Григорьева Е.П.
Уфимского ЮИ МВД РФ
Investigator
Highlighting the
profession of the investigator, it cannot unambiguously be attributed to a single
type. Since the person who conducts the investigation, must have a certain set
of skills. Including, and sports training, as the employee of law enforcement
bodies, and the intellectual data that allow to analyze the situation, to see
and solve the crime, even during his performances. And since the work is aimed
at the elimination of social danger and the rule of law, it includes the social
aspect [1].
The
history of the profession of the investigator is inextricably linked with the
emergence of the concept of crime and the development of such science as
forensics.But the emergence of criminology as a separate science occurred in
the late nineteenth century. Developers considered the French scientist
Alphonse Bertillon and the Austrian Professor Hans gross. Thanks to them were
proposed the first methods of identification: a portrait of the man, including
with the involvement of process photos, and fingerprints. If it comes to
murder, robbery, theft, then often can`t do without such a specialist as an
investigator. He is engaged in analytical and managerial work. First, analyses
of the information collected on the crime, she works primarily with papers:
various documents, expertise and actively participates in the questioning and
leads them on the basis of protocols. Secondly, he controls the actions of
operational staff. The work of the investigator is the excitement and the
criminal investigation and the referral of this case to the court.
It all
starts with the crime scene, where the experts look for and examine evidence
such as fingerprints or weapons burglary or murder. The expert is present
during the inspection and begins to build your logical guesses, and asks
questions and keeps the minutes of answers of witnesses and victims. Gathering
information for the common Protocol of the performed inspection of the crime
scene, the investigator decides what specific action to be taken by the
operatives.
When the Protocol is
ready and the analysis of the collected information, the investigator decides
whether, according to his version of the crime, additional searches and detain
suspects [2].
Possible
evidence can be many, but the task of the investigator as the utmost attention
to them, and the ability to select from the mass of those which may give clues
to the crime. The investigator bears great responsibility in accurately
determining the culprit. If any error occurs the investigation, the offender
will remain unpunished, and the punishment will fall on the shoulders of a man
who is not guilty. Therefore, the investigator does not believe any information
received from witnesses, victims, their families and, of course, from the
suspects. He checks everything. Moreover, the investigator must have the talent
to know the truth from suspects, even those who did not intend him the truth to
provide and, on the contrary, he intended to hide. And the point here is not
the compulsion to tell the truth, and the special logic techniques and tactical
moves that should be possessed by the investigator. Therefore the investigator
must be emotionally stable and prepared, trained to resist the onslaught of
aggressive people and do not believe it is possible deceitful arguments, and
apply only logic and rely on the already known and analyzed accurate
information. All of these skills are also useful to the investigator and in the
conduct of confrontations, where they meet witnesses, contradicting each other
in their testimony, and investigative experiments, where the suspect fakes, how
the crime was committed [3].
After the crime, all
documents, protocols, and examination are transmitted to the court as a
criminal case.
It should be noted that
the work of the investigator is difficult and dangerous. Difficult because it
requires endurance to attend crime scenes at any time of day and in any weather
conditions. And dangerous because the investigator may be assassinated, or he
can threaten.
List of References
1. Буева Л. П. Человек: деятельность и общение. –
М., 1978, стр. 34-56.
2. Хлынцов М. Н. Проверка показаний на месте. – Саратов,
1971, стр. 65-66.
3. Козелецкий Ю. Психологическая теория решений –
М., 1979, стр. 23-24