Performed by:  student of KhNUE

I.S. Sedlovskyi

Scientific director: prof. I.V. Zhuravlyova

 

One of the priorities of any business in a modern market economy is to improve working capital management. High cost and complexity of traditional methods of raising funds necessitates optimization of enterprise financial policy by means of searchig for new sources of working capital, the growth rate of their turnover .

The analysis of the dynamics of current assets and their elements led to do the conclusion, that national enterprises characterized by the tendency of increasing of receivables (see Fig. 1.1). Thus, in the period from 2005 to 2012, trade receivables of domestic enterprises increased more than in 2.5 times (from 316.956 billion. to 705.200 billion.). The share of receivables in the total current assets reached 62.3%. This situation is due to the two following reasons. Firstly, the market economy is characterized in the desire of companies to expand markets, increase sales and attract new customers.

Supplier has a conflict of interests in case of postponement: on the one hand the commercial loan promotes the growth in sales and increases profits, but on the other hand - there are a number of new problems. Rising receivables leads to "freezing" of working capital, which increases the duration of their turnover. In addition, the supplier has a "cash gaps" reduce liquidity and financial stability; he assumes the risk of default of payment, which is due to insolvency of the buyer etc. Thus, the company needs to replenish working capital, which can be achieved using the following financial instruments (see Fig.1.1)

Own funds

 

Commercial loan

 

Bank loan

 

Overdraft

 

Factoring

 
 

 

 

 

 


Fig. 1.1. Formation instruments of current assets [27, p.55]

 

 

All of the financial instruments have specifics and reasonable conditions of use. Analyzing the peculiarities of each instrument, choosing any of them should be guided by the general financial policy of the enterprise.

It should be noted that the interpretation of factoring presented in the relevant legal acts, is somewhat narrowed.

According to the "Convention on International Factoring", to which Ukraine acceded in 11.01.06, factoring involves performing at least two of the following features: credit in the form of prepays debt claims, and cash collection of debts (credit management), insurance against the credit risk.

The most common view is factoring as commission and brokering. Factoring is often determined as operations related to intermediary refusal for unpaid payment claims for goods (works, services) and, accordingly, the right to receive payment for them that is collecting receivables.

The other view interprets factoring as financial services. According to this view, factoring take a special place among the operations with financial assets, along with leasing, insurance and trust services. Also the Law of Ukraine "About Financial Services and State Regulation of Financial Services" interprets factoring as the category of financial services.

The another one view consider factoring as an activity or a complex of services, which provides specialized financial institution in exchange for the assignment of receivables.

Taking into account the provisions of the UNIDROIT Convention and the results of the analysis, factoring is defined as a financing method in which a business owner sells accounts receivable at a discount to a third-party funding source to raise capital.

In each case organization of factoring services has its own features, which depend on a number of factors that determine the type of factoring. However, the typical mechanism of factoring can be generally reduced to next. Three participants are involved in the implementation of factoring agreement:

 

the factor – intermediary (a bank, specialized financial institutions or an individual (entrepreneur));

the supplier (in the process of factoring agreement becomes a factors client);

the buyer (serves as the debtor in factoring contract).

Factoring is presented schematically in Fig. 1.2.

 

Factor

 

Buyer

 

Supplier

 
Su                                               1

 

 


                   2           3           5                                          4

 

 

Where:

1. Selling goods on deferred payment;

2. Debt rights assignment;

3. Down payment (app. 90%);

4. Delivered goods payment;

5. Fund balance payment (app. 10%).

 

 
         

        

 

 

 

                                                                                                      

Fig. 1.2. Schematically presented factoring

List of used sources

 

1.   Внукова Н. М. Можливості та ризики факторингу в ракурсі SWOT- аналізу / Н. М. Внукова, К. Шапошникова // Фінансовий ринок України. – 2007. - №2 (40). – С. 6 – 11.

2.   Внукова Н. М. Основи факторингу: навч. посіб. [для екон. та фін. вищ. навч. закл.] / Н. М. Внукова. – К.: Т-во Знання, КОО, 1998. – 174 с.

3.   Вожжов  С. Система регулювання банківської ліквідності як інструмент локалізації її надлишку / С. Вожжов // Світ фінансів. - 2008. – № 3(16). - С. 94 – 97.

4.     Все о кредитоспособности заемщика [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим  доступу: http://www. solvency. boom. ru/ 4mepthod. html.