Kim Daria
Hanyang University, Republic of Korea
Korean
Hallyu: “soft” power or economic promotion?
For the present time, many scholars argue, what a state should apply in
its foreign policy to gain benefits in international arena – “hard” or “soft
power”. It is difficult to establish, which one is better and which one is more
efficient? First, “hard power” is recognized with – country’s military complex
and economic influence, the methods are – treats, intimidation, payment
rewards, behavior- threaten and induce” [2.3]. Soft power is classified by
cultural, educational and social influence, which force others do what you
want. The behavior is to attract and to coopt; “the methods are inherent
qualities and communication” [2.3]. The answer is no one can be fully efficient
to one’s state policy.
After Seoul Olympic Games 1988 world
discovered Korea, it was not that South Korea had not diplomatic relations with
other foreign countries, however it established diplomatic relations also with
communist countries and achieved its own place in the international arena.
Throughout its all history Korea was
influenced by other countries, and had no experience of pressuring with force
to others. First China was Korean world, and then different barbarian tribes,
like Khitan and Mongolians, tried to contend with China for influence on Korean
Peninsula. Then it was Russo-Japanese War 1904-1905, where Japan won and nailed
down Korea as its sphere of influence. After WWII South Korea has become
independent, and formed military alliance with USA. In 1945 the US consider
Korea as barrier to Japan from communism expansionism. It invested money for Korean economy,
because it needed a strong ally in Asia-Pacific Region, not just a buffer.
The US with its military troops in
South Korean territory and not far away military base in the island Guam, keep
security in South Korea from its neighbor. South Korea decided to take a
bandwagoning type of international role. Bandwagoning
refers to alignment with the source of danger when a state confronts a
significant external threat. “Bandwagoning means capitulation and accommodation
to pressure and acceptance of even illegitimate actions by the dominant great
power” [5.21]. Sitting in “American wagon” Korea went throughout all the events
of second half of 20th century. However the new time possess new
challenges for America, and therefore to Korea.
This security problem causes
different obligation for South Korea. Hence, Korea still “listen to the USA’s
advice” in political sphere. It doesn’t blindly follow all the directions of
America, it has some independent points. How much the US tried to normalize
relations between South Korea and Japan, the two members out of three in
North-East Asian alliance, still the two countries relations seemed to be
rather cold, out of economic ties, its barely can be seen political approach
between them.
Being advanced country with
export-oriented model of economy, South Korea cooperates with a lot of
countries and its economic ties are very strong. However, in political sphere
the Korean course is rather limited due to the US. Therefore here comes public
diplomacy, which is becoming a very important political tool. The notion of
public diplomacy includes international relations and contacts through the
implementation of scientific, cultural and educational programs (exchanges of
delegations, traditional exhibitions, youth festivals, joint holidays etc.) -
All variety of ways to interact with civil society and foreign audiences.
In this perspective we can analyze Hallyu
or Korean way. Some scholars consider it as simple economic promotion of Korean
goods and some consider it as “soft power”. To analyze what it is it is better
to compare with the phenomenon of “American dream”. It is a complex concept, which includes different spheres. One
of this is only media industry, which brought “$546 billion in 2014 to America” [1]. Everyone in the world watch
American movies, listen to its singers, use Internet, but this is the economic
part of American dream. The other contents you can’t count, you can only
consider it. “The United States has long been epitomized as a land of
equal opportunity, where hard work and skill can result in personal success and
fulfillment, regardless of one's station in life” [6.1]., America has always
been seen as a hope for a good life, freedom and opportunity. Therefore from
the beginning of its foundation, people all over the world start to immigrate
to America and this process haven’t stopped yet. This “American dream” can
control masses outside of the US, which is like an invisible hand and is
important addition to its “hard power”.
In comparison Hallyu consists of media industry, which also promotes
food and cosmetics industry. Starting from PSY’s song “Oppa, Gangnam style”,
which got into minds of people all over the world, Korean media industry
entered not only Asian market, as it was before, but also European, North and
South American ones. The Korean
government support the development of Hallyu, for example it provided loans and
credits to entertainment and food companies. The Korean embassies in foreign
countries also held different events, promoting Hallyu. For example,
Vladivostok General Consulate of Republic of Korea supports Korean movie shows,
playing traditional music instruments, making traditional craft in Korean
language center among Russian citizens.
“According to the international income and expenditure statistics by the
Export-Import Bank of Korea, the revenue of Hallyu related contents from
overseas broke the record of 150 billion won in the first half of 2012, and
foreign currency income related to K-Pop and media contents reached 150 billion
won in the first half” [7.130].
People started to know Korea from
different points of views: hi-tech (electronic goods of Samsung and LG), light
industry (cosmetics products have increased its popularity worldwide due to its
quality and cheap price), culture (traditional and modern). Therefore this act
raises Korean image and popularity among foreign people and therefore states.
Hallyu can bring new economics
profits for South Korea. The 21st century has brought a shift from
political-military attention to economic-political. The economics has become
the first concern for many states, and the politics decisions are dictated by
economic benefits. Therefore economics can bring a new political cooperation
for Seoul. However, Hallyu with all economic benefits doesn’t have the main
content of moral attitude like “American dream”. Hallyu should make people to
come to Korea in order not to see the concert of its beloved K-pop group, but
to live, work and share the Korean traditions and mentality. Due to the
closeness of Korean society out of foreigners it is hardly to persuade in
nearest future. Hallyu is great basis for creating Korean dream, which will be
Korean soft power. In conclusion, the meaning of resource “soft power” has
increased its value in Korea, as it is not able to get significant influence
over the traditional tools of power in the region; however, Korea claims the
status of a regional center in a multipolar world order. Therefore Korea should
develop Hallyu in social way, to create a “soft power”, which will be useful to
Korean reality now.
References:
1.
http://selectusa.commerce.gov
/ industry - snapshots / media - entertainment - industry - united -
states.html.
2.
Joseph S. Nye, Jr.
Soft Power, Hard Power and Leadership // Harvard Business Review magazine. October
27, 2006. 23 P.
3.
Joseph S. Nye, Jr.,
Richard L. Armitage. The U.S.-Japan Alliance: Anchoring Stability in Asia // A
report of the CSIS Japan Chair. August, 2012. 20 P.
4.
Joseph S. Nye, Jr.
Soft Power // Foreign Policy Journal. No. 80. Autumn, 1990. pp. 153-171.
5.
Sung-Hack Kang. Korea's Foreign Policy Dilemmas: Defining State Security and the Goal
of National Unification // Global Oriental.
December13, 2010. 425 P.
6.
Mark Robert Rank. Chasing the American Dream // Oxford University Press; 1 edition . April 1, 2014.
7.
Jin-Young Kim and Jong Oh Lee. Korean
Pop Culture: Ups and Downs // International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous
Engineering Vol.9, No.3. 2014. pp.129-134.