Pedagogical sciences
Kohan O., Vlasenko L.
National University of Food Technologies (Kiev, Ukraine)
DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE STUDENTS’
LEARNING MOTIVATION
The
essence of effective teaching lies in the ability of the teacher to set up a
learning experience that brings about the desired
educational outcomes. For this, each pupil must be
engaged in the activity of learning. The nature of the psychological state
of being engaged in the activity of learning has been the focus of much debate and
research. A number of important psychological concepts, principles and
processes involved in both the activity of learning itself
and in facilitating such activity have been
identified.
The article considers the aspects of how
pupils learn that have the most practical relevance for
effective teaching. Broadly, these fall into four sections. First, a
consideration of the psychological nature of learning as it
relates to effective teaching. What psychological state
needs to be set up by the teacher for learning to take place?
Many
writers have considered the nature of pupil learning explicitly within the
context of effective teaching and have explored four major
questions concerning the nature of pupil learning:
_
What mental processes are involved when a pupil is engaged in learning?
_
What changes occur in the pupil’s cognitive structure, which themselves
constitute the pupil learning?
_
Which psychological factors facilitate pupil
learning?
_
What are the main types of pupil learning?
Although
different theorists have elaborated their answers to some questions in different
ways, there are a number of points of convergence in
their separate approaches.
Pupil
learning can be defined as changes in a pupil’s behaviour that take place as a result
of being engaged in an educational experience. Gagné et al. (2005)
identifi ed five main types of pupil learning:
_
Verbal information: e.g. facts,
names, principles and generalisations.
_
Intellectual skills: ‘knowing
how and why’ rather than ‘knowing that’. These can be
arranged
in an increasing order of complexity, with more complex intellectual skills being
built upon the simpler ones.
_
Cognitive strategies: ways in
which the pupil is able to control and manage the mental
processes
involved in learning, including strategies for attending, thinking, memorising and
dealing with novel problems.
_
Attitudes: an attitude may be
defined as a pupil’s feelings towards some particular
object
or idea.
_
Motor skills: e.g. playing a
musical instrument or operating a word-processor.
Motivation and reinforcement. Having considered the basic information
processing framework for the nature of pupil
learning,
two major concepts need to be related to the operation of this model: motivation
and
reinforcement.
What
motivates pupil learning? In attempting to answer this question it is important
at bear in mind a clear
distinction between learning that must take place by an individual as
a natural part of interacting with the environment, and the specifi c learning
that in intended by the teacher. Within Piaget’s
approach, learning is the inevitable consequence
of
the individual’s interaction with the environment. Such learning stems from the
individual’s biological drive towards adapting to the environment. In that
sense, any educational experience that requires pupils
to interact in some way with the learning task in hand
will result in some learning. However, when we ask ‘What motivates pupil
learning?’, we are really asking a question about the ways in which a pupil
will make a positive mental effort towards the
learning task. If pupils are asked when the
felt
most motivated towards school learning, their answers will fall into one of two main
categories: ‘When I was really interested in the work’ or ‘When I had to!’
These two categories represent one of the most
important distinctions made in considering
pupil
learning, that between ‘intrinsic motivation’ and ‘extrinsic motivation’.
Such
motivation involves an interest in the learning task itself and also
satisfaction being gained from the task. Human beings are
born with a strong desire to explore their environment and to
seek out stimulation. Almost any situation that is puzzling will
gain a person’s attention and interest. Indeed, a useful way of starting a
lesson ot present a topic in the form of a question or
problem that needs to be addressed ot elicit pupils’
interest. Whilst most analysis of intrinsic motivation has focused on the intellectual
curiosity aspect, there is another strand to the concept that often receives less
attention, but which is also important. Intrinsic motivation also includes
satisfaction from undertaking the task because one finds
engaging in the task is satisfying in some way. The
essence of intrinsic motivation is that the person fi
nds the task pleasurable and satisfying in itself.
In
contrast, extrinsic motivation refers
to those learning situations where the impetus
for
the motivation stems from the fact that successful completion of the task is a
means towards some other end. Here, the person’s
satisfaction is derived from the fact that
completing
the task leads to an end that they value and is not derived from the task itself.
If the same end could be reached by engaging in some other task more easily, the
person would happily switch tasks since it is the end that matters not the task
itself.
Clearly,
success in school learning can satisfy a whole range of needs that can form
the basis for extrinsic motivation. One prime motive for school learning is the desire
to earn status, esteem, approval and acceptance in the eyes of others. These
may be earned in the short term by means of
obtaining
good marks and teacher praise, and in the long term by entrance to degree courses
and professional occupations. Another prime motive for school learning, at least
of short-term value, is the avoidance of teacher reprimands and punishments. In both
cases, such motivation is extrinsic because it is the end state that drives the
motivation and not interest in particular learning tasks or
activities.
Although
intrinsic and extrinsic motivation are contrasted with each other, it is
important to note that most tasks involve a mix of the
two. Moreover, pupils may be high in their levels of both
intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The notions of intrinsic and extrinsic
motivation play a key part in the self-determination theory developed
by Deci and Ryan, which concerns how pupils’
thoughts about motivation and learning regulate their behaviour.
