Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè/ 5.Ñîâðåìåííûå ìåòîäû
ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ
Popkova Y.V.
East-Kazakhstan state technical university, Kazakhstan
SOME
MODERN ASPECTS IN TEACHING UNIVERSITY STUSENTS LISTENING AND SPEAKING
ACTIVITIES
In teaching EFL/ESL one should possess some fundamental
guidelines which will make teaching more successful and satisfying for both
students, and teachers.
Among all language skills courses in listening and
speaking skills have a prominent place in language teaching today. Our
understanding of the nature of listening and speaking has undergone
considerable changes in recent years. The teaching listening has attracted a
greater interest in recent years than it did in the past.
The notion of English as an international language has
also prompted a revision of the notion of communicative competence to include
the notion of intercultural competence. We should know what applied linguistics
research and theory says about the nature of listening and speaking skills, and
what implications for classroom teaching our methodology proposes. Listening as
comprehension is the traditional way of thinking about the nature of listening.
Indeed, in most methodology manuals listening
and listening comprehension
are synonymous. This view of listening is based on the assumption that the main
function of listening in second language learning is to facilitate understanding
of spoken discourse.
Spoken discourse has very different characteristics
from written discourse, and these differences can add a number of dimensions to
our understanding of how we process speech. For example, spoken discourse is
usually instantaneous. The listener must process it “online” and there is often
no chance to listen to it again. Spoken discourse has also been described as
having a linear structure, compared to a hierarchical structure for written
discourse.
Two different kinds of processes are involved in
understanding spoken discourse. These are often referred to as bottom-up and top-down processing.
Bottom-up
processing refers to using the incoming input as the basis for understanding
the message. Comprehension is viewed as a process of decoding.
In
teaching bottom-up processing learners
need a large vocabulary and a good working knowledge of sentence structure
to process texts bottom-up. Exercises that develop bottom-up processing help the
learner to do such things as the following:
·
Retain input while it is being
processed
·
Recognize word and clause
divisions
·
Recognize key words
·
Recognize key transitions in a
discourse
·
Recognize grammatical relationships
between key elements in sentences
·
Use stress and intonation to
identify word and sentence functions
Traditional listening focus primarily on bottom-up
processing, with exercises such as dictation, cloze listening, multiple-choice
questions after a text. They assume that everything the listener needs to
understand is contained in the input.
These example tasks for bottom-up listening skills to
do the following things:
·
Identify the referents of pronouns
in an utterance
·
Recognize the time reference of an
utterance
·
Distinguish between positive and
negative statements
·
Recognize the order in which words
occurred in an utterance
·
Identify sequence markers
·
Identify key words that occurred
in a spoken text
·
Identify which modal verbs
occurred in a spoken text
Here are some examples of listening tasks that develop
bottom-up processing:
1)Listening: Listen and complete the specification chart.
Audio-text is the following:
“This monster is one of the biggest tunnel drills in the world. It’s the
MB471/316 Tunnel Drill, and it costs more than thirty-one million dollars. It’s
twenty-four point three metres in diameter across the cutter face. It weighs
two thousand tons and moves at a massive speed of three metres pr hour. It
needs at least two hundred and thirty workers to operate and maintain it.”
|
MB471/316 Tunnel Drill Specifications |
|
|
Length |
|
|
Diameter |
|
|
Speed |
|
|
Manpower needed |
|
|
Cost |
|
2)Listening: Anna is talking about her CV. Fill in the gaps. “From 2003
until 2005, I(1)__ at Comet Electronics as a technician. I (2)____ Comet in
2005 and (3) ___a full-time student at Thames Valley University in September
2005. From 2005 to 2006, I (4) _____audio electronics at Thames Valley. In
2006, I (5) ___my Diploma in Audio Technology. Then in September 2006, I (6)
___work as an audio maintenance technician at Omega studios.”
Audio-text is the following: “From 2003 until 2005, I
worked at Comet Electronics as a technician. I left Comet in 2005 and became a
full-time student at Thames Valley University in September 2005. From 2005 to
2006, I studied audio electronics at Thames Valley. In 2006, I received my
Diploma in Audio Technology. Then in September 2006, I started work as an audio
maintenance technician at Omega studios.”
