Brand Personality
Educational and Research Institute of Economics and
Management,
NUFT
Inna Avramenko
Vira Mirochnyk
Each trademark finds the consumer who makes the
decision on certain reasons. Most consumer brand gives certain characteristics
that are inherent in man, indicating that the personality of the brand. Brand
personality enhances its uniqueness, also enhances the image of the company and
customer loyalty.
"Brand personality" is defined differently.
D. Aaker operationalizes brand personality as the human characteristics of a
brand. These characteristics include: demographic characteristics of the person
(age, sex, social status), lifestyle characteristics (activities, interests),
personal traits (reliability, friendliness, caring, sentiment).
Some companies that work effectively in the market
using the brand personality as a means of expressing its functional benefits. It
is better to create a brand that provides functional benefits than companies
remind consumers that there is a functional benefit.
There are some features of identity of the brand:
• relevance - appearance of the goods, advertising,
packaging, brand name, logo, etc.
• characteristics of the brand - the characteristics
of the group "promise", "expect", "confirm".
It is important that the brand personality and
personality consumer are similar, because if a potential customer is involved
in the communication. Each brand must have a bright personality, based on the
expectations and perceptions of consumers. Each brand must have a bright
personality, based on the expectations and perceptions of consumers. Typically,
brand personality can be described using 7-9 words that describe the brand as
if it were a man.
J. Kunda describes the brand
identity using three characteristics: rational, emotional and spiritual
intelligence.
Intelligence quotient (IQ) shows how subjects make
logical conclusions and solve problems. Emotional intelligence (EQ) is the
ability to navigate the social environment (crisis, conflict, love, joy). The
spiritual intelligence (SQ) is used to provide the value and meaning of events
and experiences. The concept is based on the spiritual and emotional
intelligence to help build a brand relationship with the target audience.
During the formation of the personality of the brand
is very important to understand what it should be. Usually, one of the simplest
methods to determine this issue is a survey of consumers or employees.
Alina Uiller calls the process of forming brand personality as a
"search for creative solutions and their implementation" and divides
it into five phases:
1. research and analysis;
2. choice of strategy;
3. concept development;
4. search for means of expression;
5. asset management.
Some companies are unwilling to invest in brand
personality formation, although it has many advantages, such as:
• Simplification of the decision to purchase. Identity
helps companies create brand image that is easily recognizable, original and
well thought out and that will help achieve success.
• Support sales. Brand personality strategy allows
representatives of different sectors of the population to get an idea about the
product and its benefits.
• Increasing brand equity. Brand and reputation of a
large company is one of the most important and valuable assets. Small companies
also need to increase the value of its own brand, as the performance of the
company depends on the efficiency of the brand.
The personality of the brand itself does not guarantee
success. It is not enough simply to develop a bright logo, create an interesting
title or original packaging. It is necessary to update, configure and monitor
the system to ensure brand personality, because new brand development program
is the initial investment, not the final step.
ÑÏÈÑÎÊ ÂÈÊÎÐÈÑÒÀÍί ˲ÒÅÐÀÒÓÐÈ:
1.
Aaker
J. Dimensions of Brand Personality/ J. Aaker// Journal of Marketing Research. –
1997. – ¹ 34.
–
P.
347-356
2.
Kunde J. Corporate religion/ J. Kunde [Åëåêòðîííèé ðåñóðñ]. – Ðåæèì äîñòóïó: https://www.abebooks.com/servlet
3.
Óèëëåð À. Èíäèâèäóàëüíîñòü áðåíäà.
Ðóêîâîäñòâî ïî ñîçäàíèþ, ïðîäâèæåíèþ è ïîääåðæêå ñèëüíûõ áðåíäîâ / À. Óèëëåð. —
Ì.: Àëüïèíà Ïàáëèøåðç, 2009. – 236 ñ.