Ôèëîëîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè / 1. Ìåòîäèêà ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ ÿçûêà è
ëèòåðàòóðû
Ê.ôèëîë.í. Àíäðåéêî Ë.Â.
ÄÂÍÇ «Óêðàèíñêàÿ
àêàäåìèÿ áàíêîâñêîãî äåëà ÍÁÓ»
Classroom
Interaction In Teaching English
The ultimate goal
of learning a new language is to use it in communication in its spoken or
written forms. Interaction as the heart of communication plays an important
role in an ESL learner’s development of language proficiency.
There are different
types of classroom interaction teacher can use to vary his or her lesson plan. Teacher-centered
activity is when the teacher controls the group. This can consist of lecturing,
explaining a new grammar concept on the board, having a whole-class discussion,
choral drilling or asking individual students questions. However, as L. Jones notes [1,
p.25], students can’t be “taught” – they can only be helped
to learn. So teacher’s role is to help and encourage students to develop their
skills, but without relinquishing a more traditional role as a source of
information, advice, and knowledge.
Teacher-Student
interaction can be mostly found in traditional ESL classrooms in which the
teacher posts a question and then the students answer it. The teacher’s role is
the controller who dominates the entire process of teaching and learning.
The arguments for this approach grow from the idea
that teacher knows more of the target language and that by listening to him or
her, the learner is somehow absorbing a correct picture of the language; that
by interacting with the teacher, the learner is learning to interact with a
competent user of the language; that this is far more useful than talking to a
poor user. This is OK as far as it goes, but there are a number of challenges
to the statements. Most of the time the effectiveness of such interaction is
largely reduced since the teacher occupies the major proportion of a class hour
thus each student’s chance for communicating or interacting is very limited. Jim Scrivener sums it up, “An essential
lesson that every new teacher needs to learn is that “talking at” the lesson
does not necessarily mean that learning is taking place; in many cases, TTT
(Teacher Talking Time) is actually time when the learners are not doing very much and are not very involved” [2, p.59].
The teacher and students should be a team working
together. At different times in a
lesson, teacher’s role may change as the lesson moves from teacher-led to
student-centered and back again. Teachers are responsible for helping students
work independently, monitoring them while they’re working together, and giving
them feedback afterward. In a whole-class activity, students and the teacher
interact, and students accept the authority of the teacher as their manager.
When working together, students will be responsible for their own behavior and
learning while the teacher walks around the classroom monitoring. At first,
some students may be too dependent on their teacher and expect to be helped,
corrected, and encouraged all the time. In this case, teacher can put them into
groups with less teacher-dependent students, and not pair them up with equally
diffident students. It may take some time before they become more independent.
Thus, instead of two minutes' speaking time in a whole lesson, they all get a
lot of speaking practice within a short space of time. Teacher could use this
time effectively by discreetly monitoring what the students are saying and
using the information collected as a source of material for future feedback or
other work.
However, there are still some advantages for
teacher-student interaction in the classroom. The students could immediately
get feedback from the teacher when he/she answers the teacher’s question. It is
a more straightforward way than other kinds of interactions. It is especially
useful for lower level ESL students since it require teachers talk more and the
students talk less.
Let’s have a
closer look at the second kind of in-classroom interaction −
student-student interaction. The most common type of this kind of interaction
relies in group work or peer work. In this form of interaction, the teacher
plays a role as a monitor and the students are the main participants of those
interactional activities. The students will feel less stressful when they group
with their classmates for discussing. As the teacher plays a less dominant role
in group work or pair work, the students are the dominant part in their own
interaction process. They may feel less stressed and nervous when they interact
with their peers. The students have an intention to help the other students
when they make errors, moreover, they will develop self-correcting ability as
they learn to avoid making the same mistakes that others have made before.
Through the interaction of group or pair work, ESL students can help others
find their error pattern as well as avoiding errors they see others make.
However, in the class divided into small groups, it is
harder for the teacher to know what is exactly going on in each group. In view
of this, the teacher should provide clear guidance and directions before they
ask the students to practice interactional activities in their respective
groups.
There is another interesting question: when should
students work in pairs and when should they be in groups or work together as a
whole class? L. Jones has such recommendations:
-
Put talkative students in groups of
three and less talkative students in groups of four or five.
-
Stimulate a better exchange of ideas by putting shy students in groups
of three rather than in pairs.
-
Sometimes have two students talk
while a third listens and takes notes, then have the third provide feedback at
the end of the conversation [1, p.8].
Jim Scrivener gives some ideas for maximizing student interaction in class:
-
Encourage a friendly, relaxed
learning environment. If there is a trusting,
positive, supportive rapport amongst the learners and be between
learners and
the teacher, then there is a much better chance of useful interaction
happening.
-
Ask questions rather than giving
explanations.
-
Allow time for students to listen,
think, process their answer and speak.
-
Really listen to what they s ay. Let what they say really affect
what you do next.
-
Work on listening to the person and
the meaning, as well as to the language and the mistakes.
-
Allow thinking time without talking
over it. Allow silence.
-
Increase opportunities for STT
(Student Talking Time).
-
Use gestures to replace unnecessary
teacher talk.
-
Allow students to finish their own
sentences.
-
Make use of pairs and small groups
to maximize opportunities for students to speak. Do this even in the middle of
longer whole-class stages, for example ask students to break off for 30 seconds
and talk in pairs about their reactions to what you've just been discussing and
also allow them to check answers to tasks before conducting feedback.
-
If possible, arrange seating so that
students can all see each other and talk to each other (i.e. circles, squares
and horseshoes rather than parallel rows).
-
Remember that you don't always need
to be at the front of the class. Try out
seating arrangements that allow the whole class to be the focus (e.g.
you take one
seat in a circle).
-
If a student is speaking too quietly
for you to hear, walk further away, rather
than closer to them (This sounds illogical, but if you can't hear them,
then it's
likely that the other students can't either. Encourage the quiet speaker
to speak
louder so that the others can hear.)
-
Encourage interaction between
students rather than only between student and you, and you and student. Get
students ask questions, give explanations, etc. to each other, rather than
always to you. Use gestures and facial expressions to encourage them to speak
and listen to each other [2, p.60].
With this in mind it would be fair to note that
students should not work in pairs or groups all
the time. As students become more confident, they will do more and more
student-centered work, but teachers must strike a balance between leading the
students and letting them have control of their learning.
References:
1. Jones, L. The Student-centered Classroom / Leo Jones.─ Cambridge
University Press, 2007. ─ 41p.
2. Scrivener, J. Learning Teaching: 3rd Edition / Jim Scrivener.
─ Mcmillan Books for Teachers, 2011. ─ 430p.