of decision-making problems in the term of discussed multicriteriality
and uncertainty caused by the fuzziness of information available. We concretize
the formalization and formulation problems of optimization using mathematical
models on the example of the decision-making process to manage the process unit
of the catalytic reforming, as described in the previous section.
Let f(x)
= f1(x),…,fm(x) is criteria vector that evaluates quality
of work, for example, economic efficiency and environmental safety of process
complex of the reforming unit. For example: f1(x), f2(x), f3(x) - respectively, yield of the desired
product - volume of catalysate, dry gas and HCG (hydrogen containing gas); f4(x), f5(x),…,f14(x) - qualitative indicators of output
products (eg. for catalysate - gasoline: octane number, a fractional
composition according to GOST - 10% and 50% distillation; saturated vapor
pressure; content of the actual resin, content of water-soluble acids and alkalis,
for dry gas: content of hydrogen, methane, ethane, propane, isobutane and
n-butane; for HCG: hydrogen% vol.; specific gravity), f15(x), f16(x),…, f23(x) - local criteria to evaluate
environment safety, e.g. solid, liquid and gaseous wastes and emissions (spent
catalysts, waste waters, air emissions - hydrocarbon gases, hydrogen sulfide,
sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon black), as well as environment
damage caused by pollution and waste processing [1].
Each of
m criteria depends on vector of n parameter (control actions, operating
parameters) x = (x1,…,xn), such as temperature and pressure of reactors,
ovens, etc., content of raw materials, specifications of the catalysts, etc.
This dependence is described by the model developed in the previous section. In practice, there are always various constraints (economic, technological,
environmental) that can be described by some of the features – restrictions jq³bq, q=
. It should be noted that some of the considered local
criteria and constraints are reduced to qualitative restrictions of kind no
more or no less than bq (jq
bq).
Regime, controlling also have their changes intervals made by the unit
regulations: xjÎW = [xjmin,
xjmax], xjmin, xjmax - lower and
upper limits of the parameter xj.
These limitations may be fuzzy (
).
It is required to select the optimal solution – mode
of working of the reforming unit, ensuring extreme value of the criteria vector
when execution of set constraints and fuzziness of some initial data, and takes
into account the preferences of decision-makers.
Formalized the problem in terms of multicriteria and
fuzziness can be written as the following decision-making problem:
max fi(x),
i=
(1)
xÎX
Õ = { xÎW, jq(x)
bq, q=
} (2)
Solution to this problem is a vector of operating
parameters x*=(x1*,…,xn*), providing
local criteria such values that satisfy the decision maker.
If part or all of the elements of problem given
(criteria, limitations, importance of criteria and constraints) are not
described quantitatively but qualitatively (fuzzy) then this problem is called decision-making
problem under uncertainty on the basis of quality information. In the known
methods for solving such problems, mainly considered one-criteria cases, there
is no flexibility with the view of preferences of decision-makers [2]. Thus, as
a rule, fuzzy task during setting is replaced by equivalent deterministic that
will result to loss of information.
In many cases, the qualitative factors (fuzzy statements,
judgments) are basic and familiar to the human being. Converting of fuzzy
description to a quantitative description is not always possible or impractical.
Therefore, in this paper we propose the most promising approach based to
develop methods of decision-making adapted to human language, to qualitative
factors of any nature, to the human decision-making procedures that are
formulated and solved in a fuzzy environment, without converting them to
deterministic problems, i.e., without losing of available information of fuzzy
character.
Thus, we reduce the problem (1) - (2) to the
multicriteria decision-making problem with qualitative nature of initial information.
Let m0(x) =
(m01(x),…,
(m0m(x))
- a normalized vector of criteria fi(x), i=
that evaluates criteria to control the catalytic reforming unit. Assume that for
each fuzzy restrictions jq(x)
bq, q=
function
of membership of its execution is constructed mq(x), q=
. Known
or several priorities for local criteria Ik = {1,…,m}
and limitations Ir = {1,…,L}, or a weight vector, which reflects the mutual
significance of criteria (g = (g1, …,gm)) and
restrictions b = (b1,…,bL)).
Then,
for example, on the basis of the ideas of methods of the main criterion and maximin,
multicriteria decision-making problem with vector restrictions with quality initial
information (1) - (2) can be written in the following formulation:
max m01(x), (3)
xÎX
X={x: xÎWLarg(m0i(x)³mri)Larg (max min (bqmq(x)), i=
,q=
} (4)
xÎW qÎL
where L - logical symbol
"and", requiring all their allegations be true, mri - limiting values
for local criteria m0i(õ), i=
set by decision-makers. Scope of definition of variable x
and implementation of fuzzy constraints is based on the principle of
maximin (guaranteed result).
Changing
mri and vector of
restrictions importance b=(b1,…,bL), we obtain a
family of solutions of (3) - (4) - x*(mr, b). Selection of best
solutions can be carried out on the basis of dialogue with decision-makers.
Using the
ideas of Pareto optimality and ideal point, modifying them in the event
of qualitative nature of the initial information, multicriteria decision-making
problem (1) - (2) can be rewritten as:
m0(õ), m0(õ) =
gi m0i(x), (5)
X={x: xÎW L arg(mq(x) ³ min ||m(x)–mu||D),
q=
}, (6)
where || × ||D - used metric D, m(x) =
(m1(x) ,…, mL(x)), mu = (max m1(x), …, max mL(x)). Option to use as the origin of an ideal point m u units: m u = (1, ..., 1); g = (g 1, ..., g m) - weight vector, reflecting the mutual
importance of local criteria.
Using the idea of the principles of absolute
(relative) concessions and Pareto
optimality in terms of fuzzyness, we can set following multicriteria
decision-making problem PR with a few restrictions:
m0(x), m0(x)=
gim0i(x)(m0(x)=
(m0i(x))gi èëè m0(x)=
gilogm0i(x)) (7)
X={x: xÎW L arg ![]()
bqmq(õ)L
bq=1Lbq³0, q=
} (8)
where L - logical symbol "and", requiring all
their allegations be true, g = (g1, …,gm) è b = (b1,…,bL) - respectively, weight
vectors reflecting the mutual importance of criteria and constraints.
Thus, various
decision-making problems to select optimal modes of operation of refining technological
complex on the example of the Catalytic Reforming Unit ËÃ under uncertainty are
formalized in this paper. On the basis of compromise schemes and methods of the
theory of tasks possibilities are put in the form of multicriteria decision-making
problems, which are novelty of this work. Specific problems of decision and selection
of optimal modes of technological units of the catalytic reforming unit have
been obtained based on these results. Dialogue algorithms to solve problems are
being developed by the author based on the modifications of ideas if various compromise
schemes of decision-making.
References:
1. Production
schedules catalytic reforming LG-35-11/300-95 (up to 2008).PC « Atyrau Oil Refinery»,
Atyrau:2002 -130p.
2. Orlovsky,
S.A. Decision making with fuzzy initial information -Ì.: 1981. -206 p.