Pedagogical sciences

Associate Professor A.E.  Tkachenko

1st year undergraduate in "Economic Education"

Chuvilova O.N.

1st year undergraduate in "Economic Education"

Kalashnikova E.J.

The North Caucasian Federal University

 

RELATIONSHIP OF SUBJECTS IN THE PROCESS OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECONOMY

 

There is a reduction of innovation in modern Russia. It is due to the high commercial risk of investing in innovation related to the necessity of large financial expenses on long payback period and the imperfection of the organizational principles and practices of financial and credit support of innovative processes, tax policy and lag of standard and legal base of financial security of innovative activity. Among the reasons hampering the innovation processes in the real sector of production we can name insolvency of customers, lack of investment resources, providing creation of competitive production for world and domestic market as capital resources generated through depreciation and amortization, and borrowed formed by loans and equity( individual share ) [2].

Countries with developed market economy spend roughly the same share of GDP to finance basic and applied research, the results of which are associated with high-risk or are pioneering innovations. E.g. the U.S. spent for these purposes  from 2,2 to 2,7% over the past 15-20 years , France - from 1.8 to 2.3% ,Germany and Japan - from 2 to 2.9% ; England - from 2 to 2.5% of GDP .

In Western countries members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the R & D spending make 2.2 % of GDP, in the states of the "Big Seven" it is 2.4%, while in the United States - 2.6 %, in Russia this figure is at a level of 0.9 %. By expenditures on R & D per capita, we lag behind the world leaders in dozens of times [1].

At the same time the amount of allocated funds for science in Russia in dollar terms is many times less than in the U.S. despite the fact that prices for resources used in the innovation process have reached or even exceeded the world’s.

World experience of financial support of innovation sphere in market conditions indicates that in addition to centralized funding various extra-budgetary funds can be used for these purposes, forms of conditionally returnable credit that is repaid at achievement of commercial results, or compensated from central funds in case of a negative result.

The innovative undertaking in education, according to the director of the department organizing research complex innovation center "Skolkovo" Leonid Vodovatov lies primarily in entrepreneurial initiatives, in other words in the ability to  respond to changes in business outside the university walls [3]. Innovation means maximum mobility.

 If concerning technical disciplines our country still has some reserve, in marketing and management we hopelessly lagged behind. "Skolkovo" experts, for example, faced the problem of ignorance of foreign languages.

The integration of higher education institutions, business organizations, and state financial credit sector is necessary to realize the tasks of formation of innovative economy in the country.

In Western industrialized countries financing of innovative activity is carried out mainly from non-state sources. In terms of lack of solvent demand for advanced technologies and industrial innovations in the Russian domestic market, the state is forced to sponsor and coordinate placing of orders for the execution of R & D and innovation projects. To do this, a system of specialized funds that provide loans or non-repayable grants to enterprises for the intended use - R & D funding and innovation is organized. In the conditions of backwardness of the domestic market of innovative services and the knowledge-intensive production, specialized funds approach funding mechanisms for innovative activity to market conditions of managing and creation of such funds according to branch of industry allows to decentralize decision-making concerning the financing of innovative activity [1].

The most important characteristic of Russian economy in modern conditions is the state of science, advanced technology, technological base, defining the competitiveness of domestic products and the country as a whole, which demands attention of the state and society and assignment for the accelerated development.

The state has to take care of the problem of development of innovative strategy and ensuring financing of fundamental science and risky, breakthrough innovations, and also of creation of the innovative environment.

In our opinion, the relationship in this complex system should be as follows (Fig. 1).

Both businesses and higher education institutions should undertake a network nature of activity: a wide and varied set of contacts. But it’s possible only in case the universities gain financial autonomy. At the moment there are still no ways of practical implementation of the tasks assigned to universities in order to promote innovation in the direction of economic development. According to the president of the Association of consultants on staff, general director of holding " Empire of shots " Julia Sakharova, only 3% of young people is ready to start and operate their own business. Those who do manage to start their own business are practically imperceptible. [3].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Fig. 1. Relationship of subjects in the course of innovative development of economy

Therefore, our state should not only face the task of the creation of favorable conditions for attracting long-term resources in the economy, which is directly connected with the activity on the formation of a set of organizational and economic relations developing for research and effective use of financial resources in innovation, i.e. for financial support of innovation processes, but also to provide the economy with highly skilled personnel.

Now the state investment policy is realized generally on the basis of the development programs which priorities are:

- to increase production in sectors with rapid turnover of capital and high budgetary efficiency, providing commodity accumulation consumer market ;

- to support high-tech industries and high-tech industries with a high degree of processing, including the development of cooperation with foreign companies ;

- to produce competitive engineering products as the basis of the technical reconstruction of the economy.

In the acute shortage of internal sources of financing of innovation a particular relevance is given to formation of attractive conditions for import of high technologies to Russia. In this regard, it is necessary to fix legislatively the differentiated mode of payment of the customs duties up to their full cancellation when importing progressive types of equipment and technologies. Thus differentiation of the import duties has to be combined with use of protectionist measures of protection of the domestic knowledge-intensive industry.

Venture investors who also finance innovations including radical, use the mechanism of stock market to leave the projects. Analysis of venture investors showed that today foreign venture funds, the funds created by the largest corporations, and also investment and venture funds financed by the state are presented in the Russian financial market. The object of private overseas venture capital funds investments are not only radical innovations but also improving and organizational innovations. This contributes to high yield projects related to less risky projects. Russian science requires a long-term investment associated with a certain degree of risk.

This aspect, as a rule, isn't considered for an integration linking of science, production and innovations.

Domestic higher education institutions didn't succeed in training personnel, capable to alter the structure of the domestic economy, especially in lagged behind management sphere. Lack (scarcity) of professionals (experts) capable to reformat production from within only grows.

References:

1. Matsnev O. Venture entrepreneurship: global experience and national practice / / Problems of Economics . - ¹ 5 . - 2006, p.122 -131 .

2 . Chizhov A.P. What do venture investors in Russia lack  most of all? / / Business Journal . - ¹ 5 . - 2010, P.125 -129 .

3 . Parfenov Oleg . Somewhat and somehow ... / / Open newspaper. - ¹ 18 ( 510) , 9-16 May 2012 , p.10 .