Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå
íàóêè./2.Ïðîáëåìû ïîäãîòîâêè ñïåöèàëèñòîâ.
Olga Krayevska
Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Ukraine
Subject Integration in Communicative
Competence Formation of Future Managers-Agrarians
Efficient formation of communicative competence of managers-agrarians
has gained immense importance for their future development and career. In the
modern world of constant, intense and essential communication,
managers’ communicative competence significantly influences the effectiveness
of the business activity of the company they work for. According to Patrick Forsyth,
the key tasks of a manager are planning, recruitment and selection, organizing,
training and development, motivation and control [1]. No wonder, up to 90 % of
a manager’s work time is spent for communication.
Successful communicative competence formation of future
managers-agrarians is an especially important task of higher education for
countries with rich agrarian potential and human resources. Communicative
activity of managers of this type is becoming more various, intense and
important, hence it needs substantial preliminary study and preparation. The
very nature of communicative competence implies integration of knowledge and
skills from different fields: linguistics, psychology, culturology etc. In modern
conditions, when higher education is aimed at supplying professional training
in different subjects, communicative competence formation process demands
substantial subject integration.
Communicative competence definition and structure have been disputable
problems for quite a long time. Communicative competence is generally defined
as “a term in linguistics which refers to a language user's grammatical
knowledge of syntax, morphology, phonology and the like, as well as social
knowledge about how and when to use utterances appropriately” [2].
Dell Hymes, the scholar who coined the term “communicative competence”,
defined it as “communicative form and function in integral relation to each
other”. Vesna Bagaric and Jelena Mihaljevic Djigunovic in their article
“Defining communicative competence” [3] clearly signify difficulties and
controversies in communicative competence definition process since late 1960.
Nowadays, the interest to communicative competence formation process has even
intensified under the influence of global communication and the disputes became
more practical rather than theoretic.
All the attempts of scientists
to structure and generalize the notion “communicative competence” collide with
objective differences in communicative competence structure of workers of
different fields, difference in correlation between the elements of
communicative competence structure, as well constant change of the elements in
the process of intense development of global communication. In these
conditions, it is hardly possible to find one universal magic recipe of
effective communication and communicative competence formation. Yet it is vital
for business efficiency to study and define communicative competence of
different specialists, like managers-agrarians, and to clarify favorable
conditions of their communicative competence formation in the process of
professional training.
We believe that subject integration in communicative competence formation
of future managers-agrarians is the key to solving the problem of successful
formation of the competence. By integrating such subjects like foreign
language, native language, psychology, culturology and even some topics of
professional economic courses we supply natural unification of knowledge and
skills which will be connected in future professional activity. Moreover,
integration significantly improves educational process as it enables
coordination of educational material and economy of time, on
the one hand, as well as extension and deepening of some courses by means of
saved time and effort, on the other hand.
However, before integrating some courses the notion and types of subject
integration should be thoroughly studied.
Integration in education is approached today,
according to Kozlovska I., as “the process of convergence and
connection of sciences, which operates along with the process of
differentiation, which is the highest form of embodiment of relations between
subjects to a new level of learning” [4]. According to Kozlovska I., there are three levels of
integration in education: interdisciplinary connections, synthesis
of interrelated and interacting sciences in the basic discipline and an
integrative holistic system (as an integrative course).
Appliance of integrative approach proves to be
especially effective on the second level of integration as synthesis of interrelated and interacting
sciences in the basic discipline. For that purpose, it is appropriate, for example, to combine the process of learning a
foreign language and those aspects of psychology that are directly necessary
for communication and communicative competence formation. Using such techniques
of psychological communication training as
“citation of a partner”, “positive statements technique”, “informing technique”
and “an interesting story technique” at foreign
language classes, for example, enables future managers to learn
and immediately apply psychological and linguistic aspects of communication naturally,
as they are bound and indissoluble
in their professional activity.
The search for subject integration
possibilities and their usage turn out to be productive and lead to real
improvement of managers-agrarians’ communicative competence formation process.
References
1. Patrick Forsyth. How to Motivate People. London: Kogan Page, 2006.
2. Communicative competence. Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicative_competence
3. Defining communicative competence. Retrieved from hrcak.srce.hr/file/42651
4. Êîçëîâñüêà ². Ì. Òåîðåòèêî-ìåòîäîëîã³÷í³ àñïåêòè ³íòåãðàö³¿ çíàíü ó÷í³â ïðîôåñ³éíî¿ øêîëè (äèäàêòè÷í³ îñíîâè). – Ëüâ³â: Ñâ³ò, 1999. – 302 ñ.