Akhatov U.A. Candidate of law sciences, associate professor
SEMBAY D. undergraduate
student
Ibragimov O.
undergraduate student
Al-Farabi Kazakh National
University
T.Ryskulov about the nature and value of the policy
pursued by the tsarist Russia
At the beginning of the ÕÕ century Turkistan
territory was subordinate land
of the
Russian empire. This was
a very difficult time when Turkistan people
suffered from national inequalities
and injustice. Sacred
concepts like «Freedom»,
«equality», «liberty» were not
actual at that time.
After
conquering Kazakhstan and
Central Asia (Òurkistan), tsar administration began to strengthen
colonial politics . Local people
representatives had no right to
be engaged in political power or management .
In order to cultivate colonized lands and suppress political-social confrontation, Russian empire
began to settle Russian peasants and Russian-kazak troops to the Turkistan area. Settlers were placed to
the fertile lands of local people, but
unfortunately
old residents
were dislocated to a very uncomfortable places with unfavorable weather conditions
: mountainous areas, desserts. Only between 1906 and 1915 tsar power
has taken 2462265 tithe land from
Kazakh people inhabiting Zhetisu
and Syrdaria regions and distributed to Russian settlers [1]. Colonizers tried much
to turn this «...into real Russian land
[2] . In 1917 the
head of provisional government
A.F. Kerensky said
to Russian muslim people : «... you should treat colonized
men like English and French people
did [3].
The tsar power
conducted colonial policy openly without disguising. It didn’t take into account
national, ethnical peculiarities
of local people, their ways
of living and traditions, national culture , they considered
them to be slaves and did their best
to forget language, national conscious, forced them to be christians. General mayor of the Turkistan territory N. A. Kuropatkin wrote in his diary:
«
we whole 50 years deprived outsiders
of development, education and from Russian life , mainly of progressive culture»
[4]. Missioners like
Ostroumov and Lykoshin spent their
whole life to christen and make Russian muslim people. They considered
Russian settlers to be higher in all respects than local Kazakhs and fomented hatred between them.
In their opinion local
people were illiterate, wild,
worthless . The worst thing
which brought colonizers to the area
was alcoholism . For example, in Aulie ata uyezd (larger administrative district,
200 Russian inhabitants of the
Michailovka village drunk 5000 buckets
or 50000 litres vodka in 1913 [5]. Drunk Russian peasants
considered themselves more cultural than local people.
The imperial
power also introduced administrative police system in the Turkistan territory: general – governor – regional governor – uyezd ( territorial area executives. Only Russians were appointed to
these high positions, as for local people, they “held” lower positions
: bolys (chief of small rural district), kazy( muslim
judge. Administration branch
had social disease: bribery, abuse
of authority. Simple people had to pay huge taxes. «Russian officials here
(in Kazakhstan and Turkistan) criticised local people concerning their
knowledge, respected values, always carried out the policy of
making them Russian,-
wrote with anger A. Bokeikhanov [6]. So, the beginning of the ÕÕ
century showed rotting of both colonial yoke and crises of tsar regime. The tsar regime was in crisis. Rebellion appeared everywhere.
Turar
Ryskulov’s childhood and youth
years were the years of hard time, when yoke and hardships suppressed simple people.
T.
Ryskulov was born in 1894, 26 th of December in the Zhetisu region, Verny uyezd eastern Talgar bolys in the family of
nomad peasant who fought
for freedom, liberty and equality. His father Ryskul
Zhylkaydaruly couldn’t bear
tsar administration regime, who
lived in Syrdaria region, Chernyev uyezd in 80-s of
the Õ²Õ century settled to Tulkibas
region. In a new place he again suffered from
injustice and in December 1904 he shot
local chief of small rural district and was exiled to Siberia [7]. Deprived of his father’s support, but with the help of relatives 1907
he enters Russian primary school
and finishes with honors. Such kind of mixed schools pursued missioner
purpose. When he was in prison
with his father in Verny city, prison
supervisor Prikhodko tried to make
young Turar christian
[8], at Merke
school teachers also forced him to
cross himself.
In 1910. Turar was admitted to the 1-st level agricultural school and in October 1914 he finished it
and got a specialty of a gardener. In school-leaving certificate he had excellent marks. He
witnessed injustice, violence,
inequality, humiliation from very childhood.
