Philosophy / 2. Social philosophy
Yaroslavtseva
T.A.
Donetsk National University
of Economics and Trade after M. Tugan-Baranovsky
Problems of
modern Ukrainian family
Problems
of family are very relevant in today's society, because we often forget about
the place that occupies family in the lives of everyone. Among western scholars
the thought that modern family is in the deep crisis is widespread, moreover,
almost in all developed societies. Among them there are societies overtaken by
the crisis as ours and quite successful in economic terms Europe and the USA,
countries in Asia and Latin America.
The
aim of our work is to analyze and study the development of Ukrainian family.
The
crisis of modern family manifests itself in such facts of family life:
decreasing the birth child, increasing the number of divorces, growing number
of single parent families and children born out of wedlock; increase in
childless families, late marriages, and growing number of couples without
marriage registration.
What
are the reasons of this phenomenon? The point is that as an initial element of
society, the family reflects the same contradiction inherent in the society.
Modern family has come under the influence of few global worldwide trends. The
scientists point out the growing role of women in economic, cultural and
political spheres of social life (these factors awake their desire for greater
independence, they review the structure of traditional family relations of
equality with men in decision-making), the formation of two centers of the life
– work and home (formerly professional activities and household existed in
unity); evolution of the views of society on sexual morality; global trends of
the late 20th century, related to the informatization of society,
new areas of development, personal growth potential [1].
All
these trends are connected mainly with the transition of many modern societies
to «industrial» and «post-industrial» stage of development. Some researchers
even believe that at this stage the majority of social functions of the family
disappear. With the development of urban life and the constant decline of the
part of countries’ population, it has become more difficult to characterize
family as an economic unit of the society.
The
role of family in the process of human reproduction is also changing. The
births out of wedlock are growing (nearly every fifth child born in Ukraine are
now out of wedlock). In urban areas there are fewer children than in rural
areas where the presence of more labor in the family has always been the key to
greater efficiency of its economy. The level of women education and the
informatization of the society influence the number of children in the family
as well as urbanization and related ecology. The development of information
production requires a correspondence between modern technology and the ability
of people to work: its general culture, information, intellectual abilities,
professionalism, health, interest in work, capacity for rapid adaptation, the
ability to make independent decisions. The person in the information society
will be engaged in higher levels of education, awareness, health, good shape
(statistics show that every decade people are increasingly spending their time
training on keeping fit and healthy). To increase employee quality under the
living conditions and facilities, which include level of education and culture,
housing, nutrition, services and health care, recreational opportunities, should
be established. In other words, the demand for quality of life has been
constantly increasing. These demands put the family in terms of restricting the
number of children in the family, because the large number of them leads to
lower quality of life of its members (20% of Ukrainian families did not want to
have them) [2].
In
addition, a modern man is less educated in the family than he/she was in the
past, when the representatives of the dominant classes and the ordinary people
received home education. Even at the beginning of the century the majority of
the population of the Russian Empire either had no education at all, or studied
for 2-4 years in primary and parochial schools. Almost all the knowledge, which
was useful in life and country youth and people from lower levels of the urban
population received from parents. In modern world there are a lot of agencies
and social institutions that assume the functions of education of young
generation. Among them there are: kindergarten and school, the system of
vocational education, higher educational institutions, community organizations,
local governments and the media. American scientists have calculated that their
students spend more time on TV than on the communication with parents, thus we
can talk about reducing and reproducing social and family functions.
The
loss of social value of family has led to the fact that the basis for marriage
is gradually becoming only the intimate sphere. Therefore, characteristic
feature of the modern family is the autonomy of its members. The higher level
of cultural and civilization development of society, the more each member of
this society regards himself as an individual, the greater the need for
separation is. In a family the autonomy points out in that the interests of
both members of a marriage is much wider than purely family and circle of
meaningful dialogue for them beyond its borders. Family actively responds to
the growing autonomy of its members. The new forms of family structures appear:
marriage contracts for a certain time, marriage with three-year probation (no
birth), "civil marriage" (marriage with the concern of the parties,
but without registration) "Distance marriages” (separated spouses with
occasional meetings)," "concubinage" (when a family broke up and
its members have their own lives, but children are brought up together) [1].
Some
scientists are already talking about the decline of the nuclear family and its
disappearance, whereas the majority believes that family will remain in society
in the future but it will lose its aura of "holiness",
"integrity" and "unity" for a person.
Literature
1. Àíòîíîâ À.È., Ìåäêîâ Â.Ì. Ñîöèîëîãèÿ ñåìüè. Ì.: Èíôðà-Ì, 2007. – 640 ñ.
2. Áóðîâ Ñ.Í. Áðà÷íî-ñåìåéíûå îòíîøåíèÿ. - Ì.: Ýêçàìåí, 2006. – 127 c.
3. Ãðåáåííèêîâ È.Â. Îñíîâû ñåìåéíîé æèçíè. - Ì.: Ïðîñâåùåíèå, 2005. 450 ñ.