Philosophical sciences/2. Social philosophy
Popov V.V., Musica
O.A.
Doctor philosophy,
Doctor philosophy,
Rostov State
University of Economics (RINH), Taganrog Institute named A. P. Chekhov
(branch), Taganrog, Russia
TO THE QUESTION OF
THE PRESENT IN HISTORICAL PROCESS
Idea of a bezdlitelnost of the present forced many thinkers to refuse to
historical reality true life. Actually, any historical process while it exists,
exists in the present. And though the concrete historical objects filling
historical reality can't exist infinitely long, they don't come from the future
now and aren't removed in the past, and arise and cease to exist the movement
of historical reality resulting in the present. From the future arise and not
objects and processes of historical reality, but only their states consign to
the past. The concept "state" can be defined as qualitative and
quantitative definiteness of life of historical objects and processes. Owing to
a hierarchical multilevelness of the historical world and historical objects
each object is characterized by a peculiar system of the states possessing
different degree of stability, thus the steadiest is the state connected with
qualitative definiteness of historical object. Change of this state means loss
by object of the qualitative definiteness and the existence termination. But
also in this case the object doesn't consign to the past, it remains in
directly current present, and remains in the form of some remains, results of
destruction, etc.
Change of conditions of objects and processes is a current of historical
time. It is possible to tell that arise from the future and various conditions
of objects and processes of historical reality whereas the reality is in
eternally lasting present consign to the past. This objectively real event,
actual existence of the historical world, its objects, processes and events. As
from the future arise and not objects, and only their states consign to the
past, in historically real time there is no past and future time, and there is
only continuously lasting present. To imagine past future tense, it is
necessary to possess memory and imagination.
The historical thought in 19 - 20 centuries
gets the powerful philosophical and methodological basis in "person"
of panlogizm, the principle of identity of the spirit and the world excluding
any doubts in possibility of cognoscibility of history. Therefore other
direction in philosophy of history which purpose is transition from descriptive
historical activity to historical research of scientific and rational type is
formed.
The researcher of historical process
structures, systematizes object of the research, trying to find the adequate
conceptual and methodological bases for its understanding. At such approach
borders of sciences extend, and there is a modern search of theoretical
reference points.
The appeal of scientists to creation of exact
models of the description allows to use means of modern symbolical logic for
the solution of many conceptual problems. So far already there are various
logical concepts considering problems of designing of historical process, a
historical event, historical time, historical change, etc.
Defining within the approach of the relation
chosen by us, structural elements of historical reality, we inevitably use the
category "process" used in various meanings. According to it it is
necessary to allocate and define some main types of process in research of
logic-methodological aspects of philosophy of history:
-
Process as sequence of stages, only elements,
the moments in emergence, development and disappearance of an event. It is
microprocess (owing to definition of the event) or configurativity process.
-
The situational process understood as
consecutive change of events in the fixed situational interval. It is
"molecularity" process of historical research.
-
Macroprocess – process as consecutive change
of situations in the fixed macrointerval of historical reality.
-
The "generalizing" process which
represents the historical totality revealing as infinite change of
macrointervals.
In social philosophy the hierarchy of types of
processes is represented important in methodological aspect as assumes creation
of "a rational framework" of historical descriptions. Within various
directions of the modern theory of processes possibly specification of basic
elements of historical designing. So, the concept "process" is
already beyond the sphere of the past and the present and speaks in the future.
In this connection consider quasiprocess within which it is possible to
consider the movement of history from an actual situation in some world to a
set of "the possible worlds" in the future. Therefore attribute of
quasiprocess is the movement in the casual direction (without sharing thus the
category "accident" and "opportunity"). Quasiprocess is
considered, for example, by Resher in the context of the general understanding
of process set by it as "linear discrete sequence of indexed elementary
processes. Discretization assumes entered by it quasi - the moments
"birth" and "death" of process.
Fundamental nature of the concept
"historical process" causes complexity of its philosophical
treatment. As the philosophy history, the appeal to problems of process and
time, its intensive reflection testifies, is characteristic for transitional
eras. It is absolutely natural as during such eras it is unique various types
of mentality, attitude and outlook coexist. Possibility of existence among
various worlds allows the person to feel on own experience that human language
calls time. The transition period which as if unites already lost
universalization of the past and creation of a universalization of the future,
reveals before the person as space of its own problems in the conditions of
globalization.
Literature
1. V.V. Popov, O.A.
Musica. Time and social synergetrics. – Rostov-on-Don, 2007. - 256 p.