P. T. Abdullaeva

Al-Farabi Kazakh national University, Kazakhstan, Almaty

E-mail: abdullaeva_perizat@mail.ru

 

 

THE EDUCATIONAL BOOK OF A PEDAGOGICAL PROFILE AS A DIDACTIC CONTROL FACILITY TRAINING OF THE EXPERT IN THE CONDITIONS OF A VERSATILE MAGISTRACY

 

Formation of the new model of higher educational institutions based on the innovative system forming a network of management of knowledge, supporting production and a transfer of new knowledge and technologies motivation of innovative behavior demands reconsideration of a role and functions of scientific and methodical ensuring educational process of higher education institution.

Modern scientific and methodical providing the maintenance of the higher pedagogical education in connection with growth of information and fast obsolescence of knowledge leads to revision and processing of the content of education.

 In this regard questions of creation and development of new textbooks and educational and methodical complexes, the practician and the theory of their analysis, cause constant interest, it is connected and with that that, the educational book is considered as the main tutorial and education of future experts.

The new world outlook and didactic organization of the higher professional pedagogical education expressed through Gosstandart is directed on a fundamentalization and humanitarization of education which stimulates growth of the knowledge base, in change of their specifics; introduction information technologies in the course of training as means of radical increase of efficiency of training of the expert; intensification of independent work of students/1, 24/. All these innovations impose new requirements to the substantial party of educational process and, therefore, contents of the educational book of a pedagogical profile.

According to it, we consider that the educational book for higher education institutions has to conform to certain scientific and methodical requirements.

First of all is an optimality of volume of the contents, its sufficiency and completeness. Contents volume (for 3 credits optimum 8-10 items of l. educational text). Novelty of the contents is not less important (development of scientific and technical progress imposes requirements of updating of the content of education, in particular contents of the manual). Updating of textbooks in rules of licensing makes a reservation 5 years for social and humanitarian disciplines and 10 years for natural-science disciplines.

And as for the contents, especially important is a scientific and methodical and culturological level of the contents of the educational book here.

Obligatory is a compliance to requirements of Gosstandart of pedagogical education and to standard programs for the higher pedagogical education.

Following requirement: didactic level of the educational book, it training the potential, that is availability, ability to provide the developing material and to stimulate independent work. Also the personal focused, competence-based approaches have to be considered. Didactic level of the educational book is provided with originality and novelty of ways of creation of a training material (dialogicity: address to students, giving of various points of view, strong and weaknesses of the phenomena, processes, etc.), problematical character, reflexivity (stimulation of reflection, introspection, introspection, self-assessment of students, development of system of a self-assessment of processes by them, phenomena, etc.), contents praсtisedestination.

Are also important opportunity to enter the educational book in the scientific and pedagogical concept of the teacher, its correlation with the working plan and the schedule of educational process, i.e. providing with it the developed system of the organization of educational process and possibility of use in the changing prospect.

The main objective of our education has to have impact on selection of a training material for the book of a pedagogical profile – not only to give knowledge and to teach to use them, but also to check efficiency of their assimilation. The Polifonichnost of the Kazakhstan education is based on review and assimilation new with an obligatory exit to higher level. At foreign universities the main objective of education is granting opportunity to study, and control of knowledge is provided only at the exit.

Besides, it is necessary to consider essentially different ratios of classroom and out-of-class occupations. The volume of classroom occupations at us are twice more, than in foreign higher education institutions, and it doesn't allow to place emphasis on mainly independence

In addition to the general requirements imposed to the educational book specific requirements to the educational literature of a pedagogical profile which is closely connected with pressing problems of life are revealed.

Reorientation of all humanitarian cycle to development in undergraduates of responsibility for valid values, formation of installations at them on free world outlook self-determination, common cultural competence, self-realization and self-updating/2/becomes the starting moment of a solution of the problem of coordination of a new paradigm of arts education (which treats also pedagogical) with didactic tradition.

The formed content of scientific and pedagogical education at a step of a magistracy provides education of patriotic and civil feelings, both at the teacher of the higher school, and at the student without what education loses meaning. The special attention when determining requirements to creation of the educational book is deserved by the accounting of national mentality, traditions and experience.

In the educational books providing the substantial party of pedagogical preparation in a versatile magistracy the variety of factors of development of world and domestic pedagogical science/3/reveals. Their main objective – to teach future professional to own practice of the independent social and pedagogical analysis. For self-determination and education at undergraduates of pedagogical culture at selection of a training material the close attention was paid to the description of dynamic, multivariable educational process.

It should be noted one more important feature of again created educational books – in them emphases on self-education and formation of humanitarian consciousness are strengthened. The variety of theoretical and methodological pluralism according to pedagogical discipline, debatability and a polemichnost of a statement in new educational books is explained by it.

