Ê.ï.í. Ë.Ô.Àâäååâà
Taganrog Institute of management and economics
Students’ research work as a factor
of their personal and professional development
In conditions of
Russian universities integration into the European system of higher education
it became necessary to change the
forms and methods of the educational
process organization. To a large extent these changes are relevant in the course of learning
foreign languages. One of the essential requirements in the educational process
is to match the students’ achievements to
the state standard. . In
accordance with the current standards, higher schools
must provide students training at the international level so that students could
work effectively in an international
business environment. The tasks of universities
connected with the development of future
professionals as cultural and linguistic
personalities can be solved on the basis of a competence approach.
This approach
implies not only presence of certain
knowledge in some area, but also the ability to use them in specific situations. The term “competence” refers
to the complex personal formation,
providing self-development and self-learning,
which contributes to the formation of his/her
attitude to any activity.
Students’ participating in research work represents a new
stage in the search for means of
efficient education, developing students’ scientific
creativity and implementing new teaching methods. The basic ideas
in the development of these innovative
methods are: the idea of sorting
out educational content on the basis of the activity approach, individualization of
learning based on the
differentiation of students’ personality characteristics,
as well as designing the educational
process taking into account the scientific
achievements of pedagogical sciences.
We believe this
problem can be solved through students’ research
work (SRW). We regard SRW as a complex
and highly dynamic pedagogical system owing the variety of characteristics, such as: probability (thanks to its ambiguity behavior), open
(thanks to information permeability) [2]. Based on the
five-component structure of the skills offered by N.V.Kuzmina,
we consider students’ research work as a "specific theoretical and applied scientific activity,
carried out either independently or under the guidance of a teacher. The result of this activity is a
new scientific knowledge or the product,
which is new for the student and which
is directed to the development of
students’ professional and personal
qualities. Moreover, this activity implies the formation of Gnostic,
projective, constructive, communication and organizational components [3].
Activating SRW needs a certain communicative
and stimulating environment. The
main organizational components of such environments are - the organization of activities, interaction, supporting incentives, organization of training content,
organization and control of assessment criteria.
Organization of activity involves the
management of students’ creative work and joint teachers’ and students’ research work which is implemented through properly organized communication system
and to a large extent depends on each of the participants in the educational process.
Organization of interaction involves
the use of student-centered, communicative-directed
approach to learning process, which enables a comprehensive communicative and cultural competence held
in an atmosphere of cooperation and
psychologically comfortable learning
environment.
The next component to create communication-enabling environment is the
organization of incentives. A
very important component is content, this professional
component being the most substantial one.
Methodologically important conditions for the students’ efficient scientific work are:
- To provide conditions
for the student to be included
in all cooperative activities;
-To provide
students with educational and methodical complex conforming elements codifier
of the discipline maintenance;
- To create psychologically comfortable
conditions for joint activities;
- To intensify and optimize
the educational process to convert it
into a creative process based on communicative-directed, student-centered
approach to learning;
- To enrich
the learning process through various
means of communication, computer
technology;
- To construct the educational
environment so that the
environment of the student would
act as a society, stimulating diverse interaction;
- To use widely high-tech
equipment and systems of communication, reference books, etc.;
- To organize the monitoring
in order to optimally test the
degree of competence of students as
a result of the development of the
subjects under consideration.
The system of students’ research work organization
raises a lot of questions, and among them is the essential question concerning the criteria for its evaluation.
It is generally accepted to
consider both quantitative and qualitative criteria. We believe that such an approach is essential, but not sufficient. With regard to the conditions of the system for assessing the effectiveness
of SRW these criteria were divided
into five groups, taking into account such
characteristics as: recognition, informational content,
prospects, priority and fruitful influence on the person [1].
An integrated approach to teaching
and assessing the effectiveness of
SRW, which includes personality-oriented,
cross-cultural, systemic, activity
approach, creates favorable
conditions for the development of creative personality.
Thus, it is obvious that efficient students’
participation in research work is possible if educational
process is organized properly and methodically correctly.
References:
1. Avdeeva L.F. Development of students’ cognitive
creativity while mastering FL
in the active learning environment . Amursk,
AGPGU 2011.
2. Kuzmina NV Methods
of system pedagogical research. Textbook-, A; LSU,
1980.
3. Novoselova A.A. Scientific and technical creativity as a factor in students' professional training,
Ph.D. cand. ped.
Sciences, L: LSU,
1984.