Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè/5. Ñîâðåìåííûå ìåòîäû ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ
Shevchenko M.V.
National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”,
Ukraine
Metacognition
in Teaching English for Specific Purposes
The
lack of time for in-depth study of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) is an
ongoing issue at technical faculties, where the English lessons are often
conducted once a week. Hence, students need to have some aids in order to
achieve great results in language learning. One of such helpful means is metacognition,
and more specifically, development of students’ metacognitive skills.
The
notion “metacognition” was created by
J.H. Flavell in 1979. It is defined as the process of developing
self-awareness, the ability of self-assessment, and self-regulation that
includes knowledge, experiences, aims, and strategies, i.e. the ability to arrange
your own, out-of-the-classroom learning, for example, of a foreign language: to
plan, track accomplishments, and correct mistakes when needed; the ability to ponder on one’s own work,
as well as contemplate about one’s education and learning [3, p. 3; 4; 5,
p. 54; 6; 7, p. 114]. While developing students’ metacognitive
skills, teachers help them comprehend how they study, their strengths,
weaknesses and needs, and to better perceive the process of study [5, p. 54].
Older students, who have well developed metacognitive skills, are more
motivated and interested in learning English, able to think critically and make
decisions better, show good skills of solving problems. Many researches have
proved that students with inadequate metacognitive skills perform at foreign
language lessons worse than those with highly-developed skills [7, p.114].
There
are two features of metacognition: reflection – contemplating about what one
knows; and self-regulation – control of how one studies [2, p. 158].
Examples
of questions asked by lecturers to galvanize metacognitive skills of technical
students, who study some professionally-oriented concepts at the ESP lessons, may
be the following: Why are we studying
this topic?; What have we learnt about it at this lesson?; How can the studied
concept be applied to your speciality / future profession?
Metacognition,
motivation and behaviour are reckoned to be elements of self-regulated
learning. Self-regulated learners eagerly search for needed information and
make everything possible to master it; perform educational activities confidently,
with meticulousness and creativity; are aware of possessing particular
knowledge or a skill and when they do not; manage to overcome obstacles;
control the efficiency of their learning approaches and tactics; take
amenability for their accomplishment outcomes; consider study as a systematic
and controllable process.
Among
approaches of self-regulated learning are self-assessment, organization and alteration,
setting aim and planning, looking for information, making notes, self-control, arranging
the environment, rehearsing and memorizing, looking for social aid, as well as reviewing
[3, p. 5; 9].
Students’
metacognitive skills include [5, p. 55]:
1.
Setting learning goals (enumeration
of their individual aims for participation in the English classes, as well as
their review and update throughout the programme; listing activities that will
help them achieve these purposes; developing and practicing skills essential for
achieving the above-mentioned goals; acknowledging achievements on the way to
meeting the aims; explore, determine and evolve new strategies and additional
educational opportunities to reach the English language learning goals);
2.
Comprehension of personal learning styles (voice likes and dislikes concerning in-class
exercises, as well as approaches to study, i.e. preferred ways to take in and
process the taught material; individual assessment of one’s own learning styles
and inclinations, strengths and weaknesses; share and clarify learning predilections
and learning tactics to group-mates and the teacher);
3.
Assessment of individual learning
(control, evaluate and characterize the improvement; identify reached aims and
define following steps; show comprehension of assessment; look for additional
learning chances; study autonomously of group activities or teacher instructions).
There are numerous benefits of application of
metacognition to teaching English for Specific Purposes [1, p. 36-37; 3, p. 7-8; 8]:
· Students’ learning is enhanced, and pace of progress, the quality and
speed of their cognitive engagement become faster;
· Students become confident in their abilities to learn, turn into
strategic learners, better critical thinkers, decision-makers, problem-solvers,
and, in addition, are not anxious to ask for help with study when needed;
· Students get clearer understanding of how to apply new concepts and professional
terminology to the “living” foreign language;
· Students’ motivation, self-assurance and sense of personal amenability for
their own development are increased;
· Students adjust their learning tactics to match the task or changing
circumstances;
· Students can accurately assess
why they are successful learners or, vice versa, analyse inaccuracies when they
fail to perform a task;
· Students’ thinking skills are developed, understanding of their learning
processes and knowledge construction are promoted;
· The quality of study is enhanced due to active engagement in contemplating
about the subject-matter of the lesson;
· Students with advanced metacognitive skills have higher levels of inherent
aiming, task value, use elaboration learning schemes, think critically, conduct
metacognitive self-regulation and effort control;
· Most importantly, students see themselves as continual learners and as
those who can successfully handle new, harder tasks.
To
summarize, it should be mentioned that developed metacognitive skills help students
improve greatly, among others, their listening and speaking skills, which
require good understanding of the concept or process related to their
speciality that is studied at the English for Special Purposes lesson, and stay
constantly motivated and engrossed in learning the foreign language.
References:
1. Coşkun, A. (2010). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on
the Listening Performance of Beginner Students. Novitas-ROYAL (Research
on Youth and Language). 4 (1), 35-50.
2. Darling-Hammond, L., et. al. (2013). Session 9. Thinking about
Thinking: Metacognition. Retrieved from:
http://www.learner.org/courses/learningclassroom/support/09_metacog.pdf. Last
accessed 27th April 2015.
3. Dawson, T. L. (2008). Metacognition and Learning in Adulthood. Retrieved from:
https://dts.lectica.org/PDF/Metacognition.pdf. Last accessed 27th April 2015.
4. Merriam-Webster. (2015). Metacognition. Retrieved from:
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/metacognition. Last accessed 27th April 2015.
5. Metacognitive Skills. (2006). Retrieved from: http://www.dllr.state.md.us/gedmd/cs/eslcsmeta.pdf.
Last accessed 27th April 2015.
6. NRC (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and
School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 384.
7. Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting Student Metacognition. CBE—Life
Sciences Education. 11 (1), 113-120.
8. Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive Knowledge and Language Learning. Applied
Linguistics. 19, 515-37.
9. Zimmerman, B.
J. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational
Psychologist. 25(1), 3-17