Gaukhar Dauletbayeva,
Master Science of
International Finance Management
Baitursynov
Kostanay State University (Kazakstan)
Kamshat Saginbekova, PhD in economics
KAZNEXT, Kazakstan
MAIN TYPES OF FINANCIAL SYSTEMS
Depending
on the market structure, such as “Environmental stability” and “Role of market
mechanisms in the environment”, it is possible to distinguish two main groups
of the financial system: the first one is focused on banks (“German”,
“Japanese”), and second one – on the capital market (Anglo-Saxon countries). Bank-oriented
financial system is divided in such groups as “with participation” and “without
participation of the Government”. Bank-oriented financial system with
participation of the banking system is not attractive from the economical point
of view, and, therefore, it is not reviewed in this work.
The exogenous element “Environmental
stability” may be considered as changes in the environment: collapse of the
socialistic camp and Soviet bloc, global privatization wave, technological innovations
and radical changes in the market environment [3, P. 312].
The next influencing factor – “Role of
market mechanisms in the environment” – is a partially endogenous element,
since it is related to the influence of market mechanisms inside the financial
system or through it. While influencing on market mechanisms in non-financial
environment, such as market of human resources and market of innovations and
science, it is partially exogenous. Classified important features of the main
types of financial system are given in Table 1.
Financial
systems, which are focused on the capital market or banks, cause allocation of
financial savings through markets. Bonds and shares are one of the most
important financial instruments. In this case, banks play the role of
intermediaries [14, P. 116].
Impersonal relationships between market
participants lead to free actions
when changing the structure of business financing or creditor’s portfolio.
The Government is restricted when trying
to interfere in the allocation
and its intervention is considered by the public as a violation of the rules of functioning of the free market [9, P. 471].
Table 1
Main types of
financial system
|
Bank-oriented |
Capital market |
The share of banking credit
in financing volume |
high |
small |
The share (contribution) of
the banks in GDP |
high |
small |
The share of marketable value of the national
(internal) JSC in GDP |
small |
high |
The number of companies,
which shares is quoted in the market |
small |
high |
The share of participation
in capital of households and banks |
Low permits |
high be forbidden |
Ñoncentration of
the owners and stockholders |
high |
low |
The market for futures and
options |
non-liquid |
non-liquid |
Level of the entrepreneurs'
debts |
high |
small |
Accessibility of the
information about JSC |
restricted |
plentiful |
The control of the
entrepreneurs |
Participation in
the capital by banks |
The market for
the entrepreneur's control |
Source: Allen, F.
(1995), P.181.
Bank-oriented
financial systems without intervention of Government redistribute savings
through financial institutions, primarily, through banks. The main instrument
of long-term financing is bank loans, and, therefore, banks are direct
intermediaries. In this case, the volume of the securities market is low and
not attractive. Banks and other financial institutions are the main
participants on this market [6, P. 37]. Relationships between these market participants are
personal and long-term. Due to a plenty of the rules in the commercial banking
sector, possibility of influence by the Government is high, but it is used very
carefully. If this potential of the intervention by the Government is not
exhausted, the savings are mobilized through various investment opportunities,
primarily, through the credit market. Thus, banks have no significant impact on
the development of the national economy [8, P. 7].
Bank-oriented
financial systems with the participation of the Government control the
redistribution of savings, primarily, through banks. The most important
long-term financing instruments for business activity are bank loans. In
contrast to the abovementioned financial system, in this case, the Government
takes an active part as on the capital market, so on the money market and the
credit market, and it results in formation of administrative prices. Government
bonds are traded on the securities market; financing of business activity comes
through the banks and public financial institutions. Such actions are the
characteristics of underdeveloped countries with low level of financial system
development.
The
issue of compliance of the financial systems is vigorously discussed
in today publications. American authors
prefer the financial system, which is focused on the capital market, and they
recommend to apply it for economic policy, since, in their opinion, the
bank-oriented financial system is “backward”.
They put
forward as another argument the solution of the problem in mobilizing capital
for investment, which is beyond its function and time opportunities in case of individual investors. A
shareholder is involved with its own capital as in the success of the
enterprise, and so in its failure. At the same time, it stimulates the
decentralized control of the business activity. Supporters of this system
emphasize the role of the active secondary market, since pricing on this market
is crucial in case of renewable capital market. In case of active trading of
the securities with equity participation, there is an opportunity for
acquisition of a company with a low market value and opportunity for its
effective control.
