UDC 621.17
E.V. Abramchenko, V.S. Gribakin, G.P. Kolesnik.
Interference Immunity
Increasing In Digital Measuring Devices
The possibility of the measuring process
automation is discussed, considering simultaneous increasing of the interference
immunity and the accuracy of a digital measuring device in high currents
switching and interference conditions due to the strong electromagnetic fields.
Keywords: measuring device, interference,
electromagnetic compatibility, electrical machine, electronics, frequency.
Electromagnetic
compatibility problems are very important for high current electromagnetic
power converters (e.g. electrical machines), their research and testing.
According to the standard ГОСТ 7217-2003 «Rotating
electrical machines, synchronous motors. Test methods», during the testing of
an induction machine the slip value must be estimated using the formula:
where
Usually
it is recommended to estimate the slip by one of the following means:
1) Stroboscopic
analysis. The motor shaft is marked according to the number of ports. When the
shaft is lighted with a strobe light plugged in the same power grid as the
tested machine, the time, in which specified number of marks passes the fixed
indicator, is calculated.
2) Using an inductive
coil. The coil is placed at the motor’s end, where the needle of galvanometer
oscillates the most. After that the number of oscillations during the specified
period of time is calculated.
3) Using the rotor
current frequency. The shunt connected with millivolt meter (with a permanent-magnet
metering system, i.e. the zero mark is at the center of the gauge) is placed in
the wound rotor circuit. The slip S is calculated using the formula:
where N is the number of marks passed by the
needle or the number of full needle oscillations (N = 10 - 20); T is the test
duration in seconds;
The standard also allows the slip estimation using the measuring devices
for a shaft rotation frequency and the slip measurement, which have error less
than 5%. The additional load of these devices must be less than 1% of the output
power. If needed, the measured slip values could be reduced to the stator coil
working temperature with the formula: [1]
where
Analyzing the slip measurement methods given above it is seen that these
realizations make the measuring of the slip value of an induction motor possible
with 5% error, though it is open to question. An additional point is that the
automation of the measurement process remains to be implemented as it is only
can be done by using devices based on (1).
The solution is really simple at a first sight – to design a
microcontroller-based device (with a frequencies to time periods transition).
However, in a test lab different experiments are conducted at the same time,
with a currents switching and electromagnetic field interference; thus it could
be difficult to measure the slip with precision.
The problem can be solved if a designed device will have high
interference immunity (i.e. multiple integrating) and required measurement
tolerances. For that it is necessary to estimate the error of slip measurement
of an automated device based on (1).
Using
the typical procedure of inferential measurement, next formula is obtained:
where
It is important to note that usually synchronous generators and
induction generators supply power for induction motors.
Formula (2) can be reconstructed using slip equation:
It is known that nominal slip values for motors built in Russia are
estimated with accuracy from 1 to 10 percent, so (3) will be:
In this
manner, if it is needed to measure the slip S with
Let us
remark here that a measuring device has to be able to measure the slip in
synchronous machines with different rotary frequencies - 3000, 1500, 1000, 750,
600 and 500 rpm (according to the number of ports р = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6).
Hence
this work sets the problem of designing an automated slip measurement device for
induction motors with high interference immunity and fundamental error of
measurement around 0,05 %.
This
could be solved by realization of device (Fig. 1) which meets the requirements
mentioned above. Nodes of the schematic diagram are powered by the AC power
supply connected to a phase winding of an induction motor through the transformer
T1. Next symbols are used:
1) D1 and D2 are voltage dividers;
2) CD1 and CD2 are comparison
devices (analog comparators);
3) FM1 and FM2 are frequency
multipliers with phase-locked-loop frequency control (PLL);
4) DLPF1 and DLPF2 are determined
length pulse formers;
5) BLF1 and BLF2 are balanced low-pass filters;
6) DA is difference amplifier;
7) AD is AD converter with double
(or triple or quadruple) integration;
8) S is rotation frequency sensor of
induction motor;
Fig.1.
Let’s
take a detailed look at these nodes. Microchips 1401CA1 with an open collector
(or equal LM139) can be used as the comparison devices. The mandatory
requirement is that the differential gap circuit must cover the 100-200 mV
zone; resistors which form that circuit must be precise, too (like C2-29).
The frequency
multipliers could be designed on the CD4046 microchip with a phase detector
which works on a wave surface. There are the binary counters MC14520A in the feedback
circuit of the each frequency multiplier (in the rotor circuit the CD4022 is
followed by the MC14520A). Supply frequency multiplication factor in the stator
circuit is 1024 (Area 1), thus nominal output frequency of multiplier is 51200
Hz (considering nominal supply frequency equals to 50 Hz). It is supposed that
supply frequency fluctuation is inside the ±2 Hz range. Correction circuit
(Fig. 2) between the phase detector and the voltage-controlled generator (VCG)
has the following elements: R3 = 4,3
MOhm; R4 = 330 MOhm; C2 = 2,2 µF. The rest of the elements
are: С1 = 2,3 nF ; R1 = 10 MOhm; R2 = 200 MOhm and Cф = 4,7 µF. A multiplier with discretely controlled
multiplication factor (Fig. 1, switch SB)
is used in the rotor circuit. The second electric board (not showed) enables
changing of the division factor of the frequency multiplier FM2 with the CD4022
microchip.
