Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè/5.Ñîâðåìåííûå ìåòîäû ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ
Serikova R.S., Zhussupova R.F.
Eurasian National University
named after L.N. Gumilyov, Kazakhstan
Computer-mediated
communication
The
development of the computer along with the widespread use of the Internet has
rapidly promoted Computer Mediated Communication (CMC) as a very important
communication media, which has been used widely and effectively, and has a
profound effect on many aspects of education. Alongside face-to-face (FTF)
communication, writing and printed material, CMC - as the fourth revolution in
the means of knowledge production and as a new medium with unique
characteristics - is becoming an increasingly significant element in teaching
and learning environments. CMC-based Computer Assisted Language Learning
(CMC-CALL) has considerably revolutionized the world of education by offering
countless new ways to teach and to learn [1].
Researchers are constantly exploring how CMC may contribute to the
education process in particular socio-cultural settings while also identifying
some of its limitations. It has introduced us the idea of new literacy and
language genres; and at the same time, has blurred the line between written and
oral communication. A thorough understanding of CMC-supported learning
processes is unequivocally essential for not only educators but language
teachers as well.
CMC has been extensively researched from various disciplinary and
methodological perspectives. Various definitions have been offered from a
diversity of perspectives. CMC, as first coined by Hiltz and Turoff (1978), was
originally defined as “the process by which people create, exchange, and
perceive information using networked telecommunications systems that facilitate
encoding, transmitting, and decoding messages” [1]. Similarly, CMC is openly delineated
as communication taking place between human beings via the instrumentality of computers.
Technically, CMC is widely known as a transmission and reception of messages
using computers as input, storage, output, and routing devices.
A human-oriented description of CMC can be perceived as any form of organized
computer-supported interaction between people; or as an environment in which users
interact with other users over the network [2]. When viewed as tools, CMC is
examined from technological aspects that provide the medium for communication.
Other aspects are revealed when CMC is perceived as a communication process, which
includes the message, the sender and the receiver.
Now, here we analyze the forms of implementing CMC.
Mostly, there are the possible applications of CMC which are extremely
diverse:
1. Text chats
Text chat is a synchronous form of communication involving, exactly as
the term suggests, people communicating through writing to each other, using
their computer keyboard as the mode of input. It is possible to chat with one
person online, or several. One of the commonest types of text chat is chatting
to others in a chat room- a virtual space where users can read on-screen
messages. The learners may well be already using text-based CMC and
communicating in English with friends across the world as a part of their
everyday lives. Similar activities in classes can be incorporated and learners
can communicate with other learners around the world. The first thing to do is
set up chat by using a program such as MSN Messenger. This is quite easy
because all we need to do is follow the online instructions. Visit: http:webmessenger.msn.com.
The first
step
after signing up is to add people to our address book. Learners should have
accounts. Internet users can log on to one of the many chat rooms and join in
one of the many topics being discussed with participants from all over the
world.
Here, we would like to demonstrate the usage of text chats.
Chat may well offer learners a chance to develop their language
abilities. For instance, when text chat conversation partners do not understand
what a learner has written, they will tell them, forcing the writer to rephrase
his or her message. One of the main benefits offered by chatting is the fact
that some learners who are normally shy in a face-to-face class may actually
become less shy and express themselves in a different way through a different
medium. The use of chat outside the classroom may help to make the group get
together, and could have a socially cohesive purpose.
2. Email
Email stands for electronic mail. It is possible to send an email to one
person or many. We can also send attachments in a range of file formats. It is
not always easy to convey emotions in the sending of emails. This has given
rise to the emergence of ‘smileys’ and ‘emoticons’. ‘Smiley’ is derived from
the fact that the symbol, on its side, looks like a smiling face. ‘Emoticon’ is
a word formed by ‘emotion’ and ‘icon’. In addition, the rise in the sending of
emails has been in part responsible for the rise in the number of abbreviations
used in writing, such as ‘atb’(all the best) or ‘LOL’ (laugh out loud).
Here, we can see the way of implementing emails.
Email offers many opportunities for language teachers and learners. It
can be encouraged learners to email another class. The ePALS Classroom Exchange
maintains a community of collaborative classrooms engaged in cross-culturlal
exchanges, project sharing and language learning. Email allows for an authentic
purpose for writing, such as reorganizing the time for a class. The most
obvious examples are to mail learners with a pre-lesson task, and to send and
receive homework tasks. Another opportunity is afforded by listening to
learners as they work together composing an email.