When he was to finish school, he wrote request application to the
headmaster in Russian and one can admire
his natural ability and
diligence : « I could study
better, I know I am capable, but human experiences good and
bad moments in his life, because of hard times I couldn’t master what I
wanted, didn’t get enough knowledge,
but due to my stubbornness
I
started to study better from the III
form» [9]. Further, he wrote that he was deprived of support, as far as
father was in prison, he had to help his mother about housework
and there left little time for doing lessons,
but thanks to education he
became strong and would like to continue it if possible. Besides
this application in archive documents one can see Turar’s control works on mathematics and
Russian literature.
His request was
satisfied, he got a pass to specialized agricultural school, but school
headmaster didn’t accept him and said: «kazakh – nomad, he
doesn’t need knowledge to
cultivate land» [10]. Distressed
about this in 1915
Turar tried to
enter newly opened pedagogical institute
in Tashkent, but they refused to admit him, they
considered him «illiterate». Finally, he complains
education ministry gets permission to
pass exam and enters the institute [11]. In order to
survive, he works as a gardener in
Krasnovodsk fieldship near Tashkent city.
Being a student, he participated in
nation-liberation, revolutionary movements, secretly attended and took active part in political circles, thoroughly researched
political literature. Diligent
and industrious from very childhood he clearly
understood that the path to gain
independence and freedom will be very hard.
In summer 1916 nation- liberation rebellion against tsar administration took place in Kazakh steppe. This battle was natural result of the tsar administration’s colonial policy. The Tsar
ukase of June 25 to gather and hire rough workers to the rebel was only pretext
to start rebellion[12]. The charter was announced on the 8thof July. Having suspected that he might be in that list and witnessing rebels in the
Tashkent city, T. Ryskulov left
institute and went to Merke
village of the Aulie ata
uyesd ( large administrative- territorial unit) [13].
The tsar administration considered outsider
to be obliging, easy-going
«free» labour force compared with Russian
workers. They quickly started to
gather workers from Turkistan territory, because they were
sure local people would do
nothing against «Russian weapon» [14], - remembers T.Ryskulov in his work
about the history of the rebellion.
People expressed dissatisfaction
everywhere.
General-
governor N.A. Kuropatkin divided at his
discretion 220000 people from Turkistan
territory for the rough work in
the following way by regions: Syrdaria region - 60000, Samarkand – 32407, Fergana
– 51233, Zhetisu – 43000 and Sakaspi – 13830. In order to protect interests of
the «Cotton growers» he reduced the number of people
from Samarkand and
Syrdaria to 40000,
instead of them he ordered to
hire additional workers from non
cotton growing areas [15]. That is why the rebelion covered nomad
regions and was of severe
character.
It
was supposed they should hire
22675 workers from
Aulie ata uyezd. According to the instructions they were to release from rear works: bolys, ñvillage administration staff, low police officials from
outsiders, mosque staff, mosque pupils (they got religious education), middle
level and using noble
name outsiders, respected citizens
from wealthy families and those who used the rank of a respected citizen.
Under the leadership of
the Aulie ata
uyezd executive colonel Suplatov they
started to gather workers from the regions. People were very angry and furious of
this fact, they didn’t approve the tsar
administration acts, so they decided to arm themselves and fight against it.
Turkistan general-governor announced
military situation in the territory. Rebellion was
very severe. Kazakh troops
attacked villages settled by Russians, armed confrontations accelerated. Shocked by this situation the
head of the uyezd distributed
arms to Russian peasants.
When Ò.Ryskulov came
back to Merke, people fought openly and armed
confrontations reached its peak. There were many victims as far as people were not properly armed and they showed unorganized
actions. T. Ryskulov had
incredible organizing and leading qualities
and soon local people trusted him
much and asked him to lead them
in the political battle against
injustice. Having noticed that
rebels often confront with
punitive brigade of the
tsar administration, he called people
to be organized, advised
them not to deal with
small groups, not to fight
with simple Russian peasants, just to
express dissatisfaction to the tsar administration. “What I worried much, - wrote T. Ryskulov in his diary,
that the tsar authority would provoke Russian peasants to
attack Kazakh troops and they
would suffer much [16].
