Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè / 1. Äèñòàíöèîííîå
îáðàçîâàíèå
Agadzhanova R. M.
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, Ukraine
It is generally acknowledged that examinations are a very common
assessment and evaluation tool in universities and there are many types of
examination questions. Today universities across the world are increasingly
integrating technology into the classroom. As a result, some
exams can be conducted in a secure online environment in a proctored computer
lab or assigned as paper based or online “take home” exams. Thus, it is
interesting to analyze the peculiarities of online testing to highlight the
advantages of this tool. Moreover, this article contains a brief description of
different types of examination questions used for online testing in language
courses.
To begin with, let us consider the
peculiarities of the examination questions which are used for online tests in
language courses.
Multiple
choice questions are composed of one question (stem) with
multiple possible answers (choices), including the correct answer and several
incorrect answers (distractors). Typically, students select the correct answer
by circling the associated number or letter, or filling in the associated
circle on the machine-readable response sheet. Students can generally respond
to these questions quite quickly. As a result, they are often used to test
student’s knowledge of a broad range of content. Creating these questions can
be time-consuming because it is often difficult to generate several plausible
distractors. However, they can be marked very quickly.
True/false
questions are only composed of a statement. Students respond to the
questions by indicating whether the statement is true or false. Like multiple
choice questions, true/false questions are most often used to assess
familiarity with course content and to check for popular misconceptions; allow
students to respond quickly so exams can use a large number of them to test
knowledge of a broad range of content; are easy and quick to grade but time-consuming
to create. True/false questions provide students with a 50% chance of guessing
the right answer. For this reason, multiple choice questions are often used
instead of true/false questions. It is possible to increase the usefulness of
true/false questions by asking students to correct false statements [1].
Students respond to matching questions by pairing each of a set of stems (e.g., definitions)
with one of the choices provided on the exam. These questions are often used to
assess recognition and recall and so are most often used in courses where
acquisition of detailed knowledge is an important goal. They are generally
quick and easy to create and mark, but students require more time to respond to
these questions than a similar number of multiple choice or true/false items.
Short
answer questions are typically composed of a brief prompt
that demands a written answer that varies in length from one or two words to a
few sentences. They are most often used to test basic knowledge of key facts
and terms. Alternatively, this could be written as a fill-in-the-blank short
answer question. Short answer questions can also be used to test higher
thinking skills, including analysis or
evaluation. Short answer questions have many advantages. Many instructors
report that they are relatively easy to construct and can be constructed faster
than multiple choice questions. Unlike matching, true/false, and multiple
choice questions, short answer questions make it difficult for students to
guess the answer. Short answer questions provide students with more flexibility
to explain their understanding and demonstrate creativity than they would have
with multiple choice questions. When using short answer questions to test
student knowledge of definitions it is necessary to have a mix of questions,
some that supply the term and require the students to provide the definition,
and other questions that supply the definition and require that students
provide the term. The latter sort of questions can be structured as
fill-in-the-blank questions. This mix of formats will better test student
knowledge because it does not rely solely on recognition or recall of the term
[1].
Essay questions
provide a complex prompt that requires written responses, which can vary in
length from a couple of paragraphs to many pages. Like short answer questions,
they provide students with an opportunity to explain their understanding and
demonstrate creativity, but make it hard for students to arrive at an
acceptable answer by bluffing. They can be constructed reasonably quickly and
easily but marking these questions can be time-consuming and grader agreement
can be difficult.
Essay questions differ from short answer
questions in that the essay questions are less structured. This openness allows
students to demonstrate that they can integrate the course material in creative
ways. As a result, essays are a favoured approach to test higher levels of
cognition including analysis, synthesis and evaluation. However, the
requirement that the students provide most of the structure increases the
amount of work required to respond effectively. Students often take longer to
compose a five paragraph essay than they would take to compose five one
paragraph answers to short answer questions. This increased workload limits the
number of essay questions that can be posed on a single exam and thus can
restrict the overall scope of an exam to a few topics or areas. To ensure that
this does not cause students to panic or blank out, it is necessary to give the
option of answering one of two or more questions and distribute possible essay
questions before the exam and make your marking criteria slightly stricter.
