Sadullaeva A.P., Ablakimova Zh.

Kazakh National University named after al-Farabi

 

"The gold standard" as world currency system

 

Today in the world the question of adoption of the gold standard as world currency system is considered.  Likely much know that increase of the price of dollar that led to devaluation for this day is the reason of it.

          Without paying attention that for many centuries of a condition of human life and its value considerably changed, gold all as is in the price.  In the conditions of crisis, any citizen of our country will invest money in precious metal, than in the large enterprise rather.

          When the currency goes down in price, all your securities strongly become cheaper, and deposits in bank are devoured by inflation – many people find the rescue in gold. Only for last some year gold considerably grew in price that allowed investors who enclosed earlier the accumulation in gold, to earn to ninety percent of net income. However such unimaginable profitability from gold can be expected only at very quite good calculation and truly chosen tactics because if you simply buy up many gold products – that you will make the silliest mistake in the life. But at the correct deal you get profit as gold doesn't go down in price.

          Here it would be desirable to note advantages of "the gold standard" or introduction gold as world currency system:

• relative high cost,

• durability, stability at storage,

• divisibility and jointness,

• possibility of identification on color, weight, malleability degrees, to acoustic properties.

          As we know a turn gold stopped 1971 and refusal of the gold standard and transition to modern monetary policy — this one of key macroeconomic inventions of the XX century. But it isn't necessary to forget that among not economists in recent years conversations on the gold standard became the extremely popular. One of leading candidates from Republican Party of the USA in presidents - Ron Paul - made the gold standard a key question of the election program. Why appeals to return to the gold standard became so widespread right now?

          The answer is very simple - crisis of 2008, bankruptcy, apparently, financial institutions and decrease in ratings of the leading western countries aggravated a question of "safe assets". Safe assets play an extremely important role in economy. Demand for safe assets is in any economy. For this reason now — at huge budgetary problems in America and Europe — the American and German bonds manage to be placed under zero profitability. After all these papers are perceived by investors as risk-free.

It would seem, it is easy to solve a problem of safe assets just by means of introduction of the gold standard. After all gold — unlike paper money — is a real asset. Unfortunately, everything isn't so simple. Let's say that the dollar is attached to gold at a rigid course — for example as it was till 1971, at the level of $35 for ounce or at the level of the today's prices (in 45 times more). In this case from the point of view of a purchase power in gold grams dollar it will be valid a risk-free asset — it always will cost exactly so many grams of gold, how many is declared. The problem that from the point of view of economy it is senseless — after all gold doesn't play a big role neither lives of house farms, nor in activity of the enterprises. The total amount of consumption of gold in the jeweler industry — about $80 billion a year, in other industries — $15-20 billion. It is a small share of world gross domestic product and barter. For comparison: in the world it is got oil on $3 trillion a year (if to consider at world market prices).

          But neither oil, nor gold in itself aren't a key consumed product - both house farms, and the enterprises consume a wide basket of products and services.  Therefore a safe asset what profitability is predictable not in relation to any one product, and on the relation to all consumer basket (or, for example, to the basket making gross domestic product of the country).

          On these indicators for the last five years purchasing power of dollar practically didn't change. At the same time, if to measure purchasing power of dollar in ounces of gold or oil barrels, it changed many times. It is clear that this way is unreliable. Despite all this, gold is much more risky asset, than paper dollar.

          In the conclusion it would be desirable to tell that application of the gold standard non-optimal for our time.  You could be convinced of it on the above-stated examples.  The are some reasons:  lack of the general quantity gold as gold is impossible to create (at world level large turns of money) ;  the overall price level only is stable when the relative price of gold and other goods and services is stable;  and at the end gold simply isn't the main product in a household and in the enterprise.

          Certainly it is impossible to note and advantage of the gold standard, but in total plus is only that that it can stop dollar "invasion".  But it isn't the basis use of the gold standard.  We can't lean only on it.

          In our opinion, the only exit from devaluation of dollar is an introduction of new world currency system. Certainly it is improbable to introduce new currency system for short time, but it is already possible to consider this question and to weigh pluses and minuses, in case of introduction of new currency system.

 

 

 

 

List of bibliographies:

1.     http://www.forbes.ru/mneniya-column/makroekonomika/236618-kak-zolotoi-standart-okazalsya-na-svalke-istorii;

2.     http://xn--80ahcnbhkpdfs1a.xn--p1ai/investing/gold-invest.html.