Ôèëîëîãè÷åñêèå
íàóêè/4.
Ñèíòàêñèñ: ñòðóêòóðà,ñåìàíòèêà,ôóíêöèÿ
Êðûæàê Î.Þ.
Íàöèîíàëüíûé òåõíè÷åñêèé
óí³âåðñèòåò Óêðàèíû «Êèåâñêèé ïîëèòåõíè÷åñêèé èíñòèòóò»
THE GENERAL CHARACTERISTIC OF NEOLOGISMS
According to professor
I.V.Arnold [1], a neologism is a
newly coined word or phrase or a new meaning for an existing word, or a word
borrowed from another language.
The appearance of a great number of new
words and the development of new meanings in the words already available in the
language may be largely accounted for by the rapid flow of events, the progress
of science and technology and emergence of new concepts in different fields of
human activity. The influx of new words has never been more rapid than in the
last few decades of this century. Estimates suggest that during the past
twenty-five years advances in technology and communications media have produced
a greater change in our language than in any similar period in history. The
specialised vocabularies of aviation, radio, television, medical and atomic
research, new vocabulary items created by recent development in social history — all are part
of this unusual influx. Thus war has brought into English such vocabulary items
as blackout, fifth-columnist, paratroops,
A-bomb, V-Day, etc.; the
development of science gave such words as hydroponics,
psycholinguistics, polystyrene, radar, cyclotron, meson, positron; antibiotic, etc.; the conquest and research of
cosmic space by the Soviet people gave birth to sputnik, lunnik, babymoon,
space-rocket, space-ship, space-suit, moonship, moon crawler, Lunokhod, etc [2, p. 182].
The adaptive lexical system
is not only adding new units but readjusts the ways and means of word-formation
and the word-building means [2].
As
professor Ginzburg [2, p. 184] has observed, there are two ways of enriching
the vocabulary:
1. Vocabulary extension — the appearance of new lexical items. New vocabulary
units appear mainly as a result of productive or patterned ways
of word-formation and non-patterned ways of word-creation;
2.
Semantic extension — the appearance of new meanings of existing words which
may result in homonyms.
Productive word-formation is the most
effective means of enriching the vocabulary. The most widely used means are affixation,
conversion and word-composition.
Affixation is generally
defined as the formation of words by adding derivational affixes to different
types of bases.
Derived words usually consist of a root and an affix, which in their
turn fall into prefixes which proceed the root in the structure of the word (re-write, mis-pronounce) and suffixes
which follow the root (teach-er,
dict-ate). Words like reappearance, unreasonable, denationalise, are often qualified as
prefixal-suffixal derivatives [2].
Conversion, one of
the principal ways of forming words in Modern English, is highly productive in
replenishing the English word-stock with new words. It is sometimes referred to as an
affixless way of word-building or even affixless derivation.
Word-composition
(compounding) is one of the
productive types of word-formation in Modern English. This is a type of word
building, in which new words are produced by combining two or more stems.
Compounds, though certainly fewer in quantity than derived or root words, still
represent one of the most typical and specific features of English
word-structure.
In neutral
compounds the process of compounding is realized without any linking elements,
by a mere juxtaposition of two stems (shop-window,
bedroom, tallboy).
Morphological
compounds are fewer in number . This type is not productive and it is
represented by words in which two compounding stems are combined by a linking
vowel or consonant (Anglo-Saxon,
statesman, handiwork).
In syntactic
compounds we find a feature of a specifically English word-structure. These
words are formed from segments of speech, preserving in their structure
numerous traces of syntagmatic relations typical of speech: articles,
prepositions, adverbs, prepositions (lily-of-the-alley,
good-for-nothing).
Telescopy is the result of conscious creation of words by
merging irregular fragments of several words which are aptly called “splinters.”
Splinters assume different shapes — they may be severed from the source word at a morpheme
boundary as in transceiver (transmitter + receiver); transistor (transfer + resistor) or at a syllable boundary like cute (from execute) in electrocute; medicare
(from medical care); polutician (pollute + politician) or boundaries of both kinds may be
disregarded as in brunch (breakfast
+ lunch), smog (smoke + fog), ballute (baloon + parachute), etc [2].
Clipping refers to the
creation of new words by shortening a word of two or more syllables (usually
nouns and adjectives) without changing their class membership. For example: Ad (from advertisement),
lab (from laboratory), mike (from microphone), car (from motor-car), phone (from telephone), copter (from
helicopter), maths (from mathematics), pants (from
pantaloons), specs (from spectacles), flu
(from influenza), tec (from detective), fridge (from
refrigerator), etc.
Letter abbreviations are mere replacements of longer phrases
including names of well-known organisations, names of agencies and
institutions, political parties, famous people, names of official offices, etc.
They are not spoken or treated as words but pronounced letter by letter and as
a rule possess no other linguistic forms proper to words. The following may
serve as examples of such abbreviations:
CBW = Chemical
and Biological Warfare, DOD = Department of Defence, ITV
= Independent
Television, SST = supersonic transport, etc
[2, p. 189]
Acronyms are regular
vocabulary units spoken as words. They are formed in various ways:
1) From
the initial letters or syllables of a phrase:
UNO = United Nations
Organisations; NATO = North Atlantic Treaty Organisation;
2) Acronyms may be formed from the initial
syllables of each word of the
phrase:
Interpol
= inter/national pol/ice; Tacsatcom = Tactical Satellite Communications: Capcom = Capsule Communicator;
3) Acronyms may be formed by a combination
of the abbreviation of the first or the first two members of the phrase with
the last member undergoing no change at all:
V-day = Victory Day; H-bomb = hydrogen bomb; g-force = gravity force, etc.
Semantic neologisms are
new lexical-semantic variants of words formed on the basis of already existing lexical items
[3].
Semantic
extension of words already available in the language is a powerful source of
qualitative growth and development of the vocabulary though it does not
necessarily add to its numerical growth; it is only the split of polysemy that
results in the appearance of new vocabulary units thus increasing the number of
words [2].
A great
number of new meanings develop in simple words which belong to different
spheres of human activity. New meanings appear mostly in everyday general
vocabulary, for example beehive — ‘a
woman’s hair style’; lungs (n
pl.) — ‘breathing spaces, such as small parks that might be
placed in overpopulated or traffic-congested areas’; bird — ‘any flying craft’; vegetable — ‘a lifeless, inert
person’; clean (sl.) — free
from the use of narcotic drugs’; to uncap (sl.) — ‘to
disclose, to reveal’.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Àðíîëüä È.Â. Ëåêñèêîëîãèÿ ñîâðåìåííîãî
àíãëèéñêîãî ÿçûêà.- Ì.: Âûñøàÿ øêîëà, 1986.- 295 ñ. – Íà àíãë. ÿç.
2.
Ginzburg R.S. A course in modern English lexicology.- Moscow: Vysshaja Shkola,
1979.- 269 p.
3. Æëóêòåíêî Þ.À. Àíãëèéñêèå íåîëîãèçìû.- Êèåâ:
Íàóêîâà äóìêà, 1983.- 167 ñ.