Ýêîíîìè÷åñêèå íàóêè/ 14.Ýêîíîìè÷åñêàÿ òåîðèÿ
Teleuova A.B.
Karaganda Economic University of Kazpotrebsoyuz, the Republic of
Kazakhstan
THE ROLE OF HUMAN CAPITAL IN ENSURING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
ECONOMY
In
modern conditions been renewed interest of researchers to the problems of
sustainable balanced development of social and economic systems, including at
the international level. For example, there was the international conference
"Rio + 20" in 2012, where the world's attention was again focused on
the problems of activating the factors that contribute to sustainable
development. The emphasis was first placed on issues related to human capital
in the context of sustainable development (report, "Modernization and
development of human potential"). Quality of human capital is a key factor
in the competitiveness of the Republic of Kazakhstan, so the aspects that are
related to human capital, formed the basis for one of the priorities of the
country's main strategic document of the country "Strategy
Kazakhstan-2050".
In
the sustainable balanced development of the basis is to ensure stability of the
country. Modern processes of globalization, increased competition between
countries contributed to the increasing disparities and contradictions in the
development. Objective differences of human, natural and economic resources of
the territories contribute to further strengthening of economic and social
inequality of the world population.
Therefore,
the problem arises of sustainable balanced development of the country and its
regions, and it requires an objective evaluation of the existing parameters of
sustainability.
Historically,
the concept of "sustainable development" is related to the
environment. Canadian Commission for Environmental suggested one of the first
definitions of sustainable development in 1915. Thus, according to the
Commission, each generation can dispose of a certain amount of natural resources
and natural capital, but it must be remembered that the majority of these
resources must remain intact and passed on to future generations.
In
1960-1970 years of the study of this issue led to the realization that
environmental and socio-economic problems threaten the lives of present and
future generations, and at this time the idea of sustainable human development
(the concept of sustainable development) began to develop.
The
main problems that characterize the state of the global system as unstable,
they include:
1. Environmental problems: the degradation of the components of the
environment due to human activities that have exceeded all limits. Under the
degradation we understand pollution hydrosphere, atmosphere and lithosphere;
reduction in the diversity of flora and fauna; desertification; depletion of
the ozone layer; genetic diseases and abnormalities; the emergence of new
diseases; depletion of natural resources of the planet, etc.
2. Social issues: population growth in countries with low living standards;
increase disparities in living standards; increased incidence; increase in the
number of poor people; spread hunger; inter-ethnic and inter-ethnic conflicts,
etc.
3. Economic problems: the world's only priority is cash enrichment and
growth of economic profit excluding the impact on the environment and the
interests of future generations; inefficient use of resource-saving
technologies; increase disparities in socio-economic development of countries;
the absence of criteria for assessing the admissibility of the impact on the
environment, etc. [1].
With
the knowledge of these and other problems of the theory of sustainable balanced
development is becoming increasingly popular.
At
the international level also occurs in stages awareness of the need to change
the vector of development. For example, in 1962 the United Nations General
Assembly adopted a resolution entitled "Economic development and
environmental protection." 10 years after, in 1972, the Stockholm
Conference on the environment - it was the first global meeting to discuss
environmental issues - brought together representatives of 113 countries in the
world and came to the conclusion about the need for organizations to implement
the UN’s programme to protect the environment.
Then,
in 1983 on the initiative of the Secretary-General of the UN International
Commission appears on Environment and Development (WCED). Headed by Gro Harlem
Brundtland Commission - Prime Minister of Norway (the commission also called
Brundtland Commission). The main objective of the WCED was to identify
environmental and socio-economic concerns of the population around the world.
After four years of operation, the report "Our Common Future", the
Commission has sounded a warning of a change in business activity and lifestyle
of mankind; otherwise there will be a sharp deterioration of the natural
environment that promises to mankind enormous problems. Economy, according to
WCED must meet the needs and desires of the people, but its growth is expected
to fit into the ecological and resource potential of the planet.
Therefore,
the main appeal of the Commission is in transition towards a new, safe for the
environment, the era of economic development. And in this case raises the
question of the transition to a sustainable balanced development of the
"natural environment - society - people", so the concept of
sustainable socio-economic development was the basis for the Commission's
activities [2].
