Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè/5.
ñîâðåìåííûå ìåòîäû ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ
Ganyukova A., Kogay N.
Êàðàãàíäèíñêèé Ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé Óíèâåðñèòåò èì. Å.À. Áóêåòîâà
To the
question of planning lessons on Physics
at the stage
of secondary education
There are many theories in the educational process suggesting
various methods of teaching sciences in English. This article reveals 5E
Instructional Model, that is unique because it focuses on developing the learners’ knowledge
by subsequent teaching and consolidation of knowledge.
According to the BSCS 5E Instructional
Model, the key strategies to think about when planning a scientific lesson are:
engagement,
exploration, explanation, elaboration, and evaluation [1]. These 5
items, known as the "5 E's" are essential to engage children in
scientific discourse. As we experienced in class, during the lesson revealing
the theme “Magnetism”, the 5 E's help students to first become excited about
the lesson, then engage themselves in hands-on activities, create wonderings,
test the wonderings further, and discuss the lesson at the end, allowing for
sharing and assessment. The students will gain a lot of information and
conclusions during the lesson as well as new wonderings, and this allows for
the students to engage in scientific discourse from the intrinsic motivation
the lesson gives.
Engagement. The first of the 5 E's, engagement, is
the first step to introducing the lesson. Engagement involves activating
students' prior knowledge about the subject of study. In order to activate
prior knowledge, the teacher must hook the students in and make them become
interested in the lesson. There are many ways to hook the students, but one
great way is through a sort. This allows for a hands-on activity while helping
the students to start thinking about what they already know with the items they
are sorting. In class, the students were given a bag full of items and
instructed to sort the items by whether it is magnetic or not. This allowed for
each of them to use their prior knowledge and experiences with magnet in order
to help sorting. Another great way to get the students interested in the lesson
is by setting up an interesting situation in the classroom and allowing the
students to observe and discuss the situation [3]. An example of this was shown
in class when the teacher set of the magnet experiment and made the paper clip
appear to float. All of students discussed what they thought might happen if an
item passed through the magnetic field, and these predictions were based solely
on prior knowledge.
Exploration. The next of the 5 E's, exploration,
involves performing an experiment to help answer questions and provide further
wonderings. While performing the experiment, the student scientists must
collect evidence in order to back up any claims made about the experiment.
Exploration allows the students to create and test their own experiments with
given materials. This process allows for better understanding of the initial
concept, and in turn, will help to improve the students' understanding for
making claims. We experience exploration in class when each group was given a
magnet in order to test the piles created from the previous sort.
Explanation. Explanation
is one of the most critical components of the 5 E's model. This part of the
lesson facilitates students' discourse and helps the students' focus on the
goal of the lesson. From the exploration portion, students will have a few
central claims about the topic, and explanation is the opportunity for the
students to make these claims public. Once the claims are made public, other
classmates can either prove or disprove claims through their own evidence
collection. The students’ transition from small group to whole group
instruction, bringing materials and questions they have with them to the
discussion. Explanation gives the teacher an opportunity to listen to the
students' findings and guide the students towards the lesson's goal.
Elaboration. The fourth of the 5 E's is elaboration.
Elaboration occurs when the teacher implements strategies to challenge the
student's teaching. These strategies often include providing new experiences
for the learners. These experiences should stem from the learner's wonderings
and should supplement the instruction of the big idea. Elaboration builds on
the knowledge and the discourse gained and gives the learner the opportunity to
apply understanding to a new experience. Through the new experience a review of
old concepts leads the learner to a discover of new knowledge. Our science class
observed elaboration when students used their basic knowledge of magnets (from
prior knowledge and from the sorting activity) to make a prediction about what
objects will affect the magnetic field in the paper clip and magnet experiment.
Evaluation. Evaluation is the last of the 5 E's. The
teacher must create a quality assessment to gauge the learner's understanding
of the topic. The students must also be able to reflect on their own
understanding and progress. Evaluations should be made before activities to
assess prior knowledge, after activities to assess progress, and after the
completion of units to assess comprehension [7]. We discussed some ways a
teacher could evaluate the learner's during the magnet lesson. This included
the teacher or peers review the records in the science notebooks. Also, what
students know, what they learned, and what was our evidence components of the chart
would give us a general assessment of the learner's as a group.
Thus, in the classrooms of today, learners neither are no longer
passive recipients nor are the teachers the all knowing 'givers of
information, knowledge and wisdom' [9]. According to 5E’s perspective, the
teaching or rather more precisely learning of sciences is not the search for
the ultimate truth. It is the process which is of utmost importance in science
than the content. So when the learning of biology involves active construction
of knowledge by students, then the classroom environment must call for more
synergies rather than mere individual participation. The teachers need to
develop the ability to work with students creatively to generate new ideas, new
theories, new products and new knowledge. The engagement of the learner in the
construction of classroom activity requires inputs from a reflective teacher
and meticulous pre-planning before a unit is transacted in the class. Strategy
of 5E’s of learning through group work, small work and whole class work are
important, again depending on task and the teaching objective. Learner autonomy
and respect for individual learners is mandatory if real learning is to take
place. Encouraging learners to reflect and question their own understanding
further aids comprehension should help to acquire the material properly.
References:
1. Agnew P. W., Kellerman
A. S. & Meyer J. Multimedia in the Classroom, Boston: Allyn and Bacon,
2006. – P. 127-146.
2. Boud
D. & Feletti G. The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning, (2nd Ed.), London:
Kogan Page, 2009. – P. 93-102.
3. Hofstetter
F. T. Multimedia Literacy, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010. – P. 54-62.
4. Jonassen
D., Peck K., and Wilson B. (2009). Learning With Technology: A Constructivist Perspective,
New Jersey: Merrill/Prentice Hall, 2009. – P. 164-178.
5. Lindstrom R. (2011).
The Business Week Guide to Multimedia Presentations: Create Dynamic
Presentations That Inspire New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. – P. 27-39.
6. Tapscott
D. Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation, New York: McGraw-Hill,
2008. – P. 55-68.
7. Teo
R. & Wong, A. Does Problem Based Learning Create A Better Student: A Reflection?
Paper presented at the 2nd Asia Pacific Conference on Problem–Based Learning:
Education Across Disciplines, December 4-7, Singapore, 2009. – P. 45-53.
8 BPP (2000), Success in
your Research and Analysis Project.
9 http://www.cellbiol.eu/docs/Constructive_teachingKramer.pdf
10.
http://www.ncert.nic.in/html/pdf/schoolcurriculum/framework05/prelims.pdf.
11.
http://www.scienceinmotion.com/minilec/gas.html