He
condemned the war between imperialist countries,
conducted meetings in places where
there were many rebels, explained unfairness of this battle, revealed the policy
of tsar authority and of local executives, recommended to be very cautious from
provocations. He highly appreciated
rebel actions, where people’s
hero Akkos Kosanuli was the
leader, he said it was well organized and gave him
political advice.
When the rebel
had reached its peak in
Merke, the tsar authority arrested him, but not having found any guilt, had to release him, but prohibits him not to deal with political
activity. After release from the
prison, he was ill about
one month and couldn’t
help rebels. At this time the
tsar authority suppressed rebels
in most places, repressed people
started to punish them severely. Local police having noticed, that T. Ryskulov again
participates in political struggle, decided to search him, so Turar
had secretly escape to Òashkent.
Nation-
liberation movement of 1916 showed all secrets of bitter existence, he
worried much about the
future of his people and he
firmly decided to devote
all his life to nation liberation struggle.
So,
his main objective was to
research social-political,
economic situation of his colonized
people, to understand deeply
the essence of colonial policy of the tsar authority.
Temporary
government established after February revolution which overthrew Russian tsar authority in 1917,
commissioned to rule temporary Turkistan territory to the Turkistan
committee formed April 6. The members of the committee were: N.N. Shepkin (chairperson), A. Bokeikhanov, M. Tynyshpayev, S.
Maksutov, V.S. Elpatevskyi, A. L. Lipovskyi, P.I. Preobrajensksy, Î.À.Shkapsky
and A. Dauletshin. Later
the list was supplemented with new names. The temporary government inherited from the tsar authority how to humiliate , cheat and yoke simple, unprotected people used false slogans, promised unbelievable things. The
Turkistan Committee didn’t make any changes into territory management
system, just did insignificant works. For example, to the
Syrdaria region military governor
post,it appointed previous uyesd executive lieutenant colonel Trizna as a new regional commissar. Mainly previous tsar officials and judge
staff were approved as uyezd
commissars. In mountainous areas and villages
the power was in the hands of
bolys executives and elders. Nevertheless, some members of the Turkistan
committee, personally: A. Bokeikhanov, Ì.Òynyshpayev and Î. Shkapsky did much work in 1916 to improve the life of repressed
people.
The relation between
Ò. Ryskulov
and Turkistan Committee should be considered very
attentively. We couldn’t find any documents which shows this relationship in archive materials, those found indirect
documents are not base to express real opinion about
those events. It should be summarized in the following way: In summer 1917 T. Ryskulov established contact with local
nation representatives, they trusted him much and they decided to appoint him the leader of the Syrdaria region. Later
he left the mentioned Committee and joined Bolsheviks
and it has many
objective reasons, one of them – the Turkistan Committee was unable to solve
political, social- economic crisis, national problems of the territory. Ò. Ryskulov understood clearly the nature of
the Temporary Government and it
wouldn’t bring freedom and equality to his people.
He fought
for people’s freedom and in spring 1917 he returned to Merke
and formed « Revolutionary
Union of the Kazakh Youth». He wrote about it: «The reason of our organizing this Union is that Kazakh people suffered much from 1916 nation-liberation movement, later from kulaks (wealthy Russians) and Kazakh youth needed
organization which would put
them on right revolutionary path, so we
formed « Revolutionary Union of
the Kazakh Youth». The members of the Union were those who took
an active part in 1916
nation-liberation movement, has
revolutionary vision, well
up in politics 30 Kazakh, Tatar and Russian young people and
their political leader was T.Ryskulov.
They made contact with revolutionary intended
soldiers of the Aulie Ata garrison and
Merke military division. Bolsheviks ( soldiers against tsar
army) had great influence on this garrison. « At that time, -
says T. Ryskulov, the representative of
Tashkent council, one Bolshevik
visited Merke and
explained bolshevik’s programs and
objectives , the reason of their
struggle. So, in 1917 we were close to bolshevik idea». T. Ryskulov contacted with the
well-known bolsheviks of the Aulie-Ata uyezd: N.I. Chernyshev,S.K.