For
the first time the concept of sustainable development was formulated in Rio de
Janeiro in 1992, when it was approved an action plan for sustainable
development and formulate solutions to environmental, social and economic
problems facing humanity.
The
concept of "sustainable development" is based on two approaches. In
the first approach - biosphere centric - the environment and the biosphere are
considered not only as a source of resources, but also as the basis of all life
on Earth. The second approach - anthropocentric - based on the possibility of
further existence of mankind and solving problems of growing human needs for
natural resources [3].
As
there are many definitions of the term "sustainable balanced
development", we can distinguish a number of factors affecting the
sustainable development.
As
world practice shows, sustainable economic development is not possible without
the multiplication of human capital as a key factor in ensuring sustainable
development.
The
development of the leading countries of the world led to the formation of
post-industrial, and then the new economy based on knowledge and innovation.
The basis of this new economy is human capital, which is the basis of
socio-economic development of modern society.
Thereby
ensuring sustainable socio-economic development of the country, overcoming the
crisis in the economy is only possible on the basis of activation of this
factor in the development, human capital quality.
The
global market for human capital is a reality in today's economy, which is based
on knowledge. It represents an integral part of the global market, which
determines the dynamics of the movement of skilled labor. The effectiveness of
economic development is largely determined by the accumulated and implemented
in the country human capital. In modern conditions knowledge and skills are
important factors in economic growth and social progress of society. The main
wealth of any society is composed of people, so the question of studying the
problems of efficiency of fixed productive forces is important. The productive
forces are realized in the form of human capital. Human capital in the XXI
century is of paramount importance in any macroeconomic conditions. Human
capital is becoming more powerful driving force for economic growth, efficiency
and competitiveness of the national economy, making it one of the most
important factors of national security and prosperity of the country, the
welfare of every citizen.
Importance
of human capital in the modernization of all aspects of social life is steadily
increasing. According to World Bank estimates that in developed countries, 64%
of the national wealth belongs to human capital, 16% - physical and only 20% -
the commodity factor [4].
In
the Address to the Nation "Kazakhstan's way - 2050: The overarching goal,
common interests, common future" President of Kazakhstan Nursultan
Nazarbayev emphasizes the need to improve the quality of life for all people of
Kazakhstan. Identified seven priority areas of the country, the implementation
of which will allow Kazakhstan to enter the top 30 most developed countries of
the world, the President of one of the long-term priorities called human
capital development of the nation: "Developed country in the twenty-first
century - is active, educated and healthy citizens" [5].
The
problem of the essence of human capital and its role in the production always
interested economists. The first attempt to estimate human capital carried out
one of the founders of Western political economy, William Petty in
"Political Arithmetic" (1690). Even then, he estimated human capital
above the real; in fact, he was the first economist, who proved that the main
wealth is the population.
At
the teachings of Adam Smith can be found further development of ideas Petty.
According to Smith, people are naturally have differences, and this is how he
felt, is the dignity of people. Education and training contribute to the
development of these abilities. People will get the most revenue, to correctly
understand its purpose and become an expert in that area. At the same time, producing
a certain type of product, a person at the same time needs other products to
meet their needs. The right to exchange acts as a way to enable the
development. The exchange is based on the division of labor, which are the
basis for investments in human, through which it is able to develop and improve
their comparative advantages [6, p. 118].
After
about a hundred years to this issue asked German statistician Erich Engel and
English economist Jack Nicholson, and later the issue considered the founder of
the Cambridge school of political economy Alfred Marshall.
As
an independent current theory of human capital was formed in the early 60-ies
of XX century and has been appreciated by the scientific community. For his
contribution to the development of human capital theory Theodore Schultz (1979)
and Gary Becker (1992) were awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics.
At the initial stage
of formation of human capital theory has made a huge role Theodore Schultz,
first defined human capital as a productive factor and defining it as the main
engine and the foundation of economic development. On the example of the US
economy Theodore Schultz showed that return on investment in human capital is
higher than investment in physical. By investing in human capital, he refers
not only to the cost of education in secondary and higher education, but also
the cost of self-education, increased experience on the job, as well as in
health, education and science. The most important factors of economic
transformation and modernization of economic institutions Schultz called the
investment in human capital and increase the value of human labor. Therefore,
it is important to invest in the development of health, education and science,
as investment in human capital, in his opinion, contribute to the accumulation
of abilities to work, to maintain health, improve the efficiency of society [7].