Within
this approach, Deci and Ryan attempt to identify different components (of types)
of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in order to further refine how pupil
motivation impacts on their academic behaviour.
The
view of seeing motivation as deriving from an attempt to satisfy one’s needs in very
helpful in thinking about pupil learning. A particularly interesting
development of this viewpoint is the work of Maslow (1987),
who has argued that an individual’s basic needs can be
arranged in a hierarchy, with those lower in the hierarchy being ‘pre-potent’
(that is, needing to be satisfi ed as a matter of greater priority) in relation to
needs higher in the hierarchy. Maslow’s hierarchy, starting from the lowest
level, in as follows:
_
Physiological needs: e.g. need
for food and oxygen.
_
Safety needs: e.g. need for
security, and freedom from anxiety.
_
Belongingness and love needs: the
need to feel one belongs, and the need to give and
receive
love.
_
Esteem needs: the need for
achievement, competence, mastery, and the need for
status
and prestige.
_
Need for self-actualisation: the
need to realise one’s potentiality.
As
well as basic needs, Maslow also identifies cognitive needs, based on the
impulse to satisfy curiosity, to know, to explain and to
understand. Maslow sees such cognitive needs as being
inter-related with, rather than separate from, the basic needs. Indeed, the
cognitive needs involve cognitive capacities (perceptual, intellectual and
learning), which are used in part to satisfy the basic
needs.
Maslow’s
hierarchy provides a useful framework for thinking about pupil motivation and
needs. In particular, it draws attention to the importance of making sure that
those needs lower in the hierarchy are being met when
educational experiences that draw upon the higher needs
of
esteem and self-actualisation are set up. Maslow has also discussed a related
notion of ‘peak experiences’. These refer to moments of
intense delight and ecstasy involved in being ‘at one’ with
an experience at the level of self-actualisation. Maslow has argued that
a worthy and important goal for education is to generate such peak experiences as
a result of ego-enhancing involvement and achievement in school learning.
The
notion of ‘need for achievement’ has also received
a
great deal of attention in relation to the motivation of pupils towards school
learning.
A
number of studies have explored the nature and development of both the need for
achievement in general and how it is expressed in the context of academic
success. The need for achievement appears to involve both
intrinsic
motivation, and extrinsic motivation. Research on pupils’ level of need for
achievement has highlighted how the expectations of others can influence their
aspirations and how they interpret success and failure ot
themselves.
Control
over pupil learning by a teacher is seen to depend upon the teacher arranging the
appropriate reinforcement to be contingent upon the desired pupil behaviour.
Skinner’s
work on operant conditioning of animals relied heavily on the process of ‘shaping’.
This involved reinforcing those behaviours that gradually approximated the desired
behaviour. Thus, if the desired behaviour was to jump up and touch an object, initial
rewards would follow any jumping, then only jumping near the object, and finally
only jumps that made contact with the object. The great advantage of working with
human beings, is that one can indicate to pupils in the classroom what the
desired behaviours are, and then reinforce their
occurrence.
The
behavioural approach to learning has a number of important educational
implications.
First,
it draws attention to the relationship between pupils’ behaviour and how the
consequences of the behaviour for the pupil infl uences
its future occurrence. In particular, it advocates that teachers should
make frequent use of praise to reinforce appropriate pupil behaviour.
Second,
the research has identifi ed a number of principles that can facilitate
learning, for example, the use of quick corrective
feedback. Such principles have been used to
develop
programmed learning packages, characterised by short learning steps and quick
corrective feedback. These packages are designed to ensure a high probability of
success on each step, which thus acts as reinforcement.
It
is interesting to note at this point that reinforcement can be usefully linked
to pupil motivation, since both success in learning tasks
and the behaviours used by teachers to encourage pupil
effort can constitute reinforcement. Moreover, the link between reinforcement
and pupil motivation also draws attention to the danger of
assuming that such teacher behaviours are in fact
reinforcing when the opposite may be the case. Similarly, a reprimand for a
pupil, as a form of punishment, delivered in
a context where the pupil is attention-seeking may be experienced as
a reward and act to reinforce the pupil’s misbehaviour. To avoid this danger, the
teacher needs to be sensitive to the pupil’s social context and values in
determining what actions will constitute reinforcement.
References
1. Gagné, R. M.,
Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C. and Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of Instructional Design (5th edition).
London: Wadsworth.
2. Fox, R. (2005). Teaching and Learning: Lessons from
Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Canter, L. and
Canter, M. (2001). Assertive
Discipline: Positive Behavior Management for Today’s Classroom
(3rd
edition). Bloomington, Indiana: Solution Tree.
4. Alderman, M. K.
(2008). Motivation for Achievement:
Possibilities for Teaching and Learning (3rd edition). London: Routledge.
5. Maslow, A. H.
(1987). Motivation and Personality (3rd
edition). New York: Harper Collins.