KEY ISSUES
OF THE LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT REFORM IN UKRAINE
Mr Denys ZAPYSNYY,
Ph.D. Researcher, Classical Private University (Zaporizhia,
Ukraine)
Today, Ukraine is facing an urgent need to
implement large-scale decentralisation reform. Decentralisation in Ukraine can
be viewed as a part of a wider public administration reform, which requires
re-distribution of tasks, competences, and resources at central, regional, and
local levels [7].
Better policy planning and co-ordination,
sound administrative procedures and improved public financial management are of
fundamental importance for the functioning of the local self-government system
and for implementing the decentralisation reform required for integration with
the EU [4]. Ukraine has to increase its efforts to improve its municipal
administration on the basis of the relevant national strategy. A strong
political commitment is also needed to steer the decentralisation reform
process.
The Article 2 of the European Charter of Local
Self-Government stipulates that the principle of local self-government shall be
recognised in the domestic legislation, and where practicable in the
constitution. In this regard, the ECLSG creates itself an excellent benchmark
for measuring the level and the scope of the decentralisation in the countries
that have already signed and ratified this main European legal instrument in
the field of LSG [3].
In this context, it has to be noted that Ukraine
signed the European Charter of Local Self-Government on 6
November 1996 and ratified it in 1997, without any reservations, with
entry into force on 1st January 1998. Ukraine signed in 2011 and ratified
in 2014 the Additional Protocol to the European Charter of Local
Self-Government on the right to participate in the affairs of a local authority [1].
The Constitution of Ukraine (1996) and the
1997 Law on Local Self-Government are based on a distinction between “local
communities” (hromada – citizens of village, town, city) and “administrative
and territorial units”.
After several years of “stagnation” the
current Ukrainian Government re-started the process of improving the local
democracy and the functioning of self-governments. On 1 April 2014 the
Government of Ukraine approved (by its Regulation ¹ 333-p) the new concept of
the reform of LSG and territorial organisation of the authorities in Ukraine.
Significant efforts are connected with changes to the Constitution in regard of
decentralisation. The proposed changes passed the first reading in the
Parliament in August 2015.
At the same time, the Parliament of Ukraine
adopted in June 2014 the Law on Inter-municipal Cooperation and in February
2015 – the Law on Voluntary Merger of the Territorial Communities (hromadas).
The process of voluntary merges was promoted by very strong financial incentives
(close to cancelling of all transfers to very small municipalities, if they do
not decide to merge). In such environment the voluntary amalgamation process
started quite actively. As a result 159
merged municipalities representing 794 cities, settlement and village councils
participated in municipal elections in October 2015.
Changes implemented since the end of 2014
also mean that most of competences that were transferred to central government
in the past, now returned or are in the process of returning to the LSG level.
There is an intention to transfer some other functions of the central
government to municipalities, for example in the area of construction permits
[5].
In the end of 2015 the Parliament of Ukraine
adopted the new Law on Civil Service which was entered into force on 1st
May 2016. This law will influence the functioning of the central government
level, but is expected to have positive impact also on local level. This law is
also expected to help depoliticise the civil service - there will be a
difference between political and administrative positions.
At the same time, it will be
recommended to Ukrainian
authorities to reinforce their efforts on further LSG development as an
integrated part of wider public administration reform in order to pay a
particular attention to the following objectives:
·
A completion of
the constitutional reform in its part relating to the decentralisation of power
should be treated as a priority objective: 2.
Territorial
boundaries of local self-governance bodies and executive power
should be defined in order to reinforce the three-tier system of administrative
and territorial structure (with 27 regions, 120-150 rayons, 1500-1800 local communities);
·
A clear
division of competences should be set between the local self-governance bodies
of different levels (hromada, rayon and oblast). At the same time,
the competences which are the most vital for peoples’ life should be
transferred to the levels closest to the people following the principle of subsidiarity;
·
A clear division of competences should be set between
the LSG bodies and local state administration bodies. The latter
should transfer most of their competences to local self-governance bodies and
retain only control functions;
·
The fiscal
decentralisation reform should be
continued with a particular focus on the implementing each of the
recommendations formulated by the EaP CSF Sub-group for Local Government and
PAR in 2012;
·
The
accountability of LSG bodies to the citizens of the respective hromadas should
be reinforced. People will become aware that the quality of the local power
operation will depend on their voting. So the quality of life will depend on
the residents themselves;
·
Standards for
services delivery and its financing should be developed with particular focus
on education, health, and other social services. Full implementation of these
standards into the state transfers/subsidies mechanisms will ensure consistent
access to public services throughout the whole territory of Ukraine. This step
will stimulate optimisation of social infrastructure, spending resources for
increasing quality of services instead of maintenance of public utilities;
·
A more
transparent framework for local budgets should be established. Increasing of
local funds should be accompanied by enhancing mechanism of public control and
supervision over utilisation of these funds. Local authorities have to be
accountable to local communities especially in terms of planning,
implementation and reporting on spending of local finances;
·
Awareness of the
citizens of the decentralisation
reform, its objectives and the main results should be enhanced and
promoted;
·
Further
development of IMC as an important stage for further amalgamation of the
communities (hromadas) should be continued. At the same time, the process of
amalgamation of the communities should be further supported by the central
government. In this regard, the dialogue with the newly elected mayors and
local elected representatives should be reinforced; awareness raising campaigns
among mayors based on success-stories and peer-to-peer approach may be also
used;
·
The autonomy of
LSG bodies to manage their own human resources within the framework provided by
the relevant laws should be further guaranteed. At the same time, proper
control mechanisms of compliance with the provisions of law should be
established. The new Law on Service in
LSG Bodies should be finalised and adopted. Its quick implementation should be
a priority for further realisation of the decentralisation reform in Ukraine;
·
The delegated
powers and competences should be fully financed by the central government,
introduction of new privileges and bonuses should be accompanied by respective
financial resources to the local budgets.
References and
bibliography:
1.
Civil Service in
Figures – 2015. National Agency on Civil Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, 2015,
available at: www.nads.gov.ua
2.
Council of Europe. Additional Protocol to the European
Charter of Local Self-Government on the Right to Participate in the Affairs of
a Local Authority, 2009, available at:
https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168008482a
3. European Charter of
Local Self-Government: Standing Conference of Local and Regional Authorities,
Strasbourg, 1985
4.
Encyclopedia of Public Administration in 8 tomes. Group of authors headed by Y. Kovbasiuk. Kyiv, National Academy of Public
Administration under the President of Ukraine. Tom 6 «Civil Service». 2011, 524 p.
5.
Kuybida V., Tkachuk A., Tolkovanov V. “Experience on the implementation
of good governance standards on local level in Ukraine and other European
countries”, Kyiv, “Kramar”, 2010, 317 p.
6.
Tolkovanov Vyacheslav “La mise en oeuvre du nouveau systeme de l’autonomie
locale en Ukraine”. These de doctorat (droit public), Universite Robert Schuman
de Strasbourg III, 2006, 405 p.
7.
Tolkovanov
Vyacheslav, Tools for Ensuring Good Governance at Local and Regional Levels.
PhD Thesis in Public Administration. - Zaporizhia, 2013, 436 p.