This gives all students an equal chance to prepare and should improve the
quality of the answers – and the quality of learning – without making the exam
any easier.
Oral
examinations allow students to respond directly to the
instructor’s questions and/or to present prepared statements. These exams are
especially popular in language courses that demand ‘speaking’ but they can be
used to assess understanding in almost any course by following the guidelines
for the composition of short answer questions. Some of the principle advantages
to oral exams are that they provide nearly immediate feedback and so allow the
student to learn as they are tested. There are two main drawbacks to oral
exams: the amount of time required and the problem of record-keeping. Oral
exams typically take at least ten to fifteen minutes per student, even for a
midterm exam. As a result, they are rarely used for large classes. Furthermore,
unlike written exams, oral exams do not automatically generate a written
record. To ensure that students have access to written feedback, it is
recommended that instructors take notes during oral exams using a rubric and/or
checklist and provide a photocopy of the notes to the students [1].
In many departments, oral exams are rare.
Students may have difficulty adapting to this new style of assessment. In this
situation, it is possible to make the oral exam optional. While it can take
more time to prepare two tests, having both options allows students to choose
the one which suits them and their learning style best.
As nowadays students may protest showing up to class to take a quiz or a
test, it is possible to deliver assessments online at the students’
convenience. Let us consider the tools which are necessary for the teachers to
best serve the needs of a diverse group of students as the use of these tools
reshape teaching practices.
There are some definite advantages to online testing.
·
Although creating online tests is
labor-intensive, once a test is developed, it is relatively easy to transfer it
and repeat it in other courses.
·
Online tests are asynchronous and
can be accessed on a variety of devices. If students buy the Blackboard mobile
app, they can even take a test from their Smartphone. The flexibility offered
by online testing can be a great solution for learners with busy schedules or
when unexpected class cancellations occur.
·
While it is hard to prevent
cheating, Blackboard tests do offer many settings for instructors to randomize
questions, impose time limits, and restrict attempts.
·
Testing in an online environment can
be a lot more interactive than traditional paper and pen tests. Instructors can
embed multimedia in test questions to provide more engaging assessments.
·
For objective question types like
multiple-choice, Blackboard will automatically grade student responses, saving
time for the instructor and providing more immediate feedback to students.
·
Online tests can be more accessible
to students with disabilities who have assistive technologies built into their
computers than hand written tests are [2].
Here are some practical tips for applying online tests in language
courses.
·
It is necessary to introduce online
tests (and any other new learning technologies in general) to students early in
the semester to reduce technical issues and build desired study habits.
·
Using online tests as ungraded
practice tests will provide a useful self-check tool for students and greatly
reduce concerns about cheating.
·
Another way to avoid the cheating
issue is to design online tests to be open book assessments with a time limit.
·
Online tests can address student
demands for exam study guides. It is possible to provide students with an
online practice test a few days before a traditional exam.
·
If students are struggling with a
particular concept and a need for formative assessment occurs, online quizzes can
be applied as a just in time assessment to help identify areas where extra
practice is needed.
·
Using online pre- and post- tests is
a way to measure student learning over the course of a curricular unit. This
approach is especially useful for competency-based learning models that focus
on mastery of skills over time spent on learning [2].
To sum up, it is
recommended that instructors take into consideration all peculiarities of
creating and using online tests to ensure positive results. Students are
already using online tools as study aids for their courses. Instructors can
better serve students by providing them with custom-made study aids like online
practice tests, rather than entrusting students to rely on outside resources
that may not be valid sources of information.
References:
1. Exam questions:
types, characteristics, and suggestions [Electronic
version] / – On line – https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/teaching-resources/teaching-tips/developing-assignments/exams/questions-types-characteristics-suggestions
2. Advantages and disadvantages of online testing [Electronic
version] / – On line –http://wp.lasalle.edu/blog/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-online-testing/