Ńåźö³˙ «Ō³ėīńīō³˙», ļ³äńåźö³˙
5.
Alla Aristova
a head of
department “Philosophy”
of
Social and religious processes in Ukraine
It took less than two decades for
The very fact,
that a large number of small denominations exist alongside with the several Churches
without apparent attributes of National domination makes a fertile ground for
conflicts. In fact, the extreme nature of transition society, with its social
and economic instability, anomy of social institutions, and polarization of
socium, characterized by the high degree of mass activism is turning poly-confessionality
into a powerful conflict provoking factor.
The tension vectors in
·
Long-running
and severe conflict between the Orthodox Churches (Ukrainian Orthodox Church, Ukrainian
Orthodox Church of Kyiv Patriarchate, Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church),
which has actually escalated the Ukrainian religious situation for decades
ahead.
·
Conflict
between
·
Also,
inherited from the past were the latest contradictions between the Orthodox and
Protestant Confessions. Orthodox Churches have construed the high level of the later
activities as territorial and ideological expansionism.
·
Contention
between the Orthodoxy and Muslims in the South of
·
Most
of conflicts between the traditional and non-traditional religions are of
foreign origin. Traditional Churches have perceived the neo-religions as an
alien and threatening factor which could impair their native spiritual values
and patriotic feelings, and distort national mentality.
·
Problems,
crises and splits inside of both traditional and nontraditional Churches and religions, including
those of ethnical minorities (Muslims and Jews.)
On the whole, «the Ukrainian scenario», according
to which the poly- confessionality was established demonstrated the vicious
circle effect: variety of different religions with their large number and
active competition in the process of looking for their niche in Ukraine’s
society precipitated conflicts between the Churches and inside the Churches,
which in turn, triggered the splits and fragmentation, and eventually led to
increase in the number of confessions. As of to date, there are no doubts
whatsoever, in the fact of specific nature of religious conflicts in Ukraine,
which grew to be not merely the struggle between the clans and elites of
Churches, but rather a collision of national and cultural identities, the
choice conflict of geopolitical, cultural and historical as well as civilization
frames of references.
Analysis of changes, which took place in
Ukrainian realities over the last two decades, provides all the grounds to present
a rather adequate periodization for social and religious processes.
First period comprises of 1988-1990. National
celebration of 1000 millennium of Rus’ Baptism (the year 1988) made such
multidimensional impact on political, civil, cultural, social and psychological
religious processes which was fully understood only a decade later. It was for
the first time since the Second world war that the powerful religious potential
of Ukrainian people, have been accumulating contrary to (and thanks to) the
long political ideological pressure of totalitarian system, manifested itself. Institutionalization of Ukrainian
Autocephalous Orthodox Church and Ukrainian
Greek Catholic Church (1988-1989) was the most important event at the
background of turbulent social and
religious processes including: self-organization of new religious
communities, intense development of religious network, revival of
historically deep-rooted denominations, success
in missionary activities of Protestant churches and, to less extent, that of
the new religions, and spread of religious values throughout Ukrainian society.
Emergence of these Churches has contributed to a profound change into religious,
political, confessional and ethno-cultural situation in
Second period – 1991-1994 – is a stage of swift coupling between religion and
politics. The change in the
Involved into the orbit of religious and
political activities were not merely the big traditional Churches, but also a
multiple number of religious structures. Confessional structure of that period included
about sixty confessions. The growth rate in the number of religious communities
is among the highest in
The Split of Ukrainian orthodoxy, and
establishment in June of the year 1992 of new Orthodox Church – Ukrainian
Orthodox Church–Kyiv Patriarchate has undoubtedly proved the most important and formative event. For a short period of time Ukrainian Orthodox
Church – Kyiv Patriarchate was the only vehicle for autocephalous idea. Yet,
the internal organizational problems and build up of opposition inside this Church
resulted in establishment of the third independent Orthodox structure which has
retuned itself the name of Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church. Even though
the Ukrainian society has a controversial perception of confrontation between the
three Orthodox Structures (Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), Ukrainian Orthodox Church
– Kyiv Patriarchate, Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church,) this
confrontation has certainly weakened the Orthodox stand compared to
organizational strengthening of Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC). Over
the three years of its legally permitted
existence Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church has actually reinstated its
structures and having established more
than 2.8 parishes even exceeded its the
pre-war level .
The third period -
1995-1999 – is
marked with the apparent trend towards a decrease in severe confrontation and the
Church life was gradually coming back to normal. The stage of relative stability has succeeded
the previous decade characterized by the poly-religious explosion. The growth
rate in the number of religious communities is decreasing, and eventually reached
the average European rate; the churches are busy resolving their
organizational, staff, property, financial, economic and legal issues; and actively implement
the new Law allowed areas (from educational to entrepreneurial) into
their activities. The relationship between religions in most cases is based on secluded,
«non-constructive co- existence»: i.e. the Churches are concerned with their
internal affairs, and those joint events which they seldom organize together are
low effective and low profile. Autocephaly issue based confrontation has lost its
past acuteness; negotiations,
multilateral commissions and Church diplomacy have all been tried and did not
bring about real changes. On the other hand, under the highly politicized religious
and church environment changed several times was the government paradigm in
what regards the issue of Independent Orthodox Church.
Beginning of the fourth period falls on the first year of the new millennium and
celebration of 2000 years since the birth of Christ. This event’s immensity and impact on the
world social conscious and major Christian Confessions activities is
indisputable. In the course of
preparation for celebrations and the festivities proper the final configuration
of major players in
After optimistic hopes of the end of ÕÕ
century, it is obvious that Orthodox unification in
The same stage is also characterized with more
noticeable pressure of Islamic factor in
In the end,
noted should be the following. Constructive and conflict nature – are two
inter-related «dimensions» of poly religious society. The later has played and will
play a controversial role in