Economical Science/5. Human Resource Management

 

Poperechnyi B.

National University of food technologies

 

FOUR KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SOCIAL NORM APPROACH

 

The personalised SNA has been developed in the context of alcohol consumption and a number of sustainability domains. Three key differences can be identified between the personalised approach and the traditional approach. First, in the personalised approach methodology, randomised control trials are often employed, allowing the comparison of different intervention groups, and control groups. 

In their practical guide to the SNA, McAlaney point out that the success of SNA campaigns depends upon ‘careful planning and an understanding of the principles involved’. This suggests that some of the failure of the campaigns identified earlier might be attributed to inadequate understanding, planning and/or implementation. Research on the SNA over the past 20 or so years suggests that effective social norm campaign have four key characteristics: they follow the basic principles of good marketing, and – more specifically to the SNA – they feature reference groups that are appropriate for the target group, they are credible and they avoid inadvertent encouragement of undesirable behaviours.

Basic marketing principles. Social norm approach campaigns are no different from other marketing and social marketing programmes in the extent to which they should follow the principles of good marketing. McAlaney stress the importance of cyclical research, planning (including segmentation and targeting), implementation and evaluation phases. Perkins and Craig emphasise the use of integrated marketing communications; for instance, their Hobart and William Smith Colleges (HWS) campaign discussed previously featured materials in print and electronic media, class projects and teacher training. Researchers also highlight the hard won nature of behaviour change and the corresponding importance of lengthy and ongoing SNA programmes; for instance, programmes of 4 years and more are considered appropriate . Finally, although eschewing scare or shock tactics, effective SNA campaigns are typically highly creative.

Appropriate reference groups. Social norm approach research consistently shows that the impact of SNA campaigns is maximised through the use in communications of the most appropriate reference group for a particular target group. In the context of the SNA, the most appropriate reference group is the group with which the target group most identifies or associates with (as opposed to aspires to or disassociates from); that is to say, people like themselves. For example, in their SNA studies of campus alcohol consumption, researchers have showed this with respect to gender; Neighbors  and race . The main approach to maximising identification and association is illustrated in the folowing:

In reality, most HWS students drink one to four drinks or do not drink at all when partying.

Hobart and William Smith Colleges Alcohol Education Project.

I DON'T SMOKE. Just like 88% of ETHS students.

Evanston Township High School .

Your energy consumption was above the average in your neighbourhood.

Home Energy Study .

In the HWS and Evanston Township High School (ETHS) examples, identification and association are maximised because the messages both refer to students at the same college as the target group. In the latter example, identification and association is maximised through the use of the term ‘your neighbourhood’. Identification and association by the target audience can also be heightened visually by the use of photographs of appropriate demographic groups (ideally real members of the target group who may even be recognised by others) and in ways that afford campaigns a powerful sense of locale. McAlaney  suggests that a sense of locale can be achieved, where it is possible and appropriate, through the use of the logos of the target institution, local institutional funders and supporters, and photographs of local landmarks.

The credibility of the data. The success of SNA programmes is also related to the credibility of the data. For example, in the context of a failed alcohol-related SNA intervention at a college in the USA, Granfield suggests that this may have been because of the fact that more than 45% of the participants did not believe the social norm data. Three key approaches to this potential problem can be readily suggested. First, through engagement with the target audience in the planning stage, the credibility of messages in different formats can be informed, tested and enhanced. Second, and this technique also deepens identification and association, is through comprehensive attribution of the data that is cited in the communications. For instance, the HWS and ETHS messages cited earlier are complemented by the following respective attributions:

Data drawn from the Spring 2008 core Alcohol and Drugs Survey conducted on a random sample of HWS students with 481 respondents.

2002 Social Marketing Survey. N = 2341 ETHS students. Funded by the Chicago Community Trust, Rotary Club of Evanston Lighthouse and Tobacco Settlement Funds.

Finally, it is suggested that highly visible, poster-based ‘headline’ messages and attributions, such as those cited earlier, should be backed-up with more detailed and comprehensive information in other formats. Such information might be provided, it is suggested, in the form of websites and in face-to-face workshops (for instance, see the SGNM approach discussed earlier).

Avoiding inadvertent increases in socially undesirable behaviours. The final characteristic of effective SNA campaigns is that they avoid inadvertent increases in a socially undesirable behaviour, a phenomena that has become known as the ‘boomerang effect’. In their SNA study on energy consumption, Schultz and his colleagues provided social norm feedback in the form of the average consumption. The study noted that the energy consumption of those households that used less than the communicated average at the outset of the study actually increased their energy consumption during the intervention. Thus, the ‘boomerang effect’ refers to inadvertent movement towards the norm of people in the target audience whose behaviour is the ‘right’ side of the norm at the outset of the intervention.

Clearly, this insight casts a shadow over the popular social marketing technique of issuing a warning by emphasising the extent of the socially undesirable behaviour. For instance, Cialdini  cite a US Federal Drug Administration Commission announcement that, ‘more than 3 million youths in the USA smoke and that 3000 become regular smokers each day’. Similarly, based upon a number of studies, since 2000, the US online media and blogosphere remains replete with the message that ‘65% of adults are overweight’ . The boomerang effect suggests that the social norms messages embedded in these putative warnings may increase both the social acceptability and the prevalence of the undesirable behaviour – in these examples, smoking and being overweight – and should therefore be avoided.

Within the context of the personalised feedback approach, researchers and programme managers have employed two methods to obviate the ‘boomerang effect’. First, following the success of Schultz , the introduction of rewarding or injunctive messages for those whose behaviour is already the ‘right’ side of the average. Typically, these take the form of encouraging and rewarding messages, accompanied by increasing numbers of smiley faces reflecting increasingly ‘good’ performance or behaviour. However, frowny face emoticons have been shown to upset people and should not be used. Second, this approach is combined with the inclusion of a more ambitious norm in the form of the average performance of the ‘best’ 20% of the participants .

 

References

1.  Allcott H. 2010. Social norms and energy conservation. O-POWER. Available at http://tinyurl.com/2v72pfp  [accessed on 13 June 2013].

2.   McAlaney J, McMahon J. 2007. Normative beliefs, misperceptions and heavy episodic drinking in a British student sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 68(3): 385392.

3.   McAlaney J, Bewick B, Bauerle J. 2010. Social norms guidebook: a guide to implementing the social norms approach in the UK. Available at http://www.normativebeliefs.org.uk/Guidebook.pdf [accessed on 1 July 2013].

4.   National Social Norms Institute. 2012a. Evanston Township High School Strength in Numbers Campaign. Available athttp://www.socialnorm.org/CaseStudies/evanstonhs.php [accessed on 1 July 2013].