Экономика / 9. Экономика промышленности

Yessirkepova A.M., Yessirkepova M.M., Tulebaeva A.

The South-Kazakhstan state university after named M.Auezov

 

Problem of use of secondary resources in production

 

One of the most important, from the economic point of view, properties of resources is the opportunity of their restoration, both in an environment and during a social production. The opportunity of restoration promotes decrease in limitation of a resource from the point of view of its use during a social production. In other words, one of conditions of an effective utilization and management secondary raw materials (SRM) during essential manufacture is its restoration from waste with the purpose of further use, i.e. repeated use and effective utilization SRM. But if the majority of resources of raw material during a social production as-or is used, the resource of use SRM often isn't realized. The matter is that any raw material isn't extracted with the purpose of its repeated use. Use SRM is interfered by a lot of factors. Completely to reveal these factors it is possible only in detail having analyzed structure of use and management SRM.

If to speak about most important of specified above factors it is necessary to note, that secondary use is possible not for any kind of a resource. Secondary use is possible only for such resource which waste can return initial consumer properties. The last are characterized by possible quantity of a cycle of processing more than one. It is necessary to understand the period of time as a cycle of processing from the beginning of technological processing a resource up to the end of processing of all kinds of its waste. If from waste of metal, a paper and some other kinds of raw material reception of secondary raw material with properties primary that is possible, for example, for waste of vegetative fibres and mineral power resources restoration up to initial properties is impossible for cleanly technical reasons. From the point of view of use SRM any waste, which restoration up to properties of a primary resource it is impossible, it is necessary to carry to irrevocable losses. The ashes formed at burning of fuel on fuel-energy station, can be used as fertilizer or for allocation from it any valuable elements. But for its use as fuel resource ashes are irrevocable losses. The smaller share of a resource at different stages of processing gets in irrevocable losses, a lot of cycles of processing probably for the given resource. That a lot of production probably to make from the set volume of the limited resource.

But except for presence of irrevocable losses there is still a lot of the factors interfering an opportunity of use SRM. For their structurization and estimation it is necessary to divide these lacks on a number of parameters among which as it is possible to allocate the most essential: technical, organizational, economic, etc.

Let's consider the technical factors influencing opportunities of use of secondary resources. These factors are shown at two stages: 1) during processing waste in raw material, 2) during reception from a secondary resource of finished goods. During processing waste technical difficulties can be caused by impossibility of reception from waste of a resource with primary properties. For example, from some alloys to allocate this or that making component it is impossible at the given level of technologies. Such wastes usually either destroy, or use them in other technological processes. At the second stage technical difficulties of application of a secondary resource can be caused by distinction of properties of a primary and secondary resource at its technological processing and distinction of properties of the finished goods received from different kinds of raw material. These difficulties are caused by that at the given level of development of technologies of processing of waste it is impossible to receive a secondary resource absolutely identical on properties primary. In this connection occurrence of a different sort of complexities, first, is possible at processing secondary raw material on the same process equipment, as primary raw material. Secondly, properties of the finished goods received from secondary raw material, frequently concede to properties of same production from primary raw material. For example, it is impossible to receive from paper for recycling a paper same whiteness as from wood.

Except for technical, opportunities of use of secondary resources are limited also to organizational factors. Organizational difficulties can arise at various stages of reception of secondary resources from waste. At designing manufactures of processing waste economic efficiency is frequently reached due to great volumes of the given manufacture. Instability of a situation in the market of secondary resources doesn't enable to plan volumes of processing of waste with a sufficient degree of accuracy. Besides the aspiration of the enterprise to decrease material capacity own production entails reduction of volumes of waste of the given manufacture that causes of search of waste's sources on the party. It can be realized through the organization of own procuring network or by search of suppliers of the given waste. But in connection with that the market of waste was not generated yet, their offer in the market not stably, that causes the certain difficulties in the organization of deliveries of raw material (waste) in necessary volumes.

It is possible to carry the information factor to the factors interfering use SRM. The matter is that the nomenclature of waste of industrial production and consumption too greater, and information on streams of these wastes, their properties and about presence of technologies on their processing is not enough. In this connection there is a problem of a supply with information of streams of waste in branches of economy.

At an estimation of variants of use of secondary resources ecological factors have important value. Certainly processing of waste prevents their hit in an environment. But influence of waste of technologies of processing of waste on an environment influence of primary waste is frequent appears more harmful, than. For example, the typographical paint which has been washed up from paper for recycling at its processing, renders greater influence on an environment, than paper for recycling. In this case it is more effective (from the ecological point of view) to destroy or bury the given kinds of waste. Speaking about presence of a similar sort of waste, it is necessary to consider following feature. We shall assume, that the enterprise has decided to restore properties of these waste up to initial (by a principle of use SRM). In this case homogeneous process of processing of waste (we shall conditionally name their waste of the second order) means presence of new kinds of waste (the third order) which processing causes occurrence of the next new kinds of waste. This vicious circle, basically, can proceed indefinitely. And its influence on efficiency of use of secondary resources is rather great.

But the most important in every respect are economic forces. At an economic estimation of variants use SRM there is the greatest number of contradictions. Economic difficulties can be divided conditionally on arising in manufacture and in the market (in sphere of the reference).

Economic difficulties of use SRM in sphere of manufacture are connected with necessity:

1) Additional capital investments in expansion of capacities;

2) Attraction of additional turnaround means for service of new capacities.

Both of these the factor influence cost of finished goods, that increasing its cost price that can reduce competitiveness of production of the enterprise.

It is possible to carry the following to external factors.

1. A competition in the market between primary and secondary raw material. The parity of the prices for secondary and primary raw material in the market can lower efficiency of use of secondary raw material, in comparison with use of primary raw material.

2. Instability of the offer of secondary resources in the market (in the short-term period), and jumps of the prices caused by her on resources, are the reason of growth of parameters of riskiness of investments into manufactures on processing waste. It raises requirements to efficiency of the given manufactures.

Parities of the various factors interfering opportunities of use SRM, change depending on kinds of waste, a level of technical progress, economic policy of the country (region) and a lot of other reasons. Because of it is impossible to speak unequivocally about efficiency or an inefficiency of use SRM. For its estimation it is necessary having defined a mask of effect from concrete actions in view of all complex, both factors-terminators, and the factors promoting increase of efficiency of given actions. It is necessary to develop a technique allowing most full for this purpose and objectively to estimate efficiency of processes of use SRM. On the other hand it is necessary to develop the complex mechanism of organizational-economic state stimulation of the given processes. Only on the basis of carrying out of a similar sort of actions it is possible to speak about expediency of introduction at the enterprise of processes of use SRM. 

However, at carrying out of estimation by uses and managements SRM at the industrial enterprises, it is necessary to remember, that prominent feature of considered processes is the variety of factors influencing on their efficiency (such as technical-technological, economic, etc.). In this connection, separate carrying out of the analysis and research of complexes of the technical-technological, organizational-economic and other factors influencing efficiency of considered processes is represented expedient.

 

The Literature:

 

1.     Бобылев С.Н., Ходжаев А.Ш. Экономика природопользования. М., 2007

2.     А.А.Алимбаев, Т.П.Притворова Стратегическое планирование развития региона в мировой, национальной и региональной экономических системах. Караганда, 2008 г.

3.     Тонкопий М.С. Экономика природопользования: Уч.пос. – Алматы: Экономика, 2000.-С.475