ê.ô.í., Èáðàãèìîâà Æ.À., Ðóñàêîâà Ì. Àëèàêáàðîâà Ê.Í.

 

Þæíî-Êàçàõñòàíñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèé èíñòèòóò , Êàçàõñòàí

 

Bulding  English vocabulary through the wev

 

This article presents several strategies that use free digital tools and Internet resources to engage students in vocabulary learning. The strategies are designed to support the teaching of words and word learning strategies, promote students’ strategic use of on-demand web-based vocabulary tools, and increase students’ volume of reading and incidental word learning.

An eVoc strategy is an electronic or technology-based strategy that teachers can use to develop students’ vocabulary learning and interest in words.

The term eVoc is used both to highlight that the strategies rely on digital tools and resources and to suggest the evoking of learning potential that is possible when technology and media are part of the instructional mix.

Even within our increasingly visual world, words remain our primary means of communication. To understand a text, one must understand the words that represent the ideas or concepts. Studies confirm the high correlation (0.6 to 0.8) between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension (Baumann, 2004). There are degrees of word knowledge, from “I’ve never heard this word before,” to “I know this word and can apply it in multiple contexts” (Lubliner & Scott, 2008), as well as metacognitive knowledge about how to apply prior knowledge and strategies to vocabulary learning [1].

Of particular concern to educators is the development of academic language. Although students learn oral language that enables them to speak to one another fairly easily, learning academic language is more complex because it involves abstract literacy tasks and language not customarily used in oral speech. Academic language is a second language, because all literate people must learn it to enable them to access academic content.

Teaching words, morphology, and word origins is an important component in any vocabulary learning program. It is also necessary to provide multiple exposures to the word in different contexts and to teach word learning strategies, such as using context clues, cognate information, and deciding when a word is important to know and remember. Although teaching can make a real difference in vocabulary learning, explicit teaching of vocabulary is not enough; a dedicated teacher can teach perhaps 300-400 words per year [1].

Direct vocabulary instruction is essential, but students with well-developed vocabulary learn many more words indirectly through reading than from instruction. Directly teaching vocabulary and word learning strategies is an important research-based principle that applies across the board, otherwise, promoting a lively interest in words through student expression and participation in a learning community that enjoys playing with words, builds on individual interests as well as curriculum needs, and emphasizes self-efficacy in word learning.

Despite the ubiquity of technology and media recommended to use to solve the problem of English vocabulary building, in our opinion, there are 2 groups of eVoc strategies, that when used flexibly in response to students’ varied needs and interests can and should be part of the solution to the vocabulary gap.

The first group of eVoc strategies focuses on explicit teaching of vocabulary and helping students become independent word learners.

The second group of eVoc strategies highlights online tools that provide just-in-time support while reading. Students can develop their strategic learning repertoire as they customize their own collection of supports.

Among the eVoc strategies of the first group it is necessary to single out Wordle – word mapping tools that support visual representation. By means of this technology tool students have opportunity to learn from visual displays of word relationships within text.

Wordle is a free Web application that allows students to create a word cloud based on the frequency of words in a particular text. It can be used to stimulate students’ thinking about the meaning, importance, and relationship of words as they analyze, create, and publish Wordles. To create a word cloud, students paste text into the applet and then manipulate the visual display by selecting the color scheme, layout, and font. Word clouds can be used to highlight keywords and themes to prepare students for reading, as well as prompt discussion after reading.

For some students, the creative design aspect serves as the hook to engage them in meaning making; for others, it is the words themselves that entice them to explore meanings and relationships. Although Wordles can be published to the public gallery and printed, another option is to use a screen capture program to save the Wordle as an image, creating a bank of images on your desktop or school server. They can then be inserted into a document, PowerPoint, class blog, or other text.

Among the eVoc strategies of the second group, which develop strategic digital readers with “on-demand” vocabulary help, free online vocabulary game - Free Rice - is of great interest. Free Rice has attracted millions of users, young and old. This strategy combines vocabulary learning and social service.

Free Rice presents a word and four answer choices on the screen. For each correct answer, the United Nations World Food Programme donates 10 grains of rice to countries in need. The game adjusts its difficulty level based on the response, filling a bowl with rice as the player adds to his or her score. As a class activity, the teacher could project the website on screen and guide students in playing the game for 5 minutes daily, discussing choices (e.g., “I think it must be “x” because “y””) and strategies (e.g., “Any words we can eliminate? Does the root word give us a clue we can use?”). Students can play individually or with a partner, reporting back to class on their rice earnings and sharing intriguing new words.

Reading widely and deeply is important for vocabulary development and reading comprehension. One more excellent eVoc strategy is expanding wide reading and incidental word learning with digital texts.

Class libraries, read-alouds, book clubs, and independent reading time during the education process can increase the amount and variety of student reading. However, it is challenging to find the resources and time required to provide up-to-date material, to be responsive to students' interests, and to accommodate readers at different reading levels. Teachers can dramatically expand text options for students by including reading on the Internet and other digital texts. A high percentage of students already use the Internet for homework; we can extend their learning and exploration of words in context as they read and view varied text genres on the Internet, or read texts downloaded onto a class computer, an e-book reading device, or a smartphone.

Many educational publishers and organizations provide free online content, including articles and media about current events, some of which are generated by students themselves. They are as follows:

Weekly Reader

Îøèáêà! Íåäîïóñòèìûé îáúåêò ãèïåðññûëêè.

Science News for Kids

For example, a screen displaying a book that the class is reading, such as Kate DiCamillo’s The Tale of Despereaux, links to several screens, one featuring her website and online interviews, another to a site with video clips from The Tale of Despereaux movie, and still another highlighting other fantasy books and comics. The splash screens can be printed out to build a wall mural that students expand as they continue reading.

To recapitulate it all it is essential to add that eVoc strategies use technology to support the wide reading, direct instruction, active learning, and interest in words that are essential to vocabulary development. In a digital world, knowing how to use the tools and resources available online is part of becoming a strategic learner and a technical competent teacher.

Referens:

1.Dalton, B. and Grisham, D. L. (2011), eVoc Strategies: 10 Ways to Use Technology to Build Vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 64: 306–317. doi: 10.1598/RT.64.5.1