Fig. 2
After
experimental tests and calculations had been conducted in MATLAB, it was clear that the changing of the multiplication factor
does not require the changing of elements’ values in the correction circuit
(Tab. 1); it can be done using different timing capacitors C1 – C6 (Fig. 1)
considering the PLL astatic system stability. However, it should be noted that
by utilizing these types of microchips the theoretical test results may differ
from an actual data by about 20%.
Table 1
|
Number of pole pairs |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
Stator field nominal rotation
frequency, rpm |
3000 |
1500 |
1000 |
750 |
600 |
500 |
|
Rotor PLL frequency control
multiplication factor |
1024 |
2048 |
3072 |
4096 |
5120 |
6144 |
|
Capacities
|
С1=1500 |
С2=1160 |
С3=820 |
С4=570 |
С5=360 |
С6=330 |
The
so-called Case method is implemented in both channels after the PLL frequency
control circuit. It is based on forming and averaging a sequence of potential
pulses of multiplied frequencies
where
In our
situation, fast operating speed isn’t essential because the frequencies
For
example, a component element of one ARC filter with two operating amplifiers
can be represented by a neutral point in the passive RC circuit (Fig. 3). Other
modifications of the corresponding circuits are also possible. It is reasonable
to utilize the most common and known asymmetrical ARC component elements [2,3].
Fig. 3
Signal
sources connected to the terminals of the balanced filter (dashed and solid
lines represent different connection types) represent next active signals:
1)
2)
3)
Under the
operating conditions of the symmetrical ARC circuit component it is considered
that all signals mentioned above effect simultaneously. That is why the
configuration of the passive RC circuit will be determined by the type of
signal source in the same transfer function calculation. In this way,
properties of this transfer functions will depend on sources that represent
friendly and interfering signals.
A symmetrical ARC circuit component (Fig. 3)
voltage transfer, an interference voltage suppression in the operating
amplifier supply circuit or a reduction of supply voltage ripples in the input
signal are all connected with the transfer function:
where
A stability of the considered circuit should
be estimated using sensitivity functions and disturbing factors. The sensitivity
of the transfer function (4) concerning
Additives
(5) represent sensitivities of each asymmetrical ARC circuit component
concerning
where
Let us
remark here that determined length pulse formers in both channels consist of
two circuit components: a circuit component of a pulse former (CD4098B
microchip or similar can be used) and a circuit component of an integral key (HI401
or similar). Such configuration helps to avoid instability in electrical levels
of logical zeroes and ones in the output voltages of CD4098B like microchips.
Now, the
subtractor (based of OP-07 microchip) represents a common formula for an AD
converter with the push-pull integration:
where
For
even stronger suppression of AC line and multiple frequencies, the voltage
divider D2 and the frequency multiplier FM1 can be used to form a clocking rate
of the AD converter. The clocking rate can change according to
Proposed
device might use only one adjustable resistor in BLF1 (or BLF2) feedback circuit.
In that case, balanced low-pass filters can be based on OP-37 microchips.
Experiments
showed that test device had 0.06% instrument error when the AD converter was
based on the IL 7107 N microchip and the DKS 40 was used as a rotary encoder. As
an alternative to the DKS 40, an opto-isolator could be used for cheapening and
enhancement of the device. In that case motor shaft needs one mark regardless
of its power or size.
A
natural application of a proposed device is a RPM percent indicator; it would lack
the nonlinear conversion response error while working in the heavy industrial
interference environment.
References
1. ГОСТ 7217-2003
«Машины электрические вращающиеся. Двигатели асинхронные. Методы испытаний».
ИПК, издательство стандартов, 2003. 39 с.
2. Грибакин В.С., Грибакин А.С., Колесник Г.П.,
Колесник П.Г. Синтез помехоустойчивых активных RC-звеньев с изменяемой частотой настройки для
медицинской аппаратуры. В кн.: Физика и радиоэлектроника в медицине и экологии.
Доклады V МНТК ФРЭМЭ 2004, Владимир. - 2004. - с. 222-225.
3. Грибакин В.С., Грибакин А.С., Колесник Г.П.
Точность метода вольтметра-амперметра при наличии в каналах напряжения и тока
селективных устройств. Проектирование и технология электронных средств. №4,
2004 г. - с. 26-29.
4. Грибакин В.С., Грибакин А.С., Колесник Г.П.
Реализация активного полосового фильтра с изменяемой частотой настройки. В кн.:
Физика и радиоэлектроника в медицине и экологии. Доклады V МНТК ФРЭМЭ 2002, Владимир. 2002. - с. 140-143.
5. Колесник Г.П. и др. Канал обработки информации при
измерении электрической емкости конденсаторов. Проектирование и технология
электронных средств. №1, 2007 г. - с. 71-74.
Аннотация
Рассматривается
возможность автоматизации измерения при одновременном повышении
помехоустойчивости и точности цифрового измерительного устройства, работающего
в условиях коммутаций больших токов и помех, обусловленных сильными
электромагнитными полями.
Keywords: измерительное устройство, помехи,
электромагнитная совместимость, электродвигатель, электроника, частота.