Top-down processing, on the other hand, refers to the
use of background knowledge in understanding the meaning of a message. Whereas
bottom-up processing goes from language to meaning, top-down processing goes
from meaning to language. The background knowledge required for top-down
processing may be previous knowledge about the topic of discourse, situational
or contextual knowledge. Primarily top-down processing should be taught
because it develops the learner’s ability to
do the
following:
·
Use key words to construct the
schema of a discourse
·
Infer the setting for a text
·
Infer the role of the participants
and their goals
·
Infer causes or effects
·
Infer unstated details of a
situation
·
Anticipate questions related to
the topic or situation
The following activities develop top-down listening skills are as follows:
·
Students generate a set of
questions they expect to hear about a topic, then listen to see if they are
answered.
·
Students generate a list of things
they already know about a topic and things they would like to learn more about,
then listen and compare.
·
Students read one speaker’s part
in a conversation, predict the other speaker’s part, then listen and compare.
·
Students read a list of key points
to be covered in a talk, then listen to see which ones are mentioned.
·
Students listen to part of a
story, complete the story ending, then listen and compare endings.
·
Students read news headlines,
guess what happened, then listen to the full news items and compare.
In real-world listening, both bottom-up and top-down
processing generally occur together. The extent to which one or the other
dominates depends on the listener’s familiarity with the topic and content of a
text, the density of information in a text, the text type, and the listener’s
purpose in listening.
A typical lesson in current teaching materials
involves a three-part sequence consisting of pre-listening, while-listening,
and post-listening and contains activities that link bottom-up and top-down
listening (Field, 1998). The pre-listening phase prepares students for both
top-down and bottom-up processing through activities involving activating prior
knowledge, making predictions, and reviewing key vocabulary. The
while-listening phase focuses on comprehension through exercises that require
selective listening, gist listening, sequencing, etc. The post-listening
typically involves a response to comprehension and may require students to give
opinions about a topic. However, it can also include a bottom-up focus if the
teacher and the listeners examine the texts or parts of the text in detail.
Successful listening can also be looked at in terms of
the strategies the listener uses when listening. Does the learner focus mainly
on the content of a text, or does he also consider how to listen? A focus on
how to listen raises the issues of listening strategies. They can be the ways
in which a learner approaches and manages a task, and listeners can be taught
effective ways of approaching and managing their listening. These activities
seek active listeners in the process of listening.
We believe that in contexts where comprehension and
acquisition are the goals of a listening course, a two-part strategy is
appropriate in classroom teaching and instructional materials, namely:
Phase 1: Listening as comprehension
Phase 2: Listening as acquisition
The listening texts are now used as the basis for
speaking activities, making use of noticing activities and restructuring
activities.Linking listening tasks to speaking tasks, provide opportunities for
students to notice how language is used in different communicative contexts.
Bibliography
1.
Jack C. Richards (2008). Teaching Listening
and Speaking. From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Mark Ibbotson Series Editor: Jeremy Day
(2008). Cambridge English for Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
3.
Celia
Bingham (2008). Technical English. 2 course Book. Teacher’s Book. Pearson
Education Limited.
4. Felixa Eskey
(2005). Tech Talk.Better English through Reading in Science
and Technology. The University of Michigan: The University of Michigan
Press
5. Brown, Gillian, and George Yule (1983). Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
6. Äìèòðåíêî Ò.À.
(2009). Ìåòîäèêà ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ
àíãëèéñêîãî ÿçûêà â âóçå. Ìîñêâà: Ìîñêîâñêèé ýêîíîìèêî-ëèíãâèñòè÷åñêèé
èíñòèòóò.