Gary Becker is the
founder of the modern theory of human capital. Working at Columbia University,
in 1964 he released his famous study "The
human capital". He was the first who spoke about the
human capital of an enterprise, that is, moved it to the micro level. In the
human capital of the individual he singled out the knowledge, motivation and
production skills. Becker estimated the cost-effectiveness of education for the
employee. According to him, the increase in investment in
education and training of future professionals will make a profit no less than
investments in machinery [8].
Many
people believe that the introduction of the concept of "human
capital" was the concept that unfolded economic thinking in the direction
of the person. But this is not true.
The
concept of human capital has been entered in the 70-ies of XX century by
economists of the Chicago school. Currently, human capital is seen as a vital
resource, which even more valuable than natural resources. According to the
American researcher Jackson Grayson, competitiveness, efficiency, economic
growth systems at different levels are determined primarily by the presence of
human capital, rather than tangible assets in the form of equipment and
inventory [9].
Human
capital has become a subject of research for many foreign scientists (J.
Mintzer., B. Weisbrod, M. Friedman, T. Davenport, S. Bowles, Blaug M. Bowen,
W., L. Hansen, T. Schultz, Becker and G. many others).
Kazakh
researchers also not spared the theory of human capital. Problems associated
with the formation, development, use, evaluation of human capital, discussed in
detail in the works of S. Satubaldina, A.G. Mukhamedzhanova, K.S. Mukhtarova,
E.S. Detkovskoy, A.K. Koshanova, M.K. Medelhanova and others who have made an
outstanding contribution to the study of human resources.
In
the works of these researchers formulated the theoretical and methodological
foundations of the theory of human capital, as well as the proven positive
effect of education, knowledge, health, skills and standards of living in the
economic development of society.
Despite
the development of human capital theory, many scientists give different
definitions of human capital.
Mukhamedzhanova
A.G. gives the following definition of human capital in her work "Human
capital of Kazakhstan: formation, condition, use":
·
Firstly, human capital is the
self-expansion of human capabilities, allowing you to capture more value than
was originally advanced in person;
·
Secondly, human capital is the
category of social reproduction, having a cyclic form;
·
Thirdly, human capital is the
objective economic relation, is central to the system of economic relations of
society, influencing the pace and direction of technological progress, the
efficiency of the production and reproduction process, and is the leading
factor of economic growth [10].
Academician
A.K. Koshanov defines two approaches to the study of human capital, "a
narrow understanding of its essence as the cost of funds, including wages,
investment in human capital, and more expanded definition of this concept with
the many economic, social aspects. These differences are due to different
approaches to the definition of the category of "human capital",
which the structure is educational, intellectual, scientific, entrepreneurial
potential that is rich in content "[11].
An
extended treatment of the concept of "human capital" suggests
Professor M.K. Meldahanova. Human capital is defined as the set of accumulated
knowledge, education, and professional human resources that will improve the
productivity of labor in industrial and innovative development of the country
and the impact of costs and investments in human capital, to ensure competitiveness
and sustainability of the national economy to achieve a high quality of life
[12].
Tsyrenova
A.A. notes that human knowledge, talents, skills and abilities should be
recognized as a special form of capital on the basis that:
·
they are an integral part of each
individual's personal property;
·
they require for their formation
from both the individual and of the whole society significant costs;
·
they tend to accumulate and
represent a certain stock;
·
they contribute to the capacity of
income support human capital in the long term by eliminating the portion of the
current consumption [13].
This
interpretation is entirely economic, and all the knowledge and expertise
possessed by man, considered in terms of material resources.
Thus,
the essence of the theory is the treatment of the costs of education and health
as an investment cost, the object of which acts as the formation of human
capital. Acquisition of skills and knowledge, capacity building, formation of
motivation, health promotion can be seen as an increase in the volume of the
stock of human capital (resources).
