Филологические науки/1. Методика
преподавания языка и литературы
Ст.преподаватель,
Фёдорова М.Л.
Костанайский
государственный университет им.А.Байтурсынова
Methods of communicative teaching and cooperative
learning at the lessons of foreign language
Communicative language teaching (CLT) and cooperative learning (CL) share a
common characteristic: in a meaningful task students are asked to exchange
information among themselves in small groups and/or with the teacher. This kind
of student collaboration has two benefits. First, the whole class actively
participates in a task at the same time and students can then compare their
findings when the task is over; and second, the meaningful task is rehearsed in
class for later use in real communication outside the classroom. In some ELT
settings, many obstacles have deterred English teachers from using either CLT or CL
in their classes. These include large class size, lack of training in
communicative and cooperative techniques, and mistaking any group work for
communicative teaching and cooperative learning. One obstacle that most
educational establishments cannot overcome is the extensive language syllabus
prescribed by the textbook. Actually, each level of a textbook is often a set
of texts, which may include an all-in-one textbook, listening tasks, a grammar
book, and sometimes a short story book. In theory, teachers have to follow the
rationale and sequence of each chapter; but in reality, for a variety of
reasons, teachers skip items in the textbooks. If the syllabus is too long and
detailed, students’ abilities are low, or teachers have a heavy schedule of
extracurricular activities, teachers may choose only the essential tasks, that
is those that require little or no class preparation. When this happens, teachers
have little flexibility to explore the use of communicative language teaching
and cooperative learning in their classes. But it is necessary to find ways to
adapt textbooks so that classes include
more communicative and cooperative activities, especially for teachers who are
hesitant to use communicative language teaching and cooperative learning
because of textbook constraints. Even when teachers are required to have
students complete tasks in the textbook, they can successfully apply the
principles of communicative language teaching and cooperative learning.
Defining Communicative Language Teaching and
Cooperative Learning Communicative language teaching began in Britain in the
1960s, as a replacement for the earlier,
highly-structured method of situational language teaching. In this early model,
students were given a specific situation or a dilemma that they had to solve.
The given situations, more often than not, were irrelevant to the needs of
students. For example, teenage students role played as the manager and staff of
a company that was having a financial crisis. Unfortunately, many language
textbooks are still presenting this model of situational teaching. This is
because textbooks are written for a large readership in different countries
where English may be the first, second, or a foreign language. If a teacher
uses such an activity without any adaptation, English students will be
distanced from the situation because the task won’t be meaningful to them.
Communicative language teaching requires authentic communication, which
includes a believable setting, a normal speed in speaking, a range of lexical
items suitable for the students’ ages, and an overall promotion of learning. People
should learn a foreign language for performing different functions. Therefore,
it is natural to introduce authentic learning material in class. Cooperative
learning tasks go a further step by encouraging students to work together and
by promoting an equal opportunity for every student to participate in the activity.
Improving self-esteem, enjoyment of learning, and interethnic relations are key
in this approach. Cooperative learning also requires strategies for student
collaboration and attention to how strictly the teacher should structure
activities to help encourage effective cooperation. Indeed, many cooperative
learning activities combine a group component with other components in which
the teacher demonstrates and students work alone. In most cases, both communicative
language teaching and cooperative learning require teachers to provide language
support in terms of useful vocabulary and grammar so that students are able to
succeed in the task. Students will benefit more from communicative language
teaching and cooperative learning if they understand that communicating and
sharing with peers is a language learning strategy that they can apply outside
a class setting. Now everybody acknowledges the importance of such concepts stipulating
that learners should be provided with greater opportunities for purposeful
communication both inside and outside the classroom.
In the learning
process, under the conditions of a modern credit system in Kazakhstan teachers should help learners
to “learn how to learn” and think and
act independently. Teachers should bear in mind the following rules of when
they prepare for a communicative or cooperative activity:
1. The activity must be purposeful and meaningful.
Students should be given convincing reasons for doing the activity, and they
should know what they will have achieved upon completion of the activity.
2. The activity must be authentic. The items taught in
the activity must suit students’ ages, habits, and environment. Students must
be able to use the items for academic and non-academic purposes.
3. Teachers should feel free to adapt textbook
activities.
4. Mechanical
drills should not be the only activity in pair or group work.
5. A diversity of activities is needed.
It has never been suggested that a class should be
organized in cooperative groups all the time. It is impractical to think that
one or two approaches can work wonders for all students, even when they have
identical educational backgrounds. Teachers have to make changes from time to
time when delivering a lesson. Small
modifications of activities, even when teachers have to follow textbook tasks, can
easily adapt them for communicative teaching with minimal extra preparation for
themselves or their students.
References:
1.
Slavin,
R. 1995. Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.).
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
2.
Widdowson,
H. 1996. Authenticity and autonomy in ELT. ELT Journal, 50, 1, pp. 67–68.
3.
Wilkins,
D. 1972. The linguistic and situational content of the common core in a
unit/credit system. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.