Maksym Gladskyi, PhD, Kostyantin Yanko
National Technical
University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
Low-Cycle Fatigue of Titanium alloys
under Multiaxial Loading
Keywords: low-cycle fatigue, multiaxial loading, titanium alloys.
Abstract. The
results of low-cycle fatigue tests of titanium alloy under non-proportional
biaxial loading are given. The VT1-0 tests were carried out at three levels
Mises’ strain with various combinations of proportional and non-proportional
strain paths. All the tests were carried out at room temperature. Fatigue life
assessment method was proposed turned to be effective and allowed to take into
consideration such factors as strain state type, strain path type and loading
irregularity.
Introduction
There
were many attempts to develop model based on non-linear accumulation of fatigue
damages, but most of them did not consider complex influence of such factors as
type of stress state, loading path, previous stress history on the process of
fatigue damages accumulation. Fatemi and Yang [1] give a wide survey of the
existing models and offer their classification.
In
the paper it is studied influence of sequential loading effects on the titanium
alloys fatigue damage and under 90° out-of-phase non-proportional loading.
Damage model is proposed, which considers non-proportion effects, which appear
at loading regime change.
Experimental procedure
With
the purpose of getting stress-strain state close to homogeneous were used
tubular specimens with outer diameters of
Specimens
of VT1-0 were tested at constant deformation amplitude, and under
non-proportional regular loading. The VT1-0 alloy showed behaviour which is
typical for cyclic-stabilized materials under the tested loading conditions. Tests
results are showed in the Table 1, where – non-proportional
parameter of strain cycle [2].
Table 1
Path, strain peak values, non-proportional
parameter and number of cycle to failure for VT1-0 titanium alloy
path |
|
|
|
|
i |
0,55 |
0,75 |
0 |
1580 |
i |
0,72 |
0,94 |
0 |
822 |
i |
0,78 |
1,34 |
0 |
318 |
o_45 |
0,59 |
1,02 |
0,5 |
931 |
o_45 |
0,76 |
1,32 |
0,5 |
372 |
o_45 |
0,93 |
1,61 |
0,5 |
211 |
o |
0,7 |
1,21 |
1,0 |
733 |
o |
0,9 |
1,56 |
1,0 |
301 |
o |
1,1 |
1,91 |
1,0 |
199 |
For
the VT9 titanium alloy the programme of tests, given in Table 2, was carried
out. The basic modes were: tension-compression, alternating torsion and 90° out-of-phase loading. The first stage
of the programme was the block axial loading and/or torsion moment test with
given strain ranges. During this test the strain path remained constant. The
second stage of the programme was testing the specimens with changing of the
strain path. Transfer from one strain path to another was conducted during
making the value reach the 0.5
point and then the specimen was brought to failure. At the third stage the test
with a multiple strain path change was carried out.
Table 2
Strain peak values and number
of cycle to failure for VT9 titanium alloy
Test |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
cycle |
||||
a_01 |
а |
0,8 |
- |
157 |
293 |
а |
1,0 |
- |
136 |
||
a_02 |
а |
1,0 |
- |
98 |
245 |
а |
0,8 |
- |
147 |
||
a_03 |
а |
0,6-0,8- 1,0-0,8 |
- |
50 |
519 |
a_04 |
а |
1,0-0,8- 0,6-0,8 |
- |
50 |
491 |
oatota |
- |
0,8 |
1,0 |
50 |
475 |
oa |
o |
1,0 |
1,0 |
77 |
218 |
a |
1,0 |
- |
141 |
||
atat_1/5 |
a |
1,0 |
- |
40 |
423 |
t |
- |
1,0 |
130 |
||
atat_1/3 |
a |
1,0 |
- |
65 |
510 |
t |
- |
1,0 |
219 |
||
t_01 |
t |
- |
0,8-1,0- 1,2-1,0 |
50 |
601 |
t_02 |
t |
- |
1,2-1,0- 0,8-1,0 |
50 |
528 |
at |
a |
1,0 |
- |
97 |
398 |
t |
- |
1,0 |
301 |
|
|
ta |
t |
- |
1,0 |
398 |
603 |
a |
1,0 |
- |
205 |
|
|
ao |
a |
1,0 |
- |
98 |
184 |
o |
1,0 |
1,0 |
86 |
|
|
to |
t |
- |
1,0 |
282 |
390 |
o |
1,0 |
1,0 |
108 |
|
|
ot |
o |
1,0 |
1,0 |
80 |
384 |
t |
- |
1,0 |
304 |
|
Assessment Approach
The
assessment of VT1-0 titanium alloy fatigue life under non-proportional loading
showed that the application of Pysarenko-Lebedev modified criterion resulted in
good correlation of predicted and test data due to the complex consideration of
the strain state type and non-proportionality of the loading [3]. That is why
it is advised to apply the Pysarenko-Lebedev modified criterion as well as the
chosen damage accumulation hypothesis for assessing the VT9 titanium alloy
fatigue life. In the paper the two damage accumulation hypotheses were
analyzed: the linear hypothesis and the Manson’s approach, according to which
the damage curve is the relative fatigue life nonlinear function and looks like
this:
,
where
;
– the number of
one-level loading cycles;
– number of cycles
before failure under the given loading level;
– material constant
that is calculated from the test data under sequential double-level loading.
The
combined application of the Pysarenko-Lebedev modified criterion and of the
Manson’s approach showed the high level of predicted and test data correlation
for all the loading programmes except the alternating torsion. So the following
modification of the Manson’s approach is proposed:
, (1)
where ;
– strain path
orientation angle, which determines the dominating type of the
strain state;
and
are fatigue strength
coefficients at finite life
for uniaxial and
torsional loadings.
During
the alternating torsion the damage accumulation is linear, during the
tension-compression – with the application of the Manson’s approach, and during
the biaxial proportional and non-proportional loading their linear
interpolation.
The
application of formula (1) resulted in the best correlation of the best
correlation of the predicted and test data that is shown on the Fig.1.
|
Figure
1. Comparison of predicted fatigue lives by the
proposed approach with experimental fatigue lives |
References
[1] Fatemi A., Yang L. Cumulative fatigue damage and life
prediction theories: a survey of the state of the art for homogeneous materials
// Int. J. Fatigue. – 1998, vol.20, No.1, pp. 9-34.
[2] Itoh T., Sakane M., Ohnami
M., Kida S., Sosie D. F. Dislocation
Structure and Non-Proportional Hardening of Type 304 Stainless Steel // In:
Proceeding of the 5th International Conference Biaxial-Multiaxial
Fatigue and Fracture,
[3] Shukayev S., Zakhovayko O., Gladskyi
M., Panasovsky K. Estimation of low-cycle
fatigue criteria under multiaxial loading // Int. J. Reliability and life
of machines and structures. – 2004, vol.2, pp. 127-135.