3. Audio-
conferencing
Telephone audio-conferencing has been
available for many years. A more recent development of interest to language teachers
and learners is the rise of VolP. VolP stands for voice over Internet Protocol.
Skype is one well-known example of a system enabling telephone calls to be made
over Internet. Skype is a peer-to-peer Internet telephony network. It includes
free and pay- for services.
Here, we can observe the usage of audio-conferencing.
The main attraction of audio-conferencing is that it saves people the
time and expense of travel. It can bring together participants in a remote or
isolated venue to experience a class. A freelance teacher has the opportunity
of teaching an individual learner between their face-to-face classes. This may
be a stand-alone course, or a supplement to a face-to-face course.
So, we can apply CMC in different aspects and ways closely related to
teaching. Here there are practical activities that could be used in a teaching
process.
The first practical activity is called: ‘A weekend with a friend from
out-of-town’.
The aim of the given activity is to
develop general communicative competency, especially in expressing opinions. It
is appropriate for a lower intermediate level group mates. The interaction
between peers can be held in groups of four or five. The technology used is a
chat room made available on the Internet for learners, e.g. Chatshack.
Rationale: Learners have
different levels of ability in the use of four language skills. It may well be
that those learners who are somewhat shy in speaking may express themselves
more confidently and competently through the medium of writing.
Before
class: If learners do not know how to use a chat room, a teacher should
schedule some time for them to get used to the basics of text chat. Additional
handouts with the instructions should be printed out for learners.
Procedure: Learners are
explained the task; they are going to carry out a discussion entirely using
text chat. They discuss each idea offered by a member of the group and together
decide what they should include in their final plan. After that, such learners’
expressions as I believe, I agree with, I don’t agree with,
and I think that are elicited and written on the board while they are
discussing the task.
Then, students are given handouts. When learners begin their chat, their
activities are scanned and monitored effectively. When the time is nearly up,
online discussions are rounded off.
As homework or in class, the learners can write a diary entry on the day
they spent with their friend and how they plan worked out.
The second practical exercise is called: ‘Talky-writing’. It aims
to raise awareness of the nature of writing emails. It is suitable for
intermediate and higher level learners. Interaction goes through group work and
feedback. This activity establishes some key differences between the skills of
speaking and writing. This activity is appropriate for Business English
learners.
Procedure: learners are given worksheets
and should list the key differences between speaking and writing. Then,
learners’ points are collated on the board. After that, learners are asked to
complete the box on the worksheet, and list what they see as the
characteristics of emails. Learners’ answers are elicited. In addition,
learners are asked such questions as:
- Do they spell-check emails?
- What kind of emails do learners write,
and how accurate do they have to be?
- Do they use abbreviations and
emoticons?
- Are employees legally accountable for
the content of their emails? etc. [2]
We suggest implementing these tasks in different forms (Table 1):
Table 1
|
A. wRITING |
B.
SPEAKING |
C.
EMAILS |
|
permanent |
ephemermal |
Use
emoticons |
|
concise |
Includes
repetition |
Use
abbreviations |
|
complete
sentences |
Incomplete
sentences |
Include formal and informal language |
|
formal |
informal |
Contractions allowed |
|
no
contractions |
contractions |
- |
To sum up, CMC with its particular characteristics, modes, and scopes possesses
potential benefits applicable to language development. The conclusion drawn
from the article will hopefully sketch an overall picture of naturally
integrating CMC into language education. This will then foster a confident
attitude among language institutes and teachers in bringing various CMC types
into language classroom settings. As for current position of CMC in Kazakhstan,
there are
generally higher usage
and familiarity with communications, media,
and digital technologies in the Y
Generation than the
previous generations. In
addition, the Internet penetration
rate in Kazakhstan is
34.3% while its
mobile phone penetration
rate is 100%. We hope that this article has a great
practical contribution in e-learning in Kazakhstan and abroad [3].
References:
1. Abrams,
Z. I. (2005). Asynchronous CMC, collaboration and the development of critical
thinking in a graduate seminar in applied linguistics. Canadian Journal of
Learning and Technology.
2.
Sharma P., Barrett B. (2007). Blended learning. Using technology in and beyond
the language classroom, 2007, Macmillan.
3.CIA The
World Factbook (2009). Kazakhstan. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/,
the World factbook/geos/kz.html.