Khmelevsky, Fedorov- Savadsky and with their
substantial help, conducted
revolutional propoganda work among Kazakh workers. «Revolutionary Union of the
Kazakh Youth» was different among the
same organizations formed in the territory of Turkistan and Kazakhstan, because this
Union had special programs and charter, clearly defined their aims of
struggle. « At that period
there were not many certain revolutionary parties and the strive
and trying of Kazakh youth to join on
the base of those programs was real
advancement», - pointed out T. Ryskulov. It is
seen from the program and charter that
the Union members clearly understood
the character, meaning and social difference of the February revolution. The "Union» members criticized Russian colonists and local executives for their deeds against
local people and protected
interests and expectations of simple people and stated
their purpose: «... We chose the way to fight against violence
and injustice of Temporary
government’s local committees
and Russian kulaks». The "Union» program openly condemned that the
February revolution was really unable to eliminate social injustice and national yoke, on the contrary, local dominating class
representatives were in concert with colonizers oppressed simple people. « Revolutionary Union of the Kazakh Turkistan Youth» was political
well up school for T. Ryskulov. In summer 1917 Turkistan territory council
of Kazakh deputies was formed in Tashkent. One
of the council leaders was T. Ryskulov. That year August 30, peasant and kazakh deputy councils joined together and
formed central executive
committee. The members of
the mentioned committee were
6 Russians and 6
Kazakhs, one of them was
N.Ryskulov.
In September 1917
Ò.Ryskulov became the member
of RSDRP. The main reason of his joining
authoritative bolshevik party: he
really believed in bolshevik programs
and ideas, he thought this is
the only and right way which will bring his people their dreamed freedom and equality and besides his environment forwarded him to join
this party without any doubt. We know, that he couldn’t join political «Àlash
Orda» movement, of course,
there were some reasons, mainly: being
very distant, as far as
political centre of the movement situated in
Orynbor city and Arka area
which were too far from the place where T. Ryskulov worked ( Turkistan
territory), the movement
functioned improperly in southern
regions, T. Ryskulov didn’t have
enough political experience,
finally, his social view point
differed much from «Àlash
Orda» members. All these facilitated him to
join bolshevik’s political party.
References:
1. Àrtykbayev
Zh.Î. The history of Kazakhstan : Textbook . Astana: 1994. P.84 2. Ryskulov T.
Revolution and indigenous people of Turkestan (Collection of the major
articles, reports, speeches and theses). Part-1. Tashkent,
"Uzgosizdat", 1925.
3. Konyratbayev O. Turar Ryskulov.
Almaty. "Kazakhstan", 1994, pp.119-120 .
4. Mynbayev
D.", Requirement born on helter-skelter move of fate ". "Orken" 20 of April, 1991
5. Kamzabekula D. Ìelody of People.
"Culture" ¹14, 16-31 of July, 1992
6. O. Konyratbayev. T. Ryskulov “People’s congress" newspaper, 14th December, 1994. Almaty. "Kazakhstan" 1994., p.157
7. Mekhov
V.I. Turar Ryskulovich
Ryskulov// CPSU history questions.
8. Questions of a historiography of Kazakhstan.
Alma - Ata. 1983, - page
77
9. Ryskulov T. Kazakhstan. Kyzylorda:
"Kazmembas" 1927. p.83.
10. Menitsky I.O. About character of an event of 1916 in Turkistan
11. Ryskulov T. Kirgizstan. - Moscow,
1935.
12. Abdikadirovaof KH. T.
Ryskulov in Mongolia //Madeniyet
and Turmys 1988, No. 7
13. Beysembayev S., Kulbayev S. Turar
Ryskulov. Alma-Ata, "Kazakhstan", 1974,
p.40.
14. Ryskulov T. Revolution and
indigenous people of Turkestan (Collection of the major
articles, reports, speeches and theses). Part-1. Tashkent,
"Uzgosizdat", 1925.p.3.
15. Bayzharasov R. Turar Ryskulov.//"Socialist Kazakhstan", 1960, 19
October, 3 16. Nurullin R. A. Turar Ryskulov (1894-1937).//- Called by the revolution. Biographic articles (Sost.: L.P.Zotova). Tashkent,
"Uzbekistan", 1987, pp.185-191