The main stages in the development of dialogue as a form of communication

 

Ispandiyarova AT, Art. Lecturer, Department of Linguistics practical Kostanay State University. A.Baitursynov

 

  Forms of speech , accepted in society , are directly dependent on forms of power : a totalitarian state implants monologue ( from the Greek monos - one , logos - speech) as a form of speech that meets its own structure.

      Interpersonal communication can be in different forms , the main of which - the dialogue and monologue. In this paper we consider one of common forms of communication - a dialogue .

      Depending on whether it says one speaker or conversation ( debate ) involves two ( several persons ) we are talking about a monologue (this one ) and dialogue (from the Greek . Dialogos - a conversation between two or more persons ) . Known more polylogue term ( from grech.poly - a lot) , which is used when they want to emphasize that in a conversation attended by many.

      Truly dialogic always been controversy and debate , the various conversations . Rhetoric offers such a classification :

1) casual conversation and good friends, loved ones ;

2) the first conversation , when meeting ;

3) business conversation , which is represented by different species;

     a) equal conversation partners;

     b) Talk to superior and subordinate ;

     c) talk about the cooperation between the two parties' representatives ;

4) table-talk ( varying degrees of formality , often leading ) .

   Typology of public appearances and interviews allows to make a clear understanding of their content and predict verbal behavior of speakers . [2 ]

     Dialogue as an independent literary -philosophical genre appeared only in ancient Greece during the exacerbation of the ideological struggle , with the development of ancient democracy , as public life was an essential component of the Greek life and considered successful , provided possession skills public speech and public discussion .

    Different types of culture produces certain characteristic forms exchanges . In the Indian tradition , where the struggle between religions are expressed in public debates , preference is given to public debate , held with great pomp , and sometimes even be dramatically .

     The result was the famous " Indian rule dispute" : before you formulate your own idea , you need to install 'viewpoints , refute it , and only then to express their opinions , to justify their position with the opponent.

      Attention Chinese philosophers and logicians have attracted various ways studies, the psychological aspect of the dispute , the problem of clarifying the meaning of concepts and more.

      Thus , the followers of the philosopher Mo Di , founder moizma , considered such conditions dispute :

     a) if the judgment are identical, there can be no dispute;

     ә ) the dispute is born in the presence of different judgments about the subject one thought;

     c) wins the dispute one whose opinion is true, etc.

Dialogic form of presentation only gets methodical development of Plato . In the theory of dialogue Plato put goal - finding knowledge that has universal significance , as opposed to subjective truth of the Sophists . His dialogue not only eliminates any roughness between the interlocutors and personal misunderstandings , but is usually completed , prosperous outcome co - finding the truth. His dialogue about moral responsibility for the misuse of their speaking abilities formal rhetoric. Plato's dialogue is based on the principle of a special composite - phased ( progressive ) movement troubled thoughts .

      The first person to "systemically investigated logical nature of dialogue " was Aristotle . In his writings he identifies and analyzes the major types of reasoning depending on the nature of the output : fair is probably false . Having found that the asymmetry of roles sobesednivov entails opposed to their strategies , Aristotle describes in detail the general and specific strategies for specific types of interlocutors dialogues. Most worthy recognized dialogic dispute . [3 ]

     Dialogic speech is to share replicas statements ; it perviyanaya , natural form of language communication.

     Dialogue was also called conversation many cross communication group of individuals with complex interweaving addresser and addressee .

     Depending on the goals set for themselves projecting verbal communication distinguished different types of dialogue builds. Can identify the following objectives , which set themselves interlocutors , engaging in dialogue , to discuss something, than to convince or to inform about anything to argue about which is to encourage the voice or to any other action, request information , request to clarify her express approval or disapproval , Communicative goals led to the emergence of the following functional types. Dialog message information dialog request information , dialogue , motivation, dialogue - questioning . All four functional types of dialogue in aggregate demand manifestations general communicative skills related to the analysis and evaluation of teaching and personal speech situations , as well as the ability to use both verbal and non-verbal means of communication. Besides general , each type of dialogue requires a specific communicative skills. These are the following skills :

     - Dialogue - information request : the ability to set and ask the question ; ability to properly intone statement ; the ability to use a variety of appropriate incentives replica ; the ability to properly use the pause in speech ; the ability to request additional information ;

      - Dialogue message information : the ability to build meaningful informative text; ability to think logically and correctly implement his plan at the level of pronunciation ; ability to attract and retain the attention , right to appeal to the other party ;

     - Dialogue - motivation : the ability to properly formulate the appropriate tone and say the request , the order ; skill appropriate to use the incentive proposals replica stimulus ; the ability to specify the job ;

     - Dialogue - questioning : the ability to self-determination regarding the information received ; Ability to formulate the problematic issues that support dialogue ; ability to build a communicative expedient strategy and tactics of verbal behavior . [3 ]

 

References

1. Golub IB Art of rhetoric . Manual for eloquence. Rostov n / a : Phoenix, 2005 . (Series "Empire of Success" )

2 . Lviv MR Rhetoric . Culture rechi.-M. : Publishing Center "Academy" , 2003

3 . Rhetoric and Oratory : Textbook / author-composer I.N.Kuznetsov -M , 2004

4 . Rhetoric: A Textbook / obsch.red N.A.Ippolitovoy . , M. , 2006

5 . Rhetoric: A Textbook / Society. Red N.A.Ippolitovoy . , M. , 2006, p 375-376