Educations,
health, employment in the global practice are essential in determining the
quality of the human capital of the nation of a country. Among the CIS
countries Kazakhstan is the best result for the development of human capital
index, calculated by the World Economic Forum - 45th positions out of 122
countries in the world. For comparison, Russia has 51 seats, 63 lines Ukraine,
Azerbaijan on 64 of the world ranking position. The top ten rankings included
countries such as Switzerland, Finland, Singapore, the Netherlands, Sweden,
Germany, Norway, United Kingdom, Denmark and Canada [14].
In
the short term Kazakhstan has all opportunities to significantly improve the
rate.
Over
the years of independence, Kazakhstan has implemented a number of economic and
social reforms, as a result of the country displayed on the leading positions
in the CIS, including the standard of living of the population, the economy is
becoming more socially oriented. The challenges now are of a higher order:
adoption of healthy lifestyles and the development of medicine, increasing life
expectancy. President gives clear indicators of realizing the potential of
Kazakhstan. There are five:
1)
high-quality education system;
2)
The health of the nation;
3)
development of all kazakh culture;
4)
review of the social package for civil servants;
5)
the increased attention paid to citizens with disabilities [15].
At
a time when the world has entered a post-industrial era of the formation and
development of "smart" economy, human capital is a strategic resource
of the country, the quality of which in terms of intelligence, education and
skills plays a leading role in the creation of a competitive economy. The population
is a carrier of a particular capital, human, which is an essential component of
national wealth, hence the formation of public policy development of human
capital should be seen as a factor in strengthening the economic stability of
the country. This greatly changes the nature of competition in world markets
and determines the country's place in the international division of labor.
References:
1.
Zubarevich NV Socio-economic
development of regions: Myths and Realities alignment // Magazine SPERO. - 2008.
- ¹9. - P. 7-22.
2.
Ivanov VA Methodological basis for
sustainable development of regional socio-ecological and economic systems //
Economic and social changes: facts, trends and outlook. - 2008. - ¹2. - S.
50-59.
3.
Milanov EV Indicators of sustainable
development and improve the quality of life of the population (the experience
of the Fund "Sustainable development") // [electronic resource]. URL:
http://municipal-sd.ru/pdf-files/8-1/milanova-8-1-indikatory.pdf.
4.
World
Development Report 1997. The State in a Changing World [World Bank]. — N.Y.,
Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997, June. - 226 p.
5.
Message from the President of
Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev to the people of Kazakhstan "Kazakhstan's
way - 2050: The overarching goal, common interests, common future" from
January 17, 2014
6.
Nureyev R.M. Development of human
capital as a real alternative raw specialization of the country // Economic
Journal of the Rostov State University. - 2007. - ¹3. - S. 111-129.
7.
Shultz T. Human Capital in the
International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. – N.Y., 1968, vol. 6.
8.
Becker, Gary S. Human Capital. –
N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1964.
9.
Novikov V.I. Human capital in
Russia: Realities and Prospects // World and politics. - 2012. - ¹6.
[Electronic resource]. URL:http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/mir-i-politika/m6-2012/14910-chelovecheskiy-kapital-v-rossii-realii-i-perspektivy.html
10.
Mukhamedzhanova A.G. Human capital
of Kazakhstan: the formation, the state use. - Almaty: SIC Gylym, 2001. - 376s.
11.
Koshanov A.K. Human capital as a
factor of forced industrialization of the economy of Kazakhstan // Formation
and development of competitive human capital in Kazakhstan: a collection of
materials of the International scientific-practical conference / ed. O.Sabdena
and NK Nurlanovoy. - Almaty Institute of Economics SC MES RK, 2010. - s.40-45
12.
Meldahanova M.K. The modern concept
of human capital in economic theory // Formation and development of competitive
human capital in Kazakhstan: a collection of materials of the International
scientific-practical conference / ed. O.Sabdena and NK Nurlanovoy. - Almaty
Institute of Economics SC MES RK, 2010. - s.49-53
13.
Tsyrenova AA Development of human
capital in terms of the institutional environment's transformation. - Ulan-Ude:
Publishing ESSTU, 2006. - 166 p.
14.
Website of the World Economic Forum:
http://www.weforum.org