Педагогические науки/ 5. Современные методы преподавания.
Svetlana Avagyan
National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI”
STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING DEVELOPMENT ON FOREIGN
LANGUAGE LESSONS
One of the main
tasks of modern higher institutions is to develop each student’s capability, to
educate an individual, who is ready for the life in this hi-tech,
achievement-oriented world. Modern society hence modern education needs free,
creative individuals, who have a specific way of thinking. Free way of thinking
is considered to be its critical side oriented at creative and constructed
activity. Therefore critical thinking is a free personality quality way of
thinking.
Researchers have
shown that most students today are weak in critical thinking skills. They
fulfill simple logical reasoning tests poorly (Evans, 2002). This problem
applies to both reading and writing. Quite few students demonstrate the
proficiency to write well organized essays that consisted of clear arguments.
The aim of this
paper is not only developing the meaning and the role of critical thinking in
teaching foreign languages but discovering its methods in the process of
students’ learning foreign languages. Theoretical study of scientific
literature of this theme as well practical study of teaching foreign languages
in universities show the actuality of the problem in present days. Also it is
not developed enough, so there is a necessity of model building for students’
critical thinking development and checking the effectiveness of its realization
in the process of learning foreign languages.
1. Approaches,
terms and methods of students’ critical thinking development.
Model building
is one of the essential categories of knowledge. Any scientific research method
either experimental or theoretical is based on the idea of model building.
The
effectiveness of students’ critical thinking development is determined by
approaches, aims and tasks, contents, terms and methods. “Human thinking cannot
exist out of language, out of stored knowledge of human being and produced his
ways of thinking activity.” – wrote Leont'ev A. N. [2, c.61]. The aim of model
is to develop students’ critical thinking in the process of learning foreign
languages.
The highlighted
approaches like 1) systematic, 2) cognitive communicative, 3)
personal-oriented, 4) activity are going to be discussed in more detail. Under
approach we understand common theoretical and practical position, which
determines first, learning strategy and principle, second methods and ways of
teaching.
Systematic Approach
There is not
only possibility but necessity of systematic process and teaching materials
structured presentation in the process of learning foreign languages. For
example, it is impossible to realize the program of educational course “Foreign
Language” without systematization and structural training materials. Teachers,
who bring critical thinking learning in the classroom, spend significantly
large ground work for structuring and organizing educational materials, also
setting the structural and functional connections between its fragments.
Structured and systematic educational material, where structural and functional
connections between fragments are clearly specified, is more easily absorbed
and better understood by students.
Cognitive Communicative Approach
This approach
intends the following:
-
Knowledge of teaching and learning activities, which perform the
function landmarks and the development of different groups of educational and
linguistic, cognitive, reflective skills and cognitive strategies is based on
knowledge;
-
Cognitive tasks solving, which is performed on the base of knowledge,
cognitive skills and ways of cognitive activity in students individual work in
the choice of cognitive strategies;
-
The process of critical thinking development built on the general
subject of cognitive knowledge, skills and ways of activity transfer to subject
knowledge, skills and ways of activity (subject matter of cognitive component).
It gives an opportunity to form generalized methods and ways of activity, work
out cognitive strategy, allowing students solve problems and accomplish
cognitive activity individually.
Personal-oriented approach
This approach intends
students’ development as a cognitive activity subject, which foresees set of
characteristic development, cognitive ability and willingness development. One
of the leading should be considered willingness to further development,
providing students’ personality development in principal directions. These are
motivation and motivational willingness, adopted knowledge and students own
activities reflection, knowledge consistency, means and technique activity
development.
Activity Approach
This approach was highlighted in psychology
by Vygotskij L. S. [1], Leont'ev A. N. [3], Jel'konin D. B. [4] and
others. This intends knowledge and
value system refreshment, new experiment creation in the process of learning
foreign languages, and character building by involving students in a dynamic
cognitive activity. Foreign language is used as a means of performing cognitive
activity, self-knowledge acquisition, skills and abilities in different areas
of human knowledge, which is connected with either communication, interaction,
reflection or their functions. Functions are following: contact and information
(communication), understanding and establishing relationships, emotive
(reflection), motive, coordination and influencing (interaction) and types of
communication.
In conclusion would be
right to mention that students’ critical thinking development is based on above
mentioned approaches, which implementation provides effective development of
critical thinking in the process of learning foreign languages.
Reference:
1.
Выготский
Л. С. (1991). Проблема культурного
развития ребенка № 4 Серия 14. Москва: Вестник Московского университета.
Психология. С.5-19.
2.
Леонтьев
А. Н. (2000). Лекции по общей психологии: учеб. для вузов по специальности
«психология». Москва: Смысл. 509 с.
3.
Леонтьев
А. Н. (1999). Эволюция психики. Воронеж:
242 с.
4.
Эльконин
Д. Б. (1986). Проблемы развивающего обучения. Москва: Просвещение.
184 с.