Ôèëîëîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè/1. Ìåòîäèêà
ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ ÿçûêà è ëèòåðàòóðû
Ñò.ïðåïîäàâàòåëü,
Ô¸äîðîâà Ì.Ë.
Êîñòàíàéñêèé
ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé óíèâåðñèòåò èì.À.Áàéòóðñûíîâà
On metacognitive strategies in
teaching foreign languages
Formation
of abilities of independent development of language skills should become an
integral part of students’ training to a foreign language in higher educational
establishments. In the development of the autonomy of educational skills, it
should be noted that the researchers identify implicit and explicit methods of
administration, and the formation of learning strategies. The first - the
student masters the strategy of simply doing a job, not having been informed
about the purpose and value of a single strategy, i.e. unconsciously
(unreflected formation of educational strategies). The second - the learner
informed, how to use this strategy, as it is useful in a certain kind of work
,it allows students to master consciously the learning strategy, understanding
the psychological mechanisms of executable action, as their individual
psychological characteristics. The formation of metacognitive strategies in
students is undoubtedly able to improve the efficiency of learning a foreign
language. Nowadays English language teachers have benefited from a growing body
of research that describes how learning strategies can help students improve
their acquisition of the language. Learning strategies are organized into three
main categories: social-affective, cognitive, and metacognitive.
Social-affective strategies include interacting and cooperating with others to
assist learning; cognitive strategies involve manipulating the language to be
learned; and metacognitive strategies encourage learners to reflect on thought
processes and to plan, monitor, and evaluate aspects of their learning. These
strategies can be valuable instructional tools, especially for the reading
skill, because many teachers find that there is insufficient practice time for
students who are required to cope with studying a new language and to read for
content. The need is heightened because at the post-secondary level, and
particularly in universities English suddenly becomes increasingly important
for students who must learn the
professionally-oriented foreign language and read technical subject matter in
English. It is important to encourage activities that require the use of
strategies such as scanning (reading a text quickly for specific details), and
skimming (reading or previewing a text to find the main idea), at the lessons
these terms are no more than clichés, and very little training is
provided on how to actually use these strategies. As a result, students
experience difficulties when reading research articles in subjects related to
science and technology. In this context, where being able to read efficiently
and effectively is essential for academic success, training students to use
learning strategies can have a significant effect. Since the goal of metacognitive
learning strategies is to strengthen students’ awareness of what makes their
language learning successful, it is especially important for the teacher to
understand how to use such strategies. Metacognition and reading indicate that reading long selections of
text quickly for general comprehension, which most fluent readers can do in
their native language, is difficult to achieve and may not be a skill that is
readily transferable to their second language. At the lesson, many students
tend to rely on the slow and careful reading of texts from start to finish, and
they have difficulties with reading activities requiring the use of strategies
for reading quickly and efficiently, such as skimming a lengthy research
article for main ideas. As many practitioners have found, metacognitive
strategies are one way to overcome these problems. Metacognition is variously
defined as “cognition of cognition”, “the conscious awareness of cognitive
process, and “knowledge about learning”. In relation to reading comprehension,
metacognition is the “knowledge that takes as its object or regulates any
aspect of any cognitive endeavor”. This definition suggests that metacognition
not only relates to the individual thought processes one uses to learn but also
to the self-regulation of cognition. Metacognitive strategies include an
ability to manage and regulate consciously the use of appropriate learning
strategies for different situations .They involve an awareness of student’s
mental processes and an ability to reflect on how one learns, in other words,
knowing about one’s knowing.” Metacognitive strategies include selective
attention to the task, planning, self-monitoring, and self-evaluating. As
applied to reading, these metacognitive strategies entail specifying a purpose
for reading, planning how the text will be read, self-monitoring for errors in
reading comprehension, and self-evaluating how well the overall objectives are
being fulfilled, which allows for taking corrective measures if comprehension
is not being achieved.
Even
though students’ reading ability can be improved when they discover and use
specific learning strategies, research indicates that it is not sufficient to
present discrete lists of strategies and suggests that setting up contexts
where the reasons for strategy use are made explicit may help readers better
appreciate strategies and use them more effectively.
However,
with strategy training, readers can make concrete gains in their reading. This
training must be clearly sequenced. In addition, there must be a clear
rationale for using specific strategies. For example, strategy training should
include explicit instructions on when and how to use a particular strategy, and
should incorporate metacognitive elements of planning, self-monitoring, and self-evaluation
into the task. When this is accomplished, metacognitive strategy improves
students’ efficiency in reading research articles, particularly with tasks
requiring fast, selective reading such as skimming.
Any
training technology aims at improving the efficiency of the process of
acquiring and learning new skills through the use of various reserves, e.g. due
to a more rational organization of training, careful planning classroom and
extracurricular work, more focused organization material (use of audio, video
and et al.), a more fruitful use of internal resources of students and others.