Although the
Anglo-Saxon scientists hold to the opinion that the prevalence of the bank's
influence in the financial sector is economically backward, nonetheless, they
emphasize the decisive contribution of the bank-oriented financial system in
Germany to the high economic growth of the country [4, P. 41]. Due to long-term
relationships between the Bank and Entrepreneur, information costs remain low, and,
comparing with individual investors, advantages of banks may be used [5, P. 135]. In addition, banks have
more profitable opportunities for influence and control than physical investors
on the capital market. Particular (main) difference between financing of the
business activity through banks lies in the fact that the individual contracts
are signed in this form. Rybczynski substantiates it by the fact that the
national economy in the transition of society from manufacturing to providing
of services is connected with the development of the financial system at the
same time [13, P. 9].
Conditions
set by the Government have influence on the formation of the financial system,
which is focused either on the capital market or the banks [10, P.11]. Roe sees the financial
system not only as a product of economic development, but also as a political,
historical and cultural system of the country: „corporate
structure is highly sensitive to the organization of financial intermediaries, while the
organization of intermediaries is highly sensitive to a nation’s politics“[12, P. 1997].
When choosing
between the main types of the financial system, it should take into account two
criteria: the state of development of the country and „asset
specifity“ (innovative orientation). For developing countries, the bank-oriented
financial system is recommended with close ties between banks and entrepreneurs
that promote the country as a whole [11, P. 34], [1, P. 39]. Formation of functioning and
workable capital market depends on a sufficient number of wealthy individuals
and institutional investors, as well as on high requirements for legal
guarantees of investors. It is known that these preconditions are not fulfilled
in developing countries. For this reason, the financial system, which is
focused on the capital market, is not recommended [7, P. 81]. Bank financing is beneficial in cases when it comes to investments in
standard techniques, since due to long-term connections with entrepreneurs
banks are able to analyze optimally the efficiency of debtors. While the result
of innovative processes or product development is initially unclear.
Acquisition of information and monitoring function are performed by many
potential investors independently. Consequently, the bank-oriented financial
system is popular in the countries with traditional industry. The financial
system focused on the capital market is dominating in case of the industrial
countries with application of innovative technologies [2, P. 95].
References:
1. Abramovitz, M. (2005): The Elements of Social Capability, in: Koo, B. H.
und Perkins, D. H. (Hrsg.): Social Capability and Long-Term Economic Growth,
London: Macmillian, S. 19-47
2. Allen,
F. (2003): Stock Markets and Resource Allocation, in: Mayer, C./ Vives, X.
(Hrsg.): Capital markets and Financial Intermediation, Cambrige: Cambridge
University Press, S. 81-108
3. Dosi,
G. (2000): Finance, Innovation and Industrial change, in: Jornal of Economic
Behavior and Organization, Vol. 13, S. 299-319
4. Fohlin,
C. (2008): Banking system and economic growth: lessons from Britain and Germany
in the pre-world war I era, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, S. 37-47
5. Gale, D. (2003): Informational Capacity and Financial Collapse, in:
Mayer, C. / Vives, X. (Hrsg): Capital Markets and Finacial Intermadition,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S. 117-148
6. Gischer,
H. / Herz, B. / Menkhoff, L. (2005): Geld, Kredit und Banken: Eine Einfuhrung,
2. Aufl., Berlin: Springer
7. Graff,
M. (2010): Finanzielle Entwicklung und reales Wirtschaftswachstum, Tubingen:
Mohr Siebek
8. Grossfeld, H. (1994):
Financial Systems in Transition: Is there a Case for a Bank Based System? CEPR
Discussion Paper Nr. 1062, London
9. Obst
B. / Hinter, M. (2010): Geld-, Bank- und Borsenwesen: Handbuch, Hagen, J.
von / Heinrich J. von Stein (Hrsg.),
Stuttgart: Schäffer–Poeschel Verlag
10. Prowse, S. D. (1996): Corporate finance in
international perspective: legal and regulatory influences on financial system
development, Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas) 3, S. 2-15
11. Richter, R. (2004): Institutionen okonomisch
analysiert, Tubingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck)
12. Roe, M. J. (1993): Some differences in corporate structure in Germany, Japan, and
the United States, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 102, S. 1925-2003
13. Rybczynski, T. M. (1988): Financial systems
and industrial restructuring, National Westminster Bank Review, S. 3-13
14. Schwiete, M. (2008): Finanzsysteme und
wirtschaftliche Entwicklung: theoretische Aspekte, Vergleich westlicher
Finanzsysteme und Systemtransformation in Osteuropa, Berlin, Abhandlungen zur
Nationalokonomie, Band 9