V. Kasyanova

Kostanai State University named after A.Baitursynov, Kazakhstan

Selection of training material for teaching professionally-oriented foreign language at non-linguistic faculties

 

       According to the program of teaching professionally-oriented English for non-linguistic specialties a student after finishing the course of study must be able to read with a dictionary and understand the special literature on the profile, have the skills of oral and written speech in everyday and business communication, in monologue utterance, and possess skills for business correspondence. Therefore, the selection of lexical material is very actual and significant for achieving the goals of learning. According to many researchers the problem of selection of training material is not fully studied [3]. V.A. Slastenin considers that the content of education should include the following components: vocational and cognitive training, professional and practical training, professional development, professional education, general education and personal development. [3]

       Without mastering professional vocabulary (vocabulary minimum on profession) it is impossible to understand speech of others or express own thoughts. Therefore, during teaching professionally-oriented foreign language special attention should be paid to the work on the lexical aspect of the language. Mastering the vocabulary of a professional foreign language means:

1) to learn the meaning of lexical minimum according to the curriculum;

2) learn to use these lexical items in various kinds of speech activity;

3) learn to understand this lexical minimum listening and reading texts.  

     In accordance with the program students should learn at least 2,500 lexical items, including basic terminology on the specialty. One part of the words (less) will be used for the development of speech, and the other - to form the basis of competence to read and translate texts on specialty.  On the one hand, the ststement that for mastering a foreign language a student should know 2.5 thousand foreign words has a certain base as 2.5 thousand words are used in about 50% of cases, i.e. they are the most commonly used. But this statement has some drawbacks:

- it is not clear whether the students are required to know these words actively or passively;

- set phrases are not taken into account, such as, for example, for engineering specialties: instrumental panel, brake pedal, seat belt, internal combustion engine, final drive and others.   

         For the last few years in Kazakhstan a lot of auto service companies with equipment, tools and accessories of famous foreign manufacturers have started to appear and we believe it is appropriate to use such types of technical texts for engineering students as: scientific and technical books on road service; catalogs and brochures for equipment, instruments, devices, tools; the installation and operating instructions supplied with the equipment and devices; passports to the equipment and appliances.   

        Frequency of the use of certain lexical items can be determined by analyzing the above texts with the help of the program Microsoft Word. Using this program, you can find the frequency of the use of lexical units, and the most common usage of contexts. The algorithm for determining the frequency is:

1. Enter the text in the text editor Word.

2. Select the desired lexical unit.

3. Press Ctrl - C (separately).

4. In the option "Edit" click on the button "Find".

5. Press Ctrl - V (separately).

6. Determine the frequency of the use of the introduced lexical unit.   

      The next stage of the selection of productive lexical minimum is to identify functional relationships between previously selected language units. The most universal types of semantic relationships between words are paradigmatic relations, forming the basis for grouping the words into semantic classes of units, identical in fulfillment of their functions in the utterance, and syntagmatic relations in which units are combined to build speech utterances.   

        Paradigmatic relations are relations of synonymy, antonymy, conversion ratios gender - aspect / aspect-gender, invariant - variant. Syntagmatic connections can be presented by syntactic and lexical combinations of words in the text. The analysis of the literature on engineering specialty made it possible to determine the following types of the most common syntagmatic relations of words (abbreviations: N - noun, V - verb, Adj - adjective, Prep - preposition, Adv - adverb): 1. N + Adj ( Adj + N); 2. N + Prep + N; 3. V + N (V + Prep + N); 4. V + Adj; 5.  V + Adv; 6. N + N + N. 

       Identifying systemic links between words allows not only efficiently select lexical minimum, but use it as a way of organizing the lexical minimum. Check of optimal selection, in order to reduce subjectivity which is inevitably present during the selection of productive and receptive vocabulary, is performed experimentally during training. The adjustments are made accordingly after checking.   Having analyzed the material we found that the types of texts we selected are characterized by certain grammatical structures, such as: modal verb + passive infinitive, a noun in the function of an attribute, gerund, a verbal noun, and the infinitive in the function of an adverbial modifier. These conclusions are supported by conducted selection of lexical material. Thus, the algorithm of selection of lexical minimum is:  

  -   Selection of literature on the specialty;  

-         Check the frequency of use of lexical items;   

-         Identification of functional relationships of selected items;   

-         The identification of the grammatical structures;   

-         Check of optimality selection experimentally.                                               

                                                    Literature:

1. Kolyadko S.V. Language education in higher learning institution, edited by Kolkova M.K.  SPb.: Karo, 2005

2. Karaulov Yu.N Linguistic construction and literary language thesaurus Moscow: Nauka, 1981

3. Slastenin V.A. Pedagogy of Professional Education M: ACADEMA, 2006