(7) Клиническая медицина

O.A. Neprelyuk, S.I. Zhadko, P.N. Kolbasin, O.L. Irza, T.P. Sataieva
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry (Head - prof. Zhadko SI)
 
Crimean Medical State University,  Simferopol.
Cymorphological indices in patients  with peptic ulcer and  duodenal ulcer after installation of dental implants.


         Recent studies have shown that intraosseous implantation does not always provide stable and guaranteed results. Analysis of the literature showed that remaining  insufficiently  in studied issues  was related to the development of early infectious complications in periimplantational soft tissues and their effect on the dates of the beginning of prosthetics, especially in patients with background somatic pathology. In recent years, to study the soft tissues of the oral cavity in dynamics  the dentists use laboratory cytomorphometrical method by taking print from the gums. Clinical research methods, based on use of hygiene and periodontal indices, in spite of widespread use, are, to some extent, subjective, and give only a qualitative assessment of tissue structures. Thus, the purpose of this study was cytomorphometrical  monitoring  of periodontal cellular elements after implantation in orthopedic patients suffering from peptic ulcer and  duodenal ulcer.

This method is based on research tsitomorfometricheskogo prints with gum (a technique developed by ZNIIS under the leadership of A. Grigoryan).
Biopsy was performed at 1, 3, 6, 12 months after prosthesis by smear-print from the gums, taken from the lingual or buccal surface by fitting it to the neck of the implant (zone interface), the employee base for the prosthesis. The prints were taken from the gingival sulcus of periimplantational area after 4 (±1) hours after brushing.
Each glass was covered with prints made from the region of 1-4 implants for 3-4 indentation in each quadrant. The glass was dried and stained by the method of Romanovsky-Giemsa. Further cytologic preparations were examined under a microscope. A review on large fields cell count was performed in 2 major cell populations and cytograms: epithelial and connective tissue (neutrophils).
 
Field selection  was  arbitrary, but they must be at least 3. In each selected field of view it was counted the total number of epithelial cells (varying degrees of maturity) and the number of neutrophils. It is noted that in the gingival impressions has normally present neutrophil cells, but inflammatory processes in the proportion of epithelial cells and connective tissue changes sharply upward connective tissue. To display the index of periodontal destruction we proposed to count the number of epithelial cells (regardless of their degree of maturity) and the number of neutrophils in the field of view.

Next, it was calculating the index periodontal destruction (SPD) by the formula:
          
IAP = (e1/n1) + (e2/n2) + (e3/n3)

Where E - the total number of epithelial cells in the field of view,

 n - the number of neutrophils in the field of view,

  1,2,3 - field of view Index of periodontal destruction expressed in convoluted units (conv)

The average values of the index periodontal destruction:

If the state standards - SDI = 12.09 - 15.03

With weakly expressed inflammation - SDI = 15.04 - 22.05

With moderate inflammation - IAP = 22.06 and>

The method was tested in a survey of 87 patients (37 women and 50 men) aged 21-64 years. By selecting patients, we considered the general condition of the deferred and related diseases, anatomical and physiological condition of the oral cavity. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 1-st group consisted of orthopedic patients without somatic diseases - 20 patients; in the 2 - orthopedic patients with somatic pathology (peptic ulcer and duodenal ulcer) - 27 patients and 3 group consisted of 25 patients requiring orthopedic care and with background somatic pathology, which in the first 30 days after implantation through day were introduced immunomodulator "Erbisol" 1 ml. In addition, we examined 15 healthy individuals (normal), not in need of prosthetics – as the control group. Orthopaedic treatment was carried out by two-stage implantation technique endosseous screw implants "Wimple". The study we have used the drug "Erbisol - immunomodulator, reparants, adaptogen. By 1 month after implantation, with statistically significant (p <0,01-0,001) growth index of periodontal destruction in all the groups studied. In the next 3 months after installation of implants in group 1 cases (orthopedic patients without somatic pathology) index periodontal destruction is practically no different from the figure of 1 month and amounted to 16,35±0,21 conv, which was 38% (p<0.01) above the benchmarks (Table 1). A somewhat different pattern was observed in patients of 2 and 3 groups (orthopedic patients with concomitant somatic diseases, gastric ulcer and 12 duodenal ulcer), where the index periodontal destruction increases relative to controls at 53.4% (p<0,01) and amounted to 18,55±0,45 conv the second group and 39.2% (p <0,001) in Group 3, and amounted to 16,84±0,31 conv. By 6 months after implantation in orthopedic patients with periodontal destruction index declined, acquired in relation to the control of unreliable (p> 0.05) in this case, with respect to 1 month after implantation, it decreased by 16,8%, which was of a statistically meaningful (p2<0,05). By this time observing patients of group 2, despite the slight decrease in the index of periodontal destruction, remained at a fairly high level and amounted to 15,82±0,34 conv, which was above 30,0% (p<0,01) benchmarks. By that time observations in patients 3 groups (orthopedic patients with somatic pathology, which after implantation applied immunomodulator "Erbisol" index of periodontal destruction decreased and amounted to 13,82 0,42 conv gaining relative to control unreliable (p>0,05), with ratio to 1 month after implantation the performance index periodontal destruction became statistically significant (P2 <0,05).

In the remote periods of observations, by 1 year, the performance index of periodontal destruction in 1 and 3 groups did not differ from controls and patients of group 2 were close to reference data.

 

 

 

 

 

О.А.Непрелюк, С.И. Жадько, П.Н.Колбасин, О.Л.Ирза, Сатаева Т.П.

Сотрудники кафеды ортопедической стоматологии

 (зав.- проф. С. И. Жадько)

 Крымского государственного медицинского университета

им. С.И. Георгиевского, г.Симферополь.

 

Просьба высылать сборник

На имя Колбасина П.Н.

КГМУ

Бул. Ленина 5/7

Г. Симферополь

АР Крым

95006