The maintenance of educational literature of a pedagogical profile is connected with a complex of the qualification requirements reflecting the professional level of training of future expert. Feature of a training material consists in need of its continuous updating, editing/4/.

If for bachelors the principle of concreteness (their structure generally corresponds to traditional structure of the classical textbook in which the principles of progressiveness and recurrence of a statement of material are observed) is the cornerstone of preparation of educational books, for undergraduates the activity principle is the cornerstone of preparation of educational books: process of assignment, reproduction and processing by trainees of knowledge and functions of the professional assumes need of implementation in relation to them the practical and cognitive activity adequate to the human activity embodied in them (A.N. Leontyev), i.e. selection of scientific professional knowledge, its structurization occurred taking into account requirements of a concrete look and form of activity of future expert.

At creation of educational books for undergraduates the level of their preparation, possibility of realization of individual training, ability to self-training and interdisciplinary nature of training has to be considered.

When developing educational literature for a versatile magistracy of university it is possible to carry a task of the accounting of the specific abilities of conceptual and terminological character inherent in the different directions/5/to the major tasks.

At analytical comparison of character of a statement and structure of the content of education some types of books that will serve as a creative sample at further improvement of educational books of a pedagogical profile in a magistracy of university are revealed:

Convection (systematic), corresponding to traditions and having encyclopedic or monographic character. Realizes information function.

2. Programmed, has an appearance of the branched or linear program.

3. Problem, based on the theory of problem training.

4. Combined (universal), containing separate elements of other models.

5. Variable. Training provides professional and personal development of the expert and is focused on formation of creative identity. Consists of two subsystems: the invariatn providing basic knowledge of undergraduates irrespective of their specialization and variable, corresponding to individual inquiries of the identity of future expert.

6. The author's textbook is characterized by kontseptulyany independence. It is developed for undergraduates of a certain specialty taking into account a certain number of lecture hours, and also existence of a laboratory and practical training.

7. The alternative textbook is created according to own training program, with the indication of differences from the standard training program.

Work on creation of the high school educational book on a pedagogical cycle of disciplines on the basis of department of the general and ethnic pedagogics of al-Farabi the general recommendations about his creation allow to formulate TREASURY, main from which are the following:

1. Definition of a role and place of this subject matter in training of the expert taking into account the qualification characteristic and the training program and a specification on this basis of the problems of training and education solved in the course of teaching a course.

2. Determination of character and volume of knowledge which have to be acquired by the student when studying all course, its subjects and each question of a subject.

3. Identification (by the curriculum, programs and textbooks) the volume of the knowledge gained as a result of studying of earlier passable disciplines, and use of results of this identification at determination of character and volume of knowledge of each question of a subject of each subject and at all course.

4. Definition of logical and didactic sequence of transfer of educational information for acquisition of knowledge, developments of skills, reproduction and use of the previous knowledge when studying each question of a subject, each subject and all course.

5. Development of structure of the textbook, division of the stated program material into methodically justified structural elements: sections, chapters, paragraphs.

6. Development on the basis of the accepted structure of the project plan of future textbook and its assessment. 

7. Development of paragraphs according to the contents: division of the contents of the paragraph into parts and selection for each part of the paragraph of the corresponding form of expression (the text, illustrations, tables, etc.); registration of components of the paragraph, i.e. maintenance of its parts, in unity with a form of submission of information; modeling of cognitive activity of students when studying the paragraph and using its results in specification of the contents of the paragraph; design of ways of fixing of knowledge and skills and implementation of feedback; definition of communications with other tutorials.

8. Registration of chapters of the textbook, placement of paragraphs taking into account sequence and logicality of a statement of educational information.

9. Registration of the textbook in general.

Thus, in spite of the fact that the educational book in broad understanding is the fullest information model of the pedagogical system independent of character of the used carrier of educational information, we consider that the ordinary understanding of educational literature in modern conditions is limited. It not only constrains development of the pedagogical theory and practice, but also doesn't promote trained at all as persons to work on the inner world, to cultivate culture of pedagogical thinking (considering domestic specifics and modern realities of the higher education), i.e. prevents to use the educational book as a control facility training of the expert.

 

 

The list of the used literature

 

1. Verbitsky A.A. Active training at the higher school: contextual approach – M.: The higher school 1991.

2. Vzyatyshev V., Romanova L., Sergiyevsky Century. From consciousness of a paradigm to educational practice//the Higher education in Russia. 1995, No. 3, page 35-44

3. The state requirements to a minimum of the contents and professional standard of the graduate of a magistracy for obtaining additional qualification "The teacher of the higher school"//the Bulletin of the Ministry of the general and professional education of the Russian Federation//the Higher and secondary education, 1997, No. 7, page 9-16

4. Lednev V. S. Content of education. – M 1989, page 138

5. Pedagogics and psychology of the higher school. / Under the editorship of S. I. Samygin. – Rostov-on to Don: A phoenix, 1998, with - 45-46