Dluhopolskyi Oleksandr
Ph.D. in Economics, Professor of Economics Department
dlugopolsky@mail.ru
Zukovska Alina
Ph.D., Associate Professor of State and
Municipal Management Department
Ternopil
National Economic University, Ukraine
Public-private partnership versus free pro-corruption markets: Ukrainian
experience
In the article the features of
using in Ukraine public-private partnerships as a mechanism for preventing and combating
corruption, which is done by: providing a transparent mechanism competitions,
creating conditions for the development of self-regulatory organizations and the gradual transfer of their functions
of government regulation and control,
providing information and logistical
support to foreign investors, creation in all regions of Ukraine, equal conditions for competition of cities (regions) in the market of
investment, particularly foreign direct investment
strategy, yielding a high added value, creating
special investment regimes
in certain areas.
In the article the analyzes the current state of
the use of public-private partnership in Ukraine revealed issues of
institutional and legislative support to its development, including: the
presence of high levels of corruption in the government, leading to the rise of
public-private partnerships for the private partner; insecurity receiving
private partner from executive or local government permits and approvals
necessary for performance of the contract, including a right to use the land
necessary for the performance of the contract, lack of confidence in the
possibility of a private partner with the state equal protection of their
interests in the system justice, in particular, the possibility to require the
state obligations and compensation for the losses due to defaults, the lack of
guarantees of financial obligations of public-private partnership for the
entire period of implementation of the state, which is associated with annual
approval of the budget and budget adjustment programs, the lack of tax and
customs exemptions for projects of public-private partnership that reduces
their attractiveness to private partners for the availability of such benefits
for other forms of stimulation of investment activity, the possibility of
changes in the regulatory framework, including changes to the tax and
regulatory legislation, changes in quality standards (increased requirements)
for goods and services provided by the private sector partner for the contract,
which may result in a significant change in terms of participation of private
partners in projects.
In the article the proposed approaches
to public policy, the implementation of which will
accelerate the practical implementation of the main forms of public-private
partnerships to reduce corruption,
including: improvement of the legal framework
governing relations of public-private
partnerships, improve institutional support for the development of public-private partnerships,
increase guarantees protection of
public and private partners in the
